All Forums | Tennis

My tennis strategy THE ZONE.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 48812
Posts: 648
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 2527
Posted: #151
Can't wait to hit a parlay with you. I could use a nice hit Sentinel
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 4094
Posted: #152

Quote Originally Posted by p1edp1pper:

Hey Brother, i signed up to the forum just to say thank you for the picks. I have been following them for a while and never said thank you. So thank you, keep up the good work. 

play every fav between -140 and -200

that 100% of the plays bud

no need to scratch ur head on this one

70% win rate and 1 play away from being down units

1 dimensional player

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 4094
Posted: #153

u tell the guy that bet 2k and lost never to bet so much on one game

Calling in a 2 unit play (100$ per unit) for 200$ and the next play is 20 unit (2k) is a sure disaster

anyone can be in the zone with all fav (ask bubbles Mikeru) he has been hitting those numbers and been getting baked in the long run

I say to u, be more constant with ur playing units and picks some dogs!!

unless , u ll be just a memory

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #154
Quote Originally Posted by examine:

u tell the guy that bet 2k and lost never to bet so much on one game

Calling in a 2 unit play (100$ per unit) for 200$ and the next play is 20 unit (2k) is a sure disaster

anyone can be in the zone with all fav (ask bubbles Mikeru) he has been hitting those numbers and been getting baked in the long run

I say to u, be more constant with ur playing units and picks some dogs!!

unless , u ll be just a memory

Examine lets wait and see. 1.40 to 1.80 actually isn't all the favourites. Theres only one number you need to keep focused on.

65.40% as long as I stay above that LONGTERM. I make a profit LONGTERM. But that's not even the whole ball game. The real power of the zone isn't staying above that number. It's the flow of winning streaks and short losing streaks that makes it powerful.

There's plenty of back to back winners, trebles and beyond with this strategy. You could simply play it for parlays and clean up. I've had 37trebles this year. 6 of them came from that 18 match winning streak. Before that there were streaks of 9 matches and 7 matches.

That's where THERE REAL MONEY and POWER of this strategy lies. I'm using straight bets on here to proof the method and show it can stand up long term like that. But I make my REAL money from parlays. Lets be straight about that.




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 2767
Posted: #155
You are on fire mate keep up the good work. Any plays for later. ?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #156
Quote Originally Posted by Enjoi:

You are on fire mate keep up the good work. Any plays for later. ?
Hi Enjoi and thanks. Not right now. I will have a look and have another pick up around 5pm GMT UK time.

Byravikova won her match easily, giving me my 38th parlay treble of the year, so I'm happy about that. And my first streak beyond two since that monster streak of 18 last week. Lets see if we can get to four later.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 2767
Posted: #157
Sweet. Can't wait.

How long you been being tennis? Is this your bread and butter?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #158
Quote Originally Posted by Enjoi:

Sweet. Can't wait.

How long you been being tennis? Is this your bread and butter?
Ive been running this strategy since 2008. Going on 6.5 years now and it's never let me down. Parlays of two to three are my bread and butter. I'm not really a straight bettor.

And only do it for the exercise of showing this strategy is one of the best. I realised withing a few months of running this strategy, that it was winning back to back and beyond so often. It was a dream for rolling parlays. So that's what I started doing. So-called experts say never bet parlays. But that's in the sense of trying to pick two or more winning bets at the same time.

When you have a strategy like the ZONE that produces so many doubles, trebles and beyond. It's a no brainer where the real profits going to come from. Two or three favourites together is like betting on a dog. The difference is you will hit more often with the zone.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 4094
Posted: #159
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:

Examine lets wait and see. 1.40 to 1.80 actually isn't all the favourites. Theres only one number you need to keep focused on.

65.40% as long as I stay above that LONGTERM. I make a profit LONGTERM. But that's not even the whole ball game. The real power of the zone isn't staying above that number. It's the flow of winning streaks and short losing streaks that makes it powerful.

There's plenty of back to back winners, trebles and beyond with this strategy. You could simply play it for parlays and clean up. I've had 37trebles this year. 6 of them came from that 18 match winning streak. Before that there were streaks of 9 matches and 7 matches.

That's where THERE REAL MONEY and POWER of this strategy lies. I'm using straight bets on here to proof the method and show it can stand up long term like that. But I make my REAL money from parlays. Lets be straight about that.




 

Thx for the explanation

Parleys are good for those bets, I agree.

That changes the WHOLE math behind ur the music

My book (local) does not allow tennis parleys 

if not I would play them...

 

Ur units are most probably  far better then show here then

good work  

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 4094
Posted: #160
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:

Ive been running this strategy since 2008. Going on 6.5 years now and it's never let me down. Parlays of two to three are my bread and butter. I'm not really a straight bettor.

And only do it for the exercise of showing this strategy is one of the best. I realised withing a few months of running this strategy, that it was winning back to back and beyond so often. It was a dream for rolling parlays. So that's what I started doing. So-called experts say never bet parlays. But that's in the sense of trying to pick two or more winning bets at the same time.

When you have a strategy like the ZONE that produces so many doubles, trebles and beyond. It's a no brainer where the real profits going to come from. Two or three favourites together is like betting on a dog. The difference is you will hit more often with the zone.


if you been winning for 6 years straight in Tennis then ur definitely a pleasant anomaly ...

 

I would consider UPPING ur wagers to 100-500$ a unit at this point (if ur not betting that already)

but tell me, why jump from 2 to 5 to 10 to 10 units and go back and forth within those rages?

would it be easier to keep the same wager ?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 2767
Posted: #161
Quote Originally Posted by examine:

if you been winning for 6 years straight in Tennis then ur definitely a pleasant anomaly ...

 

I would consider UPPING ur wagers to 100-500$ a unit at this point (if ur not betting that already)

but tell me, why jump from 2 to 5 to 10 to 10 units and go back and forth within those rages?

would it be easier to keep the same wager ?


I actually believe this guy, which is a rarity on this site. Show me another guy who has gone 16 straight wins this year documented?

This guy is something else
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #162
Quote Originally Posted by Enjoi:


I actually believe this guy, which is a rarity on this site. Show me another guy who has gone 16 straight wins this year documented?

This guy is something else
Actually my streaks are 7~~9~~18 since I started posting. The last one was a freak run dont expect that every week lol.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #163
Quote Originally Posted by examine:

if you been winning for 6 years straight in Tennis then ur definitely a pleasant anomaly ...

 

I would consider UPPING ur wagers to 100-500$ a unit at this point (if ur not betting that already)

but tell me, why jump from 2 to 5 to 10 to 10 units and go back and forth within those rages?

would it be easier to keep the same wager ?

Yes and no Examine, I dont like straight bets and I dont like losing. I also know the zone doesnt go beyond 4 loses in a row often. Thats why I raise. Upping stakes is hard if you want to go undetected

Greed is a killer, with what I Know I should be a millionaire. But im very cautious.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 2767
Posted: #164
Quote Originally Posted by Sentinel3:

Yes and no Examine, I dont like straight bets and I dont like losing. I also know the zone doesnt go beyond 4 loses in a row often. Thats why I raise. Upping stakes is hard if you want to go undetected

Greed is a killer, with what I Know I should be a millionaire. But im very cautious.

So it's basically Martingale but you've never lost 4 in a row. What are the unit sizes for each chase?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #165
Quote Originally Posted by Enjoi:


So it's basically Martingale but you've never lost 4 in a row. What are the unit sizes for each chase?
NOT classic martingale.This is how I would stake three losses. 1~1~2. Then 4 units on the 4th bet.

In over 8000 bets ive lost more than 4 times just 7 times. The longest ever being 6. I think that is pretty excellent. When you consider sports handicappers sell worse losing streaks.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 2527
Posted: #166
Will u post your parlays?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #167
Quote Originally Posted by Buzz44:

Will u post your parlays?
Andreozzi~Buchanan~Rybikova was the latest winning parlay Buzz, you roll the winning over. This is how u get past books that dont allow straight parlays.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #168
Hope you find some customers/suckers soon 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #169
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:

Hope you find some customers/suckers soon 
Customers? Why are you so negative?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 10039
Posted: #170
Any ahole can make up a system and use a martingale chase system using fake money. Problem is in the real world there are obstacles to using such systems.

You started this so called system making 20-40-60-100-120 unit wagers...and now are doing 1-3 and 5. Comes across as you are either clueless or were just trying to build a fake bankroll to make your units record look better.

Add some of the Safs in the thread and is little doubt in my mind that you are looking for customers... good luck gathering them. If somebody is dumb enough to believe this garbage they deserve to go broke. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2014
Posts: 96
Posted: #171
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:

Any ahole can make up a system and use a martingale chase system using fake money. Problem is in the real world there are obstacles to using such systems.

You started this so called system making 20-40-60-100-120 unit wagers...and now are doing 1-3 and 5. Comes across as you are either clueless or were just trying to build a fake bankroll to make your units record look better.

Add some of the Safs in the thread and is little doubt in my mind that you are looking for customers... good luck gathering them. If somebody is dumb enough to believe this garbage they deserve to go broke. 

Why the hell he should do that because ur sceptic. And why u need this be proven system? Why u care at all?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #172
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:

Any ahole can make up a system and use a martingale chase system using fake money. Problem is in the real world there are obstacles to using such systems.

You started this so called system making 20-40-60-100-120 unit wagers...and now are doing 1-3 and 5. Comes across as you are either clueless or were just trying to build a fake bankroll to make your units record look better.

Add some of the Safs in the thread and is little doubt in my mind that you are looking for customers... good luck gathering them. If somebody is dumb enough to believe this garbage they deserve to go broke. 
Can anyone fake a 75% strikerate and winning streaks in excess of 6 several times.

Save your bitterness Mr, this strategy will be on here for free for years to come. What I'm waiting for is that light bulb moment from you. When you realise you were wrong. And we will then see if you have the decency to apologise. Now that will be a moment.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 85
Posted: #173
Loll u the man Sentinel I love it !!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 2527
Posted: #174
Thank u brother
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 1382
Posted: #175
BANKROLL 1043.08 units

MOSELLE OPEN METZ FRANCE

Pick number 058-J.Janowicz VS J.Nieminen

J.Janowicz to win @1.57--Stake 5 units

WIN/LOSS SUMMARY 43--14

STRIKERATE 75.43%
All Forums | Tennis
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.