CG, tough losses are part of the game. If you keep track of all the miracle finishes that you get to win games, you will see they even out.
Guys are gonna keep breaking your balls about how you never post any good info as to why you made your picks. All you keep saying is there were other things, but its weird that you never post the other things and instead post silly facts as reasons why you made the plays.
Maybe you have other reasons for your picks, but am starting to doubt it. You will go broke if this is truly how you pick games {ucla has been good to me in the past, so lets throw down 1k on them tonight}
I would expect since you are a pro now, you would have your own set of power ratings that you make and use as one of your first things that you use. I doubt you have your own numbers thou
This post here, little ones, is what they call "BAIT".
It can be identified by its SINKER...ball breaking will continue...
Its LINE....."Maybe you have other reasons for your picks, but am starting to doubt it."
And its HOOK..."I would expect since you are a pro now, you would have your own set of power ratings that you make and use as one of your first things that you use. I doubt you have your own numbers thou"
The reverse order of the traditional "Hook, Line and Sinker" is used in this case to put the suspicious fish at ease as he would never think he could be reeled in by "Sinker, Line and Hook".
However, the moron that is the fisherman, would never dispute anything that had absolutely NO writeup as long as it was hitting 57% or better long term.
"Oh no...that fish has GOT to be doing in depth research on every game he throws money at. Why, look at that sterling record!"
It's a wacky gamblers world we live in.
PM for the skinny on the down low
0
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
CG, tough losses are part of the game. If you keep track of all the miracle finishes that you get to win games, you will see they even out.
Guys are gonna keep breaking your balls about how you never post any good info as to why you made your picks. All you keep saying is there were other things, but its weird that you never post the other things and instead post silly facts as reasons why you made the plays.
Maybe you have other reasons for your picks, but am starting to doubt it. You will go broke if this is truly how you pick games {ucla has been good to me in the past, so lets throw down 1k on them tonight}
I would expect since you are a pro now, you would have your own set of power ratings that you make and use as one of your first things that you use. I doubt you have your own numbers thou
This post here, little ones, is what they call "BAIT".
It can be identified by its SINKER...ball breaking will continue...
Its LINE....."Maybe you have other reasons for your picks, but am starting to doubt it."
And its HOOK..."I would expect since you are a pro now, you would have your own set of power ratings that you make and use as one of your first things that you use. I doubt you have your own numbers thou"
The reverse order of the traditional "Hook, Line and Sinker" is used in this case to put the suspicious fish at ease as he would never think he could be reeled in by "Sinker, Line and Hook".
However, the moron that is the fisherman, would never dispute anything that had absolutely NO writeup as long as it was hitting 57% or better long term.
"Oh no...that fish has GOT to be doing in depth research on every game he throws money at. Why, look at that sterling record!"
"That's how you step up! When they say it's all done, what do we do? We phukin fight! That's how you step up! Somone wants me to pack my bags? Come out here and phukin make me! Come out here and phukin make me! Ready for a streak now. Spurs first half....Spurs full game baby!"
The Legend, College Gambler
0
We need another video PRONTO!
Give the people what they want!
"That's how you step up! When they say it's all done, what do we do? We phukin fight! That's how you step up! Somone wants me to pack my bags? Come out here and phukin make me! Come out here and phukin make me! Ready for a streak now. Spurs first half....Spurs full game baby!"
I really want CG to succeed. I just dont think he will because he wants action all day long and picks real tough games where there isnt much of an edge.
I was leaning Ohio St all day long. I had a feeling the line would move from the Buckeyes being favored to getting a point or 2. I pounded them at about 4-5 oclock for +2. OSU has best player in the BIG 10 imo with Deangelo Russell, Matta has the most BIG tourney wins since he became the coach at OSU, not Izzo. Better defensive efficiency, better eFG% on offense, turn the ball over less and force lots more turnovers (22nd in nation vs 293 for MSU), they also get to the free throw line slightly more and shoot a better percentage from the line. The only thing MSU does better is rebound.
I was also leaning Zona tonight but laid off it because I think the game can go either way. But gun to my head I would take Zona. I might even take Zona against Kentucky. I think Zona is very underrated and I think they roll through the Pac tourney while hoping Kentucky slips up and they can steal the #1 overall seed on Sunday.
So many times I see CG picking coin flip games and he always plays power conferences. If he spent time to learn the smaller conferences he could find tons of value in some of those games.
GL on your action CG My power rankings along with just about every other power ranking system available has OSU as the better team.
0
I really want CG to succeed. I just dont think he will because he wants action all day long and picks real tough games where there isnt much of an edge.
I was leaning Ohio St all day long. I had a feeling the line would move from the Buckeyes being favored to getting a point or 2. I pounded them at about 4-5 oclock for +2. OSU has best player in the BIG 10 imo with Deangelo Russell, Matta has the most BIG tourney wins since he became the coach at OSU, not Izzo. Better defensive efficiency, better eFG% on offense, turn the ball over less and force lots more turnovers (22nd in nation vs 293 for MSU), they also get to the free throw line slightly more and shoot a better percentage from the line. The only thing MSU does better is rebound.
I was also leaning Zona tonight but laid off it because I think the game can go either way. But gun to my head I would take Zona. I might even take Zona against Kentucky. I think Zona is very underrated and I think they roll through the Pac tourney while hoping Kentucky slips up and they can steal the #1 overall seed on Sunday.
So many times I see CG picking coin flip games and he always plays power conferences. If he spent time to learn the smaller conferences he could find tons of value in some of those games.
GL on your action CG My power rankings along with just about every other power ranking system available has OSU as the better team.
I really want CG to succeed. I just dont think he will because he wants action all day long and picks real tough games where there isnt much of an edge.
I was leaning Ohio St all day long. I had a feeling the line would move from the Buckeyes being favored to getting a point or 2. I pounded them at about 4-5 oclock for +2. OSU has best player in the BIG 10 imo with Deangelo Russell, Matta has the most BIG tourney wins since he became the coach at OSU, not Izzo. Better defensive efficiency, better eFG% on offense, turn the ball over less and force lots more turnovers (22nd in nation vs 293 for MSU), they also get to the free throw line slightly more and shoot a better percentage from the line. The only thing MSU does better is rebound.
I was also leaning Zona tonight but laid off it because I think the game can go either way. But gun to my head I would take Zona. I might even take Zona against Kentucky. I think Zona is very underrated and I think they roll through the Pac tourney while hoping Kentucky slips up and they can steal the #1 overall seed on Sunday.
So many times I see CG picking coin flip games and he always plays power conferences. If he spent time to learn the smaller conferences he could find tons of value in some of those games.
GL on your action CG My power rankings along with just about every other power ranking system available has OSU as the better team.
I usually try to avoid posting opinions in this thread but there isn't a chance in hell Kentucky loses the number one overall seed. They could lose to Auburn by 50 and they'd get the overall one.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpero:
I really want CG to succeed. I just dont think he will because he wants action all day long and picks real tough games where there isnt much of an edge.
I was leaning Ohio St all day long. I had a feeling the line would move from the Buckeyes being favored to getting a point or 2. I pounded them at about 4-5 oclock for +2. OSU has best player in the BIG 10 imo with Deangelo Russell, Matta has the most BIG tourney wins since he became the coach at OSU, not Izzo. Better defensive efficiency, better eFG% on offense, turn the ball over less and force lots more turnovers (22nd in nation vs 293 for MSU), they also get to the free throw line slightly more and shoot a better percentage from the line. The only thing MSU does better is rebound.
I was also leaning Zona tonight but laid off it because I think the game can go either way. But gun to my head I would take Zona. I might even take Zona against Kentucky. I think Zona is very underrated and I think they roll through the Pac tourney while hoping Kentucky slips up and they can steal the #1 overall seed on Sunday.
So many times I see CG picking coin flip games and he always plays power conferences. If he spent time to learn the smaller conferences he could find tons of value in some of those games.
GL on your action CG My power rankings along with just about every other power ranking system available has OSU as the better team.
I usually try to avoid posting opinions in this thread but there isn't a chance in hell Kentucky loses the number one overall seed. They could lose to Auburn by 50 and they'd get the overall one.
"I'd like them to win by two or more". On a line of -1.5.
He doesn't care if he's a half point over, which of course with a missed FT could be a .5 pt under. And he knows this quite well right now.
The secret to betting a -1.5 pt favorite? Be confident they will win by 7 to 10. Not 2.
And yet another vigged day thusfar, WLWLWLWLWLWLWL, the vigorish eating away at him like an intestinal parasite.
He's right. Without the $5.5K bomb he'd down far less.
But that's not good enough. Not for a pro.
Most of us here work. What have we made in a month? A lot more than he has so far! And that's even without a 5.5K bet. And it doesn't matter what you do for a living!
Even if you work at Target as a cashier you are way up on him. And no one, NO ONE, with a job is 'down'. That's why we have jobs.
You need winners CG and you need to do a better job capping instead of the action junkie capping you are doing now to have a Vegas-esque Friday night.
Here comes yet another 1-1. You can see it from a billion miles away.1-1 isn't going to work...days pass. Food bills/utilities/gas/rent...all eating away at your life savings.
Like sand in an hour glass, its all slowly fading away.
Unless you change your ways...
Did you play the Knicks Over 40 wins?
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
And there it is folks.
"I'd like them to win by two or more". On a line of -1.5.
He doesn't care if he's a half point over, which of course with a missed FT could be a .5 pt under. And he knows this quite well right now.
The secret to betting a -1.5 pt favorite? Be confident they will win by 7 to 10. Not 2.
And yet another vigged day thusfar, WLWLWLWLWLWLWL, the vigorish eating away at him like an intestinal parasite.
He's right. Without the $5.5K bomb he'd down far less.
But that's not good enough. Not for a pro.
Most of us here work. What have we made in a month? A lot more than he has so far! And that's even without a 5.5K bet. And it doesn't matter what you do for a living!
Even if you work at Target as a cashier you are way up on him. And no one, NO ONE, with a job is 'down'. That's why we have jobs.
You need winners CG and you need to do a better job capping instead of the action junkie capping you are doing now to have a Vegas-esque Friday night.
Here comes yet another 1-1. You can see it from a billion miles away.1-1 isn't going to work...days pass. Food bills/utilities/gas/rent...all eating away at your life savings.
Like sand in an hour glass, its all slowly fading away.
I really want CG to succeed. I just dont think he will because he wants action all day long and picks real tough games where there isnt much of an edge.
I was leaning Ohio St all day long. I had a feeling the line would move from the Buckeyes being favored to getting a point or 2. I pounded them at about 4-5 oclock for +2. OSU has best player in the BIG 10 imo with Deangelo Russell, Matta has the most BIG tourney wins since he became the coach at OSU, not Izzo. Better defensive efficiency, better eFG% on offense, turn the ball over less and force lots more turnovers (22nd in nation vs 293 for MSU), they also get to the free throw line slightly more and shoot a better percentage from the line. The only thing MSU does better is rebound.
I was also leaning Zona tonight but laid off it because I think the game can go either way. But gun to my head I would take Zona. I might even take Zona against Kentucky. I think Zona is very underrated and I think they roll through the Pac tourney while hoping Kentucky slips up and they can steal the #1 overall seed on Sunday.
So many times I see CG picking coin flip games and he always plays power conferences. If he spent time to learn the smaller conferences he could find tons of value in some of those games.
GL on your action CG My power rankings along with just about every other power ranking system available has OSU as the better team.
Your post is a perfect example of why i called his mich st play out. You got solid numbers behind ohio st being the better team. His view is izzo is tough in tourneys. Yeah when hes got good teams
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpero:
I really want CG to succeed. I just dont think he will because he wants action all day long and picks real tough games where there isnt much of an edge.
I was leaning Ohio St all day long. I had a feeling the line would move from the Buckeyes being favored to getting a point or 2. I pounded them at about 4-5 oclock for +2. OSU has best player in the BIG 10 imo with Deangelo Russell, Matta has the most BIG tourney wins since he became the coach at OSU, not Izzo. Better defensive efficiency, better eFG% on offense, turn the ball over less and force lots more turnovers (22nd in nation vs 293 for MSU), they also get to the free throw line slightly more and shoot a better percentage from the line. The only thing MSU does better is rebound.
I was also leaning Zona tonight but laid off it because I think the game can go either way. But gun to my head I would take Zona. I might even take Zona against Kentucky. I think Zona is very underrated and I think they roll through the Pac tourney while hoping Kentucky slips up and they can steal the #1 overall seed on Sunday.
So many times I see CG picking coin flip games and he always plays power conferences. If he spent time to learn the smaller conferences he could find tons of value in some of those games.
GL on your action CG My power rankings along with just about every other power ranking system available has OSU as the better team.
Your post is a perfect example of why i called his mich st play out. You got solid numbers behind ohio st being the better team. His view is izzo is tough in tourneys. Yeah when hes got good teams
This post here, little ones, is what they call "BAIT".
It can be identified by its SINKER...ball breaking will continue...
Its LINE....."Maybe you have other reasons for your picks, but am starting to doubt it."
And its HOOK..."I would expect since you are a pro now, you would have your own set of power ratings that you make and use as one of your first things that you use. I doubt you have your own numbers thou"
The reverse order of the traditional "Hook, Line and Sinker" is used in this case to put the suspicious fish at ease as he would never think he could be reeled in by "Sinker, Line and Hook".
However, the moron that is the fisherman, would never dispute anything that had absolutely NO writeup as long as it was hitting 57% or better long term.
"Oh no...that fish has GOT to be doing in depth research on every game he throws money at. Why, look at that sterling record!"
It's a wacky gamblers world we live in.
Yes. Always shake my head at all these folks advocating making power rankings. Thinking they are gonna do better than espn or some of these other sites with all kinds of money, computer algorithms, research input, experts on hand, etc.
There are a lotta of cappers that don't even use power ranking at all to cap. Maybe you can refer to an experts PR to see if it supports your play. But huge waste of time---especially if that is not your handicapping style.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter:
This post here, little ones, is what they call "BAIT".
It can be identified by its SINKER...ball breaking will continue...
Its LINE....."Maybe you have other reasons for your picks, but am starting to doubt it."
And its HOOK..."I would expect since you are a pro now, you would have your own set of power ratings that you make and use as one of your first things that you use. I doubt you have your own numbers thou"
The reverse order of the traditional "Hook, Line and Sinker" is used in this case to put the suspicious fish at ease as he would never think he could be reeled in by "Sinker, Line and Hook".
However, the moron that is the fisherman, would never dispute anything that had absolutely NO writeup as long as it was hitting 57% or better long term.
"Oh no...that fish has GOT to be doing in depth research on every game he throws money at. Why, look at that sterling record!"
It's a wacky gamblers world we live in.
Yes. Always shake my head at all these folks advocating making power rankings. Thinking they are gonna do better than espn or some of these other sites with all kinds of money, computer algorithms, research input, experts on hand, etc.
There are a lotta of cappers that don't even use power ranking at all to cap. Maybe you can refer to an experts PR to see if it supports your play. But huge waste of time---especially if that is not your handicapping style.
I usually try to avoid posting opinions in this thread but there isn't a chance in hell Kentucky loses the number one overall seed. They could lose to Auburn by 50 and they'd get the overall one.
You are correct.
I just think Kentucky is extremely overrated this year becuase the SEC wasn't that great a conference. Dont think they were challenged or pushed enough to see who they truly are. They have completed a terrific regular season but lets see what the postseason brings.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
I usually try to avoid posting opinions in this thread but there isn't a chance in hell Kentucky loses the number one overall seed. They could lose to Auburn by 50 and they'd get the overall one.
You are correct.
I just think Kentucky is extremely overrated this year becuase the SEC wasn't that great a conference. Dont think they were challenged or pushed enough to see who they truly are. They have completed a terrific regular season but lets see what the postseason brings.
"I'd like them to win by two or more". On a line of -1.5.
He doesn't care if he's a half point over, which of course with a missed FT could be a .5 pt under. And he knows this quite well right now.
The secret to betting a -1.5 pt favorite? Be confident they will win by 7 to 10. Not 2.
And yet another vigged day thusfar, WLWLWLWLWLWLWL, the vigorish eating away at him like an intestinal parasite.
He's right. Without the $5.5K bomb he'd down far less.
But that's not good enough. Not for a pro.
Most of us here work. What have we made in a month? A lot more than he has so far! And that's even without a 5.5K bet. And it doesn't matter what you do for a living!
Even if you work at Target as a cashier you are way up on him. And no one, NO ONE, with a job is 'down'. That's why we have jobs.
You need winners CG and you need to do a better job capping instead of the action junkie capping you are doing now to have a Vegas-esque Friday night.
Here comes yet another 1-1. You can see it from a billion miles away.1-1 isn't going to work...days pass. Food bills/utilities/gas/rent...all eating away at your life savings.
Like sand in an hour glass, its all slowly fading away.
Unless you change your ways...
Come on Scal, you cant use quotation marks to quote the man and then not actually quote him, but make it sound worse to help your argument.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
And there it is folks.
"I'd like them to win by two or more". On a line of -1.5.
He doesn't care if he's a half point over, which of course with a missed FT could be a .5 pt under. And he knows this quite well right now.
The secret to betting a -1.5 pt favorite? Be confident they will win by 7 to 10. Not 2.
And yet another vigged day thusfar, WLWLWLWLWLWLWL, the vigorish eating away at him like an intestinal parasite.
He's right. Without the $5.5K bomb he'd down far less.
But that's not good enough. Not for a pro.
Most of us here work. What have we made in a month? A lot more than he has so far! And that's even without a 5.5K bet. And it doesn't matter what you do for a living!
Even if you work at Target as a cashier you are way up on him. And no one, NO ONE, with a job is 'down'. That's why we have jobs.
You need winners CG and you need to do a better job capping instead of the action junkie capping you are doing now to have a Vegas-esque Friday night.
Here comes yet another 1-1. You can see it from a billion miles away.1-1 isn't going to work...days pass. Food bills/utilities/gas/rent...all eating away at your life savings.
Like sand in an hour glass, its all slowly fading away.
Unless you change your ways...
Come on Scal, you cant use quotation marks to quote the man and then not actually quote him, but make it sound worse to help your argument.
I have a question... How many wagers on average does a professional sports bettor place on a weekly basis/monthly basis?
Every single one that fits your 'system' or where you see value or an edge. Especially if you are hitting 57% and trying to build up your bankroll in a hurry.
Couldn't tell if you were serious or not.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Canada_Chris:
I have a question... How many wagers on average does a professional sports bettor place on a weekly basis/monthly basis?
Every single one that fits your 'system' or where you see value or an edge. Especially if you are hitting 57% and trying to build up your bankroll in a hurry.
I hate to burst your bubble, but the real pros who do this everyday for a real living, almost always know which way the line is going to move. Thats why their pros and you are just a fly by the seat of your pants bettor.
Thats complete bull$hit.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
I hate to burst your bubble, but the real pros who do this everyday for a real living, almost always know which way the line is going to move. Thats why their pros and you are just a fly by the seat of your pants bettor.
I just think Kentucky is extremely overrated this year becuase the SEC wasn't that great a conference. Dont think they were challenged or pushed enough to see who they truly are. They have completed a terrific regular season but lets see what the postseason brings.
Agreed. I will definitely be looking for that first good spot in the tourney where Kentucky gets lackadaisical in the first half and is behind at halftime. It's going to be a great spot.
PM for the skinny on the down low
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpero:
You are correct.
I just think Kentucky is extremely overrated this year becuase the SEC wasn't that great a conference. Dont think they were challenged or pushed enough to see who they truly are. They have completed a terrific regular season but lets see what the postseason brings.
Agreed. I will definitely be looking for that first good spot in the tourney where Kentucky gets lackadaisical in the first half and is behind at halftime. It's going to be a great spot.
I really want CG to succeed. I just dont think he will because he wants action all day long and picks real tough games where there isnt much of an edge.
I was leaning Ohio St all day long. I had a feeling the line would move from the Buckeyes being favored to getting a point or 2. I pounded them at about 4-5 oclock for +2. OSU has best player in the BIG 10 imo with Deangelo Russell, Matta has the most BIG tourney wins since he became the coach at OSU, not Izzo. Better defensive efficiency, better eFG% on offense, turn the ball over less and force lots more turnovers (22nd in nation vs 293 for MSU), they also get to the free throw line slightly more and shoot a better percentage from the line. The only thing MSU does better is rebound.
I was also leaning Zona tonight but laid off it because I think the game can go either way. But gun to my head I would take Zona. I might even take Zona against Kentucky. I think Zona is very underrated and I think they roll through the Pac tourney while hoping Kentucky slips up and they can steal the #1 overall seed on Sunday.
So many times I see CG picking coin flip games and he always plays power conferences. If he spent time to learn the smaller conferences he could find tons of value in some of those games.
GL on your action CG My power rankings along with just about every other power ranking system available has OSU as the better team.
Good news to see this! Another power ranking guru that is taking a 43% play. I like it. Please continue posting plays.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jpero:
I really want CG to succeed. I just dont think he will because he wants action all day long and picks real tough games where there isnt much of an edge.
I was leaning Ohio St all day long. I had a feeling the line would move from the Buckeyes being favored to getting a point or 2. I pounded them at about 4-5 oclock for +2. OSU has best player in the BIG 10 imo with Deangelo Russell, Matta has the most BIG tourney wins since he became the coach at OSU, not Izzo. Better defensive efficiency, better eFG% on offense, turn the ball over less and force lots more turnovers (22nd in nation vs 293 for MSU), they also get to the free throw line slightly more and shoot a better percentage from the line. The only thing MSU does better is rebound.
I was also leaning Zona tonight but laid off it because I think the game can go either way. But gun to my head I would take Zona. I might even take Zona against Kentucky. I think Zona is very underrated and I think they roll through the Pac tourney while hoping Kentucky slips up and they can steal the #1 overall seed on Sunday.
So many times I see CG picking coin flip games and he always plays power conferences. If he spent time to learn the smaller conferences he could find tons of value in some of those games.
GL on your action CG My power rankings along with just about every other power ranking system available has OSU as the better team.
Good news to see this! Another power ranking guru that is taking a 43% play. I like it. Please continue posting plays.
"I'd like them to win by two or more". On a line of -1.5.
He doesn't care if he's a half point over, which of course with a missed FT could be a .5 pt under. And he knows this quite well right now.
The secret to betting a -1.5 pt favorite? Be confident they will win by 7 to 10. Not 2.
And yet another vigged day thusfar, WLWLWLWLWLWLWL, the vigorish eating away at him like an intestinal parasite.
He's right. Without the $5.5K bomb he'd down far less.
But that's not good enough. Not for a pro.
Most of us here work. What have we made in a month? A lot more than he has so far! And that's even without a 5.5K bet. And it doesn't matter what you do for a living!
Even if you work at Target as a cashier you are way up on him. And no one, NO ONE, with a job is 'down'. That's why we have jobs.
You need winners CG and you need to do a better job capping instead of the action junkie capping you are doing now to have a Vegas-esque Friday night.
Here comes yet another 1-1. You can see it from a billion miles away.1-1 isn't going to work...days pass. Food bills/utilities/gas/rent...all eating away at your life savings.
Like sand in an hour glass, its all slowly fading away.
Unless you change your ways...
Hahahahaha, this is one of the funniest posts by Scal. Anybody with a job is literally up compared to CG. Haha too funny. And then you mention the bills piling up, haha so evil.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
And there it is folks.
"I'd like them to win by two or more". On a line of -1.5.
He doesn't care if he's a half point over, which of course with a missed FT could be a .5 pt under. And he knows this quite well right now.
The secret to betting a -1.5 pt favorite? Be confident they will win by 7 to 10. Not 2.
And yet another vigged day thusfar, WLWLWLWLWLWLWL, the vigorish eating away at him like an intestinal parasite.
He's right. Without the $5.5K bomb he'd down far less.
But that's not good enough. Not for a pro.
Most of us here work. What have we made in a month? A lot more than he has so far! And that's even without a 5.5K bet. And it doesn't matter what you do for a living!
Even if you work at Target as a cashier you are way up on him. And no one, NO ONE, with a job is 'down'. That's why we have jobs.
You need winners CG and you need to do a better job capping instead of the action junkie capping you are doing now to have a Vegas-esque Friday night.
Here comes yet another 1-1. You can see it from a billion miles away.1-1 isn't going to work...days pass. Food bills/utilities/gas/rent...all eating away at your life savings.
Like sand in an hour glass, its all slowly fading away.
Unless you change your ways...
Hahahahaha, this is one of the funniest posts by Scal. Anybody with a job is literally up compared to CG. Haha too funny. And then you mention the bills piling up, haha so evil.
How's that funny? He knew bills would pile up going in. This is the plan. The plan was to quit the steady job. People that are working are NOT all ahead of him. They have credit cars, loans, etc.
Was a bad post---
0
How's that funny? He knew bills would pile up going in. This is the plan. The plan was to quit the steady job. People that are working are NOT all ahead of him. They have credit cars, loans, etc.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Fantastic.
Hot Forum Topics
