There was only one player with a J starting name in Stuggart when i posted this yesterday... I usually do that when names are too difficult to spell out and i havent copied and pasted, lol. but yes, i could have written struff.
it was a winner anyway - will post full name winners later. sorry about that!
0
There was only one player with a J starting name in Stuggart when i posted this yesterday... I usually do that when names are too difficult to spell out and i havent copied and pasted, lol. but yes, i could have written struff.
it was a winner anyway - will post full name winners later. sorry about that!
Mikla. your message was fuc*** pointless. get the F out of my thread you troll. I took escobedo with the LL, odds were -215 after the LL was added. my book almost always updates those match ups, that's why I bet with them: they update lines almost every 2 mins (rarely do they miss people pulling out). But yes, if you took him with Hyeon C you would have had a push.
For me it was a W. Happy win considering everyone was upset today in the men side that were larger chalks... I did take chardy as a dog live when he wouldnt go away and made some decent juice as well. Thanks to mitch for his insight which i agreed with.
thats why you see me post usually that late, i always wait to see if someone either pulls out or injuries.
6-6. on atp on this forum and 2-2 NCAA Baseball with LSU going 2-0 on MIS state. (got lucky they upset them in the 8-9th inning first game, and then they hit them out of the park second game.
I do bet chalk but i take my time before i bet them.
already thinking of a parlay for tomorrow
def prob gonna lay the full amount on fed against haas. he barely won against the young french boy PH whatever his name is. wasnt a convincing win at all, a spread would be great although i think the smart bet is just laying it all.
got lucky on friggin GSW last nite, took -8.5, i was cringing lol, friggin Smith throwing that three killed a parlay that would have paid me out 20$ to make 600 (person). but i laid my whole balance on that spread so i was sweating it lol
0
Mikla. your message was fuc*** pointless. get the F out of my thread you troll. I took escobedo with the LL, odds were -215 after the LL was added. my book almost always updates those match ups, that's why I bet with them: they update lines almost every 2 mins (rarely do they miss people pulling out). But yes, if you took him with Hyeon C you would have had a push.
For me it was a W. Happy win considering everyone was upset today in the men side that were larger chalks... I did take chardy as a dog live when he wouldnt go away and made some decent juice as well. Thanks to mitch for his insight which i agreed with.
thats why you see me post usually that late, i always wait to see if someone either pulls out or injuries.
6-6. on atp on this forum and 2-2 NCAA Baseball with LSU going 2-0 on MIS state. (got lucky they upset them in the 8-9th inning first game, and then they hit them out of the park second game.
I do bet chalk but i take my time before i bet them.
already thinking of a parlay for tomorrow
def prob gonna lay the full amount on fed against haas. he barely won against the young french boy PH whatever his name is. wasnt a convincing win at all, a spread would be great although i think the smart bet is just laying it all.
got lucky on friggin GSW last nite, took -8.5, i was cringing lol, friggin Smith throwing that three killed a parlay that would have paid me out 20$ to make 600 (person). but i laid my whole balance on that spread so i was sweating it lol
it's a forum, i post because i can. I've picked apart peoples monopoly bets on here and unless you guys are millionaires no one comes back from these 3400 dollar bets as losses. Yeah, I don't care to post lines because they change from book to book and i dont need to do your homework. lines will change 40-60 dollars maybe? You have a great theory on cilic, let's focus that he didnt lose and i havent lose a single dollar while most of you play on fumes. let me know when I start losing and we can have a convo. I didn't bet cilic ML if you read it was a three teamer. I post plays with just one player when it is straight chalk. When i post more than one never assume anyone would be stupid enough to bet each one individually - bird has been in much better forum than tomic who has tanked equally as bad as kygrious with less than half the talent. Cilic was spectacular on clay and his game translates wonderfully to grass against tips which has been subpar, and ivo played a kid who barely beat an injured brown. Not rocket science, but you guys dont derserve write ups. scal was on point - most of you follow and wait to jump all over people, so when respect is shown after 10 winners straight, maybe ill give you a write up on how im 100% so far.
0
it's a forum, i post because i can. I've picked apart peoples monopoly bets on here and unless you guys are millionaires no one comes back from these 3400 dollar bets as losses. Yeah, I don't care to post lines because they change from book to book and i dont need to do your homework. lines will change 40-60 dollars maybe? You have a great theory on cilic, let's focus that he didnt lose and i havent lose a single dollar while most of you play on fumes. let me know when I start losing and we can have a convo. I didn't bet cilic ML if you read it was a three teamer. I post plays with just one player when it is straight chalk. When i post more than one never assume anyone would be stupid enough to bet each one individually - bird has been in much better forum than tomic who has tanked equally as bad as kygrious with less than half the talent. Cilic was spectacular on clay and his game translates wonderfully to grass against tips which has been subpar, and ivo played a kid who barely beat an injured brown. Not rocket science, but you guys dont derserve write ups. scal was on point - most of you follow and wait to jump all over people, so when respect is shown after 10 winners straight, maybe ill give you a write up on how im 100% so far.
Lmao, I like you, you keep it real. We both know that won't happen but so far if you follow my account on pyckio I've been at 74-76% on atp over three years now. I hope I can keep that trend strong / so far this year it's going well. I don't believe in jinxes so I don't care stating that, I was referenced here by scal and another friend from a diff website bc of how well the nba cappers were only to find out a few were decent. I could have just kept those posts to myself but I wanted to gather a following, I don't really care for attention because if you're a serious bettor you know that what matters at the end of the day is your bank roll, not views. but agreed, - I'm glad you stuck to your guns and listened that lucie isn't a quitter, she's out of form but she's like Vik Azarenka**... They are pit bulls. And your spread ended up winning. gj!
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
I hope you remain 100% for a long time buddy
Lmao, I like you, you keep it real. We both know that won't happen but so far if you follow my account on pyckio I've been at 74-76% on atp over three years now. I hope I can keep that trend strong / so far this year it's going well. I don't believe in jinxes so I don't care stating that, I was referenced here by scal and another friend from a diff website bc of how well the nba cappers were only to find out a few were decent. I could have just kept those posts to myself but I wanted to gather a following, I don't really care for attention because if you're a serious bettor you know that what matters at the end of the day is your bank roll, not views. but agreed, - I'm glad you stuck to your guns and listened that lucie isn't a quitter, she's out of form but she's like Vik Azarenka**... They are pit bulls. And your spread ended up winning. gj!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.