I remain unconvinced by your money management spiel however the parlay system seems to be ticking along solidly. Good work and good luck going forward....
0
I remain unconvinced by your money management spiel however the parlay system seems to be ticking along solidly. Good work and good luck going forward....
I remain unconvinced by your money management spiel however the parlay system seems to be ticking along solidly. Good work and good luck going forward....
The name of the game is PROFIT. How you arrive at it makes no difference. My staking may appear irratic and flawed. But its married to the strength of the zone. SHORT LOSING STREAKS.
At the end of the day, a method is only as strong as its weakest link. Im being very conservative at the moment. Because I am long overdue a losing streak the wrong side of 4. Its going too well. The idea us to lose low and win high. The parlay side of things is an alltime winner. Because you simply cannot stop those back to back winners.
Old thinking in this game dies hard. Most believe parlays are a bad thing. But if done in the right way. Theyre the easiest way to turn consisten profits. A few years from now that may have sunk in to a few more minds. We shall see...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
I remain unconvinced by your money management spiel however the parlay system seems to be ticking along solidly. Good work and good luck going forward....
The name of the game is PROFIT. How you arrive at it makes no difference. My staking may appear irratic and flawed. But its married to the strength of the zone. SHORT LOSING STREAKS.
At the end of the day, a method is only as strong as its weakest link. Im being very conservative at the moment. Because I am long overdue a losing streak the wrong side of 4. Its going too well. The idea us to lose low and win high. The parlay side of things is an alltime winner. Because you simply cannot stop those back to back winners.
Old thinking in this game dies hard. Most believe parlays are a bad thing. But if done in the right way. Theyre the easiest way to turn consisten profits. A few years from now that may have sunk in to a few more minds. We shall see...
Total nonsense as usual but entertaining as always - keep it coming!
More than simply entertaining if you want to make money
However, my question to you: if you don't like it his way, how would you do it? You see the great win rate at these odds, how would you play it? Obviously the best winning percentage in tennis. So what would you recommend playing instead knowing the winning percentage and average odds? No nonsense, just your plan?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
Total nonsense as usual but entertaining as always - keep it coming!
More than simply entertaining if you want to make money
However, my question to you: if you don't like it his way, how would you do it? You see the great win rate at these odds, how would you play it? Obviously the best winning percentage in tennis. So what would you recommend playing instead knowing the winning percentage and average odds? No nonsense, just your plan?
I'm saying it's nonsense to claim that it is parlays that are the reason he is winning. Consistently finding picks that are longer odds than they should be coupled with a money management style that won't leave you broke after a bad run is the key. So long as you have these you can play parlays singles spreads ML faves UDML whatever. In the long run you'll be ok with any bet style providing you have the two things I stated. Simple maths can show this irrefutably. Now THAT is what most people fail to understand! Best wishes to all....
0
I'm saying it's nonsense to claim that it is parlays that are the reason he is winning. Consistently finding picks that are longer odds than they should be coupled with a money management style that won't leave you broke after a bad run is the key. So long as you have these you can play parlays singles spreads ML faves UDML whatever. In the long run you'll be ok with any bet style providing you have the two things I stated. Simple maths can show this irrefutably. Now THAT is what most people fail to understand! Best wishes to all....
I'm saying it's nonsense to claim that it is parlays that are the reason he is winning. Consistently finding picks that are longer odds than they should be coupled with a money management style that won't leave you broke after a bad run is the key. So long as you have these you can play parlays singles spreads ML faves UDML whatever. In the long run you'll be ok with any bet style providing you have the two things I stated. Simple maths can show this irrefutably. Now THAT is what most people fail to understand! Best wishes to all....
Jules the part you are failing to understand is with the Zone LONG LOSING RUNS are none existent. Thats what has yet to register with you and many. And only time is going to make that clear. Tell a casino gambler playing blackjack or even chances in roulette that he will lose 5 times in a row once in every 1000 bets he places on average. And after his orgasm is over he will be smiling from ear to ear. Thats what I have here.
Time will tell that story...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
I'm saying it's nonsense to claim that it is parlays that are the reason he is winning. Consistently finding picks that are longer odds than they should be coupled with a money management style that won't leave you broke after a bad run is the key. So long as you have these you can play parlays singles spreads ML faves UDML whatever. In the long run you'll be ok with any bet style providing you have the two things I stated. Simple maths can show this irrefutably. Now THAT is what most people fail to understand! Best wishes to all....
Jules the part you are failing to understand is with the Zone LONG LOSING RUNS are none existent. Thats what has yet to register with you and many. And only time is going to make that clear. Tell a casino gambler playing blackjack or even chances in roulette that he will lose 5 times in a row once in every 1000 bets he places on average. And after his orgasm is over he will be smiling from ear to ear. Thats what I have here.
This thread makes zero sense. You claim you are playing parlays but what makes no sense is you supposedly risked 5 units on Marchenko but then are claiming the parlay is risking only 2 units. How can you have 5 units on Marchenko whether through traditional or open parlay and then claim later that the parlay is only for 2 units? The parlay would be for at least 5 units
0
This thread makes zero sense. You claim you are playing parlays but what makes no sense is you supposedly risked 5 units on Marchenko but then are claiming the parlay is risking only 2 units. How can you have 5 units on Marchenko whether through traditional or open parlay and then claim later that the parlay is only for 2 units? The parlay would be for at least 5 units
This thread makes zero sense. You claim you are playing parlays but what makes no sense is you supposedly risked 5 units on Marchenko but then are claiming the parlay is risking only 2 units. How can you have 5 units on Marchenko whether through traditional or open parlay and then claim later that the parlay is only for 2 units? The parlay would be for at least 5 units
The parlay can be whatever I want it to be its ROLLING. When you play a traditional parlay you are limited. You are forced to place a set amount there and then on two or more matches. You cannot respond to the variance of the losing streak.
Rolling parlays are vastly superior because A, you get MORE turnover. So for example if I win three matches in a row that equals two rolling parlays. With the spot parlay you would have to win 4 in a row to have two parlays.
And B, and more importantly I can be more flexible in my staking. Afterall how much you take a given bet up and down can mean the difference betweeb profit and loss in this game.
I wise enough to realize that factor ALONE can mean success or failure. Thats why the flawed thinking that you MUST win above a given percentage carries no weight with me. What you MUST do is win bigger than you lose the majority of the time.
Then even a 50% hit rate can prove profitable. The ROLLING parlay beats them all, because its the best of both worlds. Stage 1 represents the attempt to win a single and then the FIRST parlay. Stage 2 represents the attempt to string TWO or more rolling parlays together. The icing on the cake.
And as time will prove its an alltime winner. Every inching in the right direction.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:
This thread makes zero sense. You claim you are playing parlays but what makes no sense is you supposedly risked 5 units on Marchenko but then are claiming the parlay is risking only 2 units. How can you have 5 units on Marchenko whether through traditional or open parlay and then claim later that the parlay is only for 2 units? The parlay would be for at least 5 units
The parlay can be whatever I want it to be its ROLLING. When you play a traditional parlay you are limited. You are forced to place a set amount there and then on two or more matches. You cannot respond to the variance of the losing streak.
Rolling parlays are vastly superior because A, you get MORE turnover. So for example if I win three matches in a row that equals two rolling parlays. With the spot parlay you would have to win 4 in a row to have two parlays.
And B, and more importantly I can be more flexible in my staking. Afterall how much you take a given bet up and down can mean the difference betweeb profit and loss in this game.
I wise enough to realize that factor ALONE can mean success or failure. Thats why the flawed thinking that you MUST win above a given percentage carries no weight with me. What you MUST do is win bigger than you lose the majority of the time.
Then even a 50% hit rate can prove profitable. The ROLLING parlay beats them all, because its the best of both worlds. Stage 1 represents the attempt to win a single and then the FIRST parlay. Stage 2 represents the attempt to string TWO or more rolling parlays together. The icing on the cake.
And as time will prove its an alltime winner. Every inching in the right direction.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
