Scal,
no he wouldn't be able to do that. Its a transaction over the threshold and will be logged as such with his ss number. There are also no forms to fill out as the play is already on their log sheet. the more plays he makes that are logged the supervisors will get to know him and although will still have to record the info for title 31..they wont be asking for his identity as he becomes a KNOWN player
Scal,
no he wouldn't be able to do that. Its a transaction over the threshold and will be logged as such with his ss number. There are also no forms to fill out as the play is already on their log sheet. the more plays he makes that are logged the supervisors will get to know him and although will still have to record the info for title 31..they wont be asking for his identity as he becomes a KNOWN player
Scal,
no he wouldn't be able to do that. Its a transaction over the threshold and will be logged as such with his ss number. There are also no forms to fill out as the play is already on their log sheet. the more plays he makes that are logged the supervisors will get to know him and although will still have to record the info for title 31..they wont be asking for his identity as he becomes a KNOWN player
I have to defer to JicJac here - I am sure he is right on this one.
And as CG said - he fell right in to being a known player when he filled out the players club application and got the players card. Now every bet he makes there will be tracked.
You can say no to the players card. They sound like they are demanding it when you make your bet - but they are asking in a way that strongly suggests it. At least at the SB where he made this bet (don't want to name it but noticed it on ticket). William Hill DEMANDED the players card when I tried to make a wager there - and I think that wager was only for 3k or so.
But make no mistake - CGs player card makes him a known player.
Scal,
no he wouldn't be able to do that. Its a transaction over the threshold and will be logged as such with his ss number. There are also no forms to fill out as the play is already on their log sheet. the more plays he makes that are logged the supervisors will get to know him and although will still have to record the info for title 31..they wont be asking for his identity as he becomes a KNOWN player
I have to defer to JicJac here - I am sure he is right on this one.
And as CG said - he fell right in to being a known player when he filled out the players club application and got the players card. Now every bet he makes there will be tracked.
You can say no to the players card. They sound like they are demanding it when you make your bet - but they are asking in a way that strongly suggests it. At least at the SB where he made this bet (don't want to name it but noticed it on ticket). William Hill DEMANDED the players card when I tried to make a wager there - and I think that wager was only for 3k or so.
But make no mistake - CGs player card makes him a known player.
I stopped betting MLB about 5 years ago. I had lost MB and Pinny at the time (I have since got them back), but I stopped about a month before they left the US market.
I left because their commission structure changed to where I think I was paying about .5 cent per bet - but they were changing it to where it would be a little over 1 cent per bet. I wrote about it extensively here at the time, and the agony of paying .5 cent more!
That .5 cent made me pack it in on MLB - probably forever. I just look at it in the context of betting in to 10 cent lines and I have to laugh - it is a different universe than I am used to. I can accept that CG is a much better pure handicapper than I am - but I cant accept the fact that he should be making MORE on every bet he makes.
That's the part that would make me not sleep at night. Not that I lost a wager, but that I didn't win enough on my winning wagers. Just a different mentality I guess - not better or worse - but I know what makes me money and profitable - and it is the pennies I can squeeze here and there. I am not good enough to find spots to bet 5k when my normal bet is 500. I need to win everything I possibly can on every dollar I risk - and that comes from getting the extra half penny when I can.
Yep. Unfortunately the penny and nickel lines vanished years ago. Now 10 cents is the very best out here that I know of.
However, we both know that until he realizes (what youve tried to explain several times now to no avail, the formula that he needs for bet size and number of bets per month to survive and make his nutt each month) he may as well be using a 50 cent line to stop the suffering quickly. Its simple math. He will run out of money!
I stopped betting MLB about 5 years ago. I had lost MB and Pinny at the time (I have since got them back), but I stopped about a month before they left the US market.
I left because their commission structure changed to where I think I was paying about .5 cent per bet - but they were changing it to where it would be a little over 1 cent per bet. I wrote about it extensively here at the time, and the agony of paying .5 cent more!
That .5 cent made me pack it in on MLB - probably forever. I just look at it in the context of betting in to 10 cent lines and I have to laugh - it is a different universe than I am used to. I can accept that CG is a much better pure handicapper than I am - but I cant accept the fact that he should be making MORE on every bet he makes.
That's the part that would make me not sleep at night. Not that I lost a wager, but that I didn't win enough on my winning wagers. Just a different mentality I guess - not better or worse - but I know what makes me money and profitable - and it is the pennies I can squeeze here and there. I am not good enough to find spots to bet 5k when my normal bet is 500. I need to win everything I possibly can on every dollar I risk - and that comes from getting the extra half penny when I can.
Yep. Unfortunately the penny and nickel lines vanished years ago. Now 10 cents is the very best out here that I know of.
However, we both know that until he realizes (what youve tried to explain several times now to no avail, the formula that he needs for bet size and number of bets per month to survive and make his nutt each month) he may as well be using a 50 cent line to stop the suffering quickly. Its simple math. He will run out of money!
yes, I can also say that casino's look for avoidance methods around title 31. example, he walks to the counter and wants to make a 2500 wager, and then returns minutes later (if the line is the same) and makes another 2500 wager. its at this point that the supervisor will make him put the play on ONE ticket. Now, yes there are folks that go unrecognized and are able to get past without being caught...but, I can tell you a staff that is wired in and knows what their doing will catch this move 95% of the time.
yes, I can also say that casino's look for avoidance methods around title 31. example, he walks to the counter and wants to make a 2500 wager, and then returns minutes later (if the line is the same) and makes another 2500 wager. its at this point that the supervisor will make him put the play on ONE ticket. Now, yes there are folks that go unrecognized and are able to get past without being caught...but, I can tell you a staff that is wired in and knows what their doing will catch this move 95% of the time.
Bluefin - yeah - you are correct. But it would have to be audited. And it doesn't show an amount or income. It just says "this guy had at least 10k in cash on him at this time".
The IRS is interested in income. So while it might be something they would be interested in - it is not necessarily something they would be interested in.
Bluefin - yeah - you are correct. But it would have to be audited. And it doesn't show an amount or income. It just says "this guy had at least 10k in cash on him at this time".
The IRS is interested in income. So while it might be something they would be interested in - it is not necessarily something they would be interested in.
WHEN
TDOG TOLD THE TRUTH YOU GUYS BANNED HIM. HE SAID THIS KID WAS A PSYCHO, A
SOCIOPATH...YOU GUYS BANNED HIM, BARON KEPT CURSING HIM. THE BIGGEST
PIECE OF SHITT ON THIS SITE NAMED THE HAWK, DIDN'T LISTEN, EVERYTHING TDOG SAID
CAME TRUE, AND HAWK LOOKS LIKE THE DUMB FUCKK NOW...HAVE YOU SEEN THESE VIDEOS?
THIS KID IS A DISASTER
Hey,
wassup, Dog? Glad I could make it to #1 on your list!
You know, you come up with
so many names and then get banned, it's hard to keep track!
You really are a LOSER. I
know you’ve been told that many times, but I’m just going to stick with your
amazing betting advice…….
I’m not going to go with
your 3-6-13 “system”………………it’s been a proven loser, as you should know from
your Dallas Maverick bet…………oopsie!
Back when you were a “writer
for the MGM Grand” you told CG to bet this:
Miami
Cleveland
And just to make sure how
great these bets were, to parlay them.
Well, Miami covered against
the Wizards on the road, but Cleveland lost outright to…………..wait for it………………………..THE
HAWKS!
I know. Ironic, isn’t it?
Big, tough, guy telling CG
what a loser he was, losing two $1100 bets………..
Yet, you shelled out $9900
(3x your ‘usual’ bet of $3300), won once, netting you $6300. Which means you
LOST $3600…………….and you’re giving advice?
Now, you call CG a
sociopath. What do you call someone that continues to create aliases over and
over again, getting banned each time, and keeps spouting the same thing over
and over again……………..and expects something to change?
I’ll say one thing for
CG-AT LEAST HE’S NOT A LIAR
WHEN
TDOG TOLD THE TRUTH YOU GUYS BANNED HIM. HE SAID THIS KID WAS A PSYCHO, A
SOCIOPATH...YOU GUYS BANNED HIM, BARON KEPT CURSING HIM. THE BIGGEST
PIECE OF SHITT ON THIS SITE NAMED THE HAWK, DIDN'T LISTEN, EVERYTHING TDOG SAID
CAME TRUE, AND HAWK LOOKS LIKE THE DUMB FUCKK NOW...HAVE YOU SEEN THESE VIDEOS?
THIS KID IS A DISASTER
Hey,
wassup, Dog? Glad I could make it to #1 on your list!
You know, you come up with
so many names and then get banned, it's hard to keep track!
You really are a LOSER. I
know you’ve been told that many times, but I’m just going to stick with your
amazing betting advice…….
I’m not going to go with
your 3-6-13 “system”………………it’s been a proven loser, as you should know from
your Dallas Maverick bet…………oopsie!
Back when you were a “writer
for the MGM Grand” you told CG to bet this:
Miami
Cleveland
And just to make sure how
great these bets were, to parlay them.
Well, Miami covered against
the Wizards on the road, but Cleveland lost outright to…………..wait for it………………………..THE
HAWKS!
I know. Ironic, isn’t it?
Big, tough, guy telling CG
what a loser he was, losing two $1100 bets………..
Yet, you shelled out $9900
(3x your ‘usual’ bet of $3300), won once, netting you $6300. Which means you
LOST $3600…………….and you’re giving advice?
Now, you call CG a
sociopath. What do you call someone that continues to create aliases over and
over again, getting banned each time, and keeps spouting the same thing over
and over again……………..and expects something to change?
I’ll say one thing for
CG-AT LEAST HE’S NOT A LIAR
Early in the thread, you solicit advice and talk about it.
Later in the thread - when things go south - you don't listen or want it.
No problems. Your thread, your shitshow. You know it all.
I will collect my 5k, give it to a charity in your honor - and something will come out of this other than weeks of entertainment in this thread.
But make no mistake. You are not a pro. You are heading back to a 9-5. This is just a vacation.
Early in the thread, you solicit advice and talk about it.
Later in the thread - when things go south - you don't listen or want it.
No problems. Your thread, your shitshow. You know it all.
I will collect my 5k, give it to a charity in your honor - and something will come out of this other than weeks of entertainment in this thread.
But make no mistake. You are not a pro. You are heading back to a 9-5. This is just a vacation.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.