All Forums | Tennis

My tennis strategy THE ZONE.

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 48812
Posts: 648
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by DogHouse:

Peng handled her business
Yes she's looking like a contender for the final.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #27
BANKROLL 957.60 units

U.S OPEN

Pick number 012-Hingis/Pennetta V Peschke/Srebotnik

Hingis/Pennetta to win @1.57--Stake 20 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 6--5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #28
BANKROLL 969 units

SHANGHAI CHALLENGER

Pick number 013-Y.Nishioka VS W.Chuhan

Y.Nishioka to win @1.40--Stake 20 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 7--5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #29
BANKROLL 977 units

SHANGHAI CHALLENGER

Pick number 014-L.Vanni VS R.J.Statham

L.Vanni to win @1.53--Stake 20 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 8--5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #30
BANKROLL 987.60

U.S OPEN

Pick number 015--V.Azarenka VS E. Makarova

V.Azarenka to win @1.80--Stake 20 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 9--5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #31
BANKROLL 967.60 units

GENOVA CHALLENGER

Pick number 016--V. Troicki VS D.Brown

V.Troicki to win @1.40--Stake 60 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 9--6
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #32
BANKROLL 991.60 units

SHANGHAI CHALLENGER

Pick number 017--L.Vanni VS S.Singh

L.Vanni to win @1.62--Stake 20 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 10--6
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 2304
Posted: #33
What book lets you bet that amount on Challenger matches?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by Doja45:

What book lets you bet that amount on Challenger matches?
Hello Doja45, not book. BOOKS. If I want to bet say 120 units. I will spread it across four or five accounts. Or different HIGHSTREET bookmakers (here in the UK)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #35
BANKROLL 1004 units

BRASOV CHALLENGER

Pick number 018-G.Melzer VS G.Rufin

G.Rufin to win @1.44--Stake 10 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 11--6
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #36
BANKROLL 1008.40 units

MEDELLIN CHALLENGER

Pick number 019-M.Trungllili VS F.Bagnis

F.Bagnis to win @1.53

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 12--6
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:

BANKROLL 1008.40 units

MEDELLIN CHALLENGER

Pick number 019-M.Trungllili VS F.Bagnis

F.Bagnis to win @1.53--Stake 10 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 12--6
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #38
BANKROLL 1013.70

U.S OPEN

Pick number 020-Hingis/Pennetta V Black/Mirza

Hingis/Pennetta to win @1.73--Stake 5 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 13--6
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #39
BANKROLL 1017.35 units

SHANGHAI CHALLENGER

Pick number 021-Y.Nishioka VS D.Udomchoke

Y.Nishioka to win @1.62--Stake 5 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 14--6
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 8403
Posted: #40
I do not understand your system at all, why don't you just keep consistent units for plays?

ranging from 5 units to 100 seems unnecessary and pointless. You're going from less then 1% on some plays to 10% on others.

GL with it I guess

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by n3gative:

I do not understand your system at all, why don't you just keep consistent units for plays?

ranging from 5 units to 100 seems unnecessary and pointless. You're going from less then 1% on some plays to 10% on others.

GL with it I guess

luck is not in this equation. Sports bettors overall make hard work of the easiest way to win. The point of the jumps in units was to pull back a poor start. Since I began on the forum. From a bad U.S open start.

Now that I'm in the black my stakes will be TWO LEVELS. So long as I don't lose three in a row. The strength of staying off the big names most of the time in tennis is less will go wrong.

Numbers rule ALL gambling. The first thing any gambler with any aspirations of being a LONGTERM success must do is understand everything get its turn. Outsiders are going to win their share in the big tournaments. Most bettors get too emotional, to involved with the players. That's the biggest mistake you can make.

Be concerned about the numbers. And there's no mystery to being a success.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #42
You are betting a system that 99% of bettors on this site cannot do. Most do not have multiple accounts or have numerous public bookies to get the appropriate action on ITF/Challenger events to make it worth while. This is the equivalent of someone who posts a line 2 points below the public line and claims it's from a local.




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:

You are betting a system that 99% of bettors on this site cannot do. Most do not have multiple accounts or have numerous public bookies to get the appropriate action on ITF/Challenger events to make it worth while. This is the equivalent of someone who posts a line 2 points below the public line and claims it's from a local.




Why can't they do it? It just takes a bit more effort. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #44
BANKROLL 1020.85 units

MEDELLIN CHALLENGER

Pick number 022-G. Lama VS F.Bagnis

F.Bagnis to win @1.44--Stake 5 units

WIN LOSS SUMMARY 15--6
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #45
 Most people are betting for leisure...very few are betting for a living. The amount of time and effort to setup accounts to make your system work would not work for 99.9% of Covers users.  Honestly it isn't worth most professionals time either.

Challengers/ITF are very low limit bets at the few books that take them. 

Also N3 maes a good point ... not sure how you are betting 5 units on a wager and 100 on another.  If your system is what you say you would be better off flat betting



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:

 Most people are betting for leisure...very few are betting for a living. The amount of time and effort to setup accounts to make your system work would not work for 99.9% of Covers users.  Honestly it isn't worth most professionals time either.

Challengers/ITF are very low limit bets at the few books that take them. 

Also N3 maes a good point ... not sure how you are betting 5 units on a wager and 100 on another.  If your system is what you say you would be better off flat betting



Tell me how you know 99.9% of people couldn't make this work. Everything in life takes some effort to be truly successful even gambling. In fact it takes a lot more. That's why most don't even have a shot of being successful LONGTERM. They aren't prepared to go the extra mile.

Now educate me, fill me in on your circumstances. I am assuming you are American? Can only bet in Vegas, Atlantic city and few other places. Maybe some offshore online accounts. So you live in the land of the free but can't bet when and where you like? Makes no sense to me. You speak of limits, what are the limits on tennis stateside then?

Staking? The whole thing about raising and lowering stakes is CONFIDENCE. Knowing you have one of the greatest betting systems of alltime for one reason, and one reason only. SHORT LOSING STREAKS.

The thing that all gamblers fear is the unknown. But if you knew that you will rarely lose more than 4 times in a row. You start to fear little. No one has ever shown me a system that is stronger in that department. And I doubt they ever will. People pay thousands for picks for baseball and the rest. And still get stung by horrendous bankroll destroying losing streaks.

The passage of time will show many here that emigration or long vacations in the UK might be a good idea. Given you have the freedom to make some serious coin. Without having to have the ridiculous laws against you. That you have stateside.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #47
You keep mentioning system...please explain what your system is... because right now it looks like someone randomly picking -200 lines.... and when they lose you martingale to try and make up the difference.

You also clearly don't understand people very well. Setting up multiple accounts at multiple books and then managing them all and getting appropriate action is not something that many are going to do in order to follow some random ahole on Covers.

Actually if you had confidence you would flat bet. You are claiming to be 12% above break even point. Meaning over the 8000 wagers you claim would put you around 960 units up if you flat wagered. Meaning a $100 bettor would be up almost $100,000 and a $1,000 bettor would be up almost a million.

Personally I think you are 100% full of sh*t. If you did have a system that was ultra successful you wouldn't be sharing it for free on Covers. I suspect you are just another tout wannabe using monopoly wagers in hopes of gathering a following. Have seen it about a million times on this site through the years.

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:

You keep mentioning system...please explain what your system is... because right now it looks like someone randomly picking -200 lines.... and when they lose you martingale to try and make up the difference.

You also clearly don't understand people very well. Setting up multiple accounts at multiple books and then managing them all and getting appropriate action is not something that many are going to do in order to follow some random ahole on Covers.

Actually if you had confidence you would flat bet. You are claiming to be 12% above break even point. Meaning over the 8000 wagers you claim would put you around 960 units up if you flat wagered. Meaning a $100 bettor would be up almost $100,000 and a $1,000 bettor would be up almost a million.

Personally I think you are 100% full of sh*t. If you did have a system that was ultra successful you wouldn't be sharing it for free on Covers. I suspect you are just another tout wannabe using monopoly wagers in hopes of gathering a following. Have seen it about a million times on this site through the years.

 
THE ZONE is simple, You have a floor bet of 1.40 and a ceiling bet of 1.80. Under no circumstances do you bet outside of that zone. You can think what you like. The numbers will give you the reality check as time moves forward. You think anyone selling a system has anything better than what I'm laying here for zilch. Because I can tell you with absolute certainty you will never see anything like this ever.

Worry not how often a system wins. WORRY HOW OFTEN IT LOSES. Thats where the zone leaves everything I've ever seen for dead. Yes I'm claiming those numbers but better still I'm going to prove those numbers. That's the difference between me and the rest. When you say I don't know people. I think I know them pretty well. that's exactly why I know I can put this on here and not even one in a thousand will take any notice of it. We are programmed to believe no one gives you anything good for nothing.

Now you are about to find out thats not true. A friend of mine said if you had a virtual betting grail. You could advertise it on T.V the Internet. Have it printed on the side of every car. Billboards. Leaflets through people's doors. And not even one in a thousand would even try it.

And you know what? He is right. That's why I'm laying this on here for nothing. Maybe after a year one person might realise that this is about as good as it gets. And that will be their gain.

But you are wrong and you will be proven so with the passage of time. 



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #49
These are the actual numbers over the last 6 plus years.

TOTAL BETS 8023

WINS 6322 TIMES AVERAGE ODDS OF 0.53=3,350.66

LOSSES 1701 TIMES FLAT BET OF 1 UNIT

THE BOTTOM LINE=1,649.66 UNITS CLEAR PROFIT...
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #50
BANKROLL 1023.05 units

SUZHOU LADIES OPEN

Pick number 023-A.L.Friedsam VS Y.Y.Duan

A.L.Friedsam to win @1.67--Stake 3 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 16--6
All Forums | Tennis
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.