you must realise this is stupid??there is no prescribed "pattern" to when losses or wins occur...yes,it is true that he was due to regress back to the 50's or maybe early 60's in % at some point along the way but predicting how and when is a fools errand,there is no specific math to it...he could well have reeled off another 5 straight wins and then after that hit a huge slump and lost 12 in a row,you just cant tell...im absolutely positive you didnt know that his "pattern" would start off at over 65%,right??
you must realise this is stupid??there is no prescribed "pattern" to when losses or wins occur...yes,it is true that he was due to regress back to the 50's or maybe early 60's in % at some point along the way but predicting how and when is a fools errand,there is no specific math to it...he could well have reeled off another 5 straight wins and then after that hit a huge slump and lost 12 in a row,you just cant tell...im absolutely positive you didnt know that his "pattern" would start off at over 65%,right??
heres the only problem though and its staggering that you cant see it.....THOSE GUYS all contributed something to the place,which was winners for several weeks and im sure more than a few people caught onto those hot streaks and made a little cash...and then they all went off to do their own thing,whether you agree with that or not who gives 2 shi.ts??its their perogative...im not really bothered either way,its a free world.if you think you can make money in whatever way you see fit then go ahead..no-one is forcing me or anyone else to go and give them money...now as far YOU are concerned,you are basically vermin/scum/trash that contributes nothing but negativity and criticism in here...you have provided NO picks and contributed NOTHING except to act like a local "cop' warning people of the "terrible" dangers that lie in waiting about the place
so you tell me,who is worse??
heres the only problem though and its staggering that you cant see it.....THOSE GUYS all contributed something to the place,which was winners for several weeks and im sure more than a few people caught onto those hot streaks and made a little cash...and then they all went off to do their own thing,whether you agree with that or not who gives 2 shi.ts??its their perogative...im not really bothered either way,its a free world.if you think you can make money in whatever way you see fit then go ahead..no-one is forcing me or anyone else to go and give them money...now as far YOU are concerned,you are basically vermin/scum/trash that contributes nothing but negativity and criticism in here...you have provided NO picks and contributed NOTHING except to act like a local "cop' warning people of the "terrible" dangers that lie in waiting about the place
so you tell me,who is worse??
Bingo!!!
Bingo!!!
AGREE 100
AGREE 100
You guys that don't see this deserve to go and pay him $200 and lose your money. THIS HAPPENS ALL THE TIME and has been happening for DECADES before the internet.
He will absolutely NOT maintain 70% - this one handle did - but the others no.
You guys that don't see this deserve to go and pay him $200 and lose your money. THIS HAPPENS ALL THE TIME and has been happening for DECADES before the internet.
He will absolutely NOT maintain 70% - this one handle did - but the others no.
THIS HAPPENS ALL THE TIME and has been happening for DECADES before the internet.
He will absolutely NOT maintain 70% - this one handle did - but the others no.
In the late 1970s a tout service bought a mailing list of sports fans (Sport Illustrated subscribers or some Vegas hotel list or whatever) and sent out 10,000 mailings of picks for Monday Night Football using regular mail. Half of those letters picked the fav the other half picks the dog. "Inside information straight from Vegas insider guaranteed to win, bet the ranch!"
5,000 people got a winning pick.
Next week 2,500 got the fav and the other half got the dog.
1,250 people have gotten 2 mails and this tout is 2-0
625 = 3-0
312 = 4-0 and in that 4th pick was instructions on how to pay for this guaranteed Vegas Insider service $300 a pick.
156 = 5-0 No more picks until you pay.
They made a lot of money and obviously some of the letter receivers that got 4-1 still signed up.
Making a buttload of handles here and making a bunch of picks that go against each other you're going to get a handle that hits +60%.
Then once everyone is watching that handle when it starts to go sour, "Everyone is negative, I'm a whiny little bítch who didn't know that grubby sports gambling degenerates on the internet could be so cruel - I'm going private on Twitter and you all can pay for my picks".
Even if the guy just has this one particular handle and not a bunch of others and all of his picks are on the square HE'S ONLY BEEN DOING IT HERE FOR a little over 4 weeks.
We have regular shmoes go on 70% streaks a lot.
Find a Covers poster or any tout, or anyone you know who is hitting >70% year in and year out in a particular sport, or 6 months at a time. Anyone bozo can go on a tear for a couple of weeks - ESPECIALLY if you have 50 handles to play with from the start.
THIS HAPPENS ALL THE TIME and has been happening for DECADES before the internet.
He will absolutely NOT maintain 70% - this one handle did - but the others no.
In the late 1970s a tout service bought a mailing list of sports fans (Sport Illustrated subscribers or some Vegas hotel list or whatever) and sent out 10,000 mailings of picks for Monday Night Football using regular mail. Half of those letters picked the fav the other half picks the dog. "Inside information straight from Vegas insider guaranteed to win, bet the ranch!"
5,000 people got a winning pick.
Next week 2,500 got the fav and the other half got the dog.
1,250 people have gotten 2 mails and this tout is 2-0
625 = 3-0
312 = 4-0 and in that 4th pick was instructions on how to pay for this guaranteed Vegas Insider service $300 a pick.
156 = 5-0 No more picks until you pay.
They made a lot of money and obviously some of the letter receivers that got 4-1 still signed up.
Making a buttload of handles here and making a bunch of picks that go against each other you're going to get a handle that hits +60%.
Then once everyone is watching that handle when it starts to go sour, "Everyone is negative, I'm a whiny little bítch who didn't know that grubby sports gambling degenerates on the internet could be so cruel - I'm going private on Twitter and you all can pay for my picks".
Even if the guy just has this one particular handle and not a bunch of others and all of his picks are on the square HE'S ONLY BEEN DOING IT HERE FOR a little over 4 weeks.
We have regular shmoes go on 70% streaks a lot.
Find a Covers poster or any tout, or anyone you know who is hitting >70% year in and year out in a particular sport, or 6 months at a time. Anyone bozo can go on a tear for a couple of weeks - ESPECIALLY if you have 50 handles to play with from the start.
Correction:
5,000 people got a winning pick. 1-0
Next week 2,500 got the fav and the other half got the dog. 2-0
1,250 people have gotten 2 mails and this tout is 3-0
625 = 4-0 and in that 4th pick was instructions on how to pay for this guaranteed Vegas Insider service $300 a pick.
312 = 5-0 No more picks until you pay.
Correction:
5,000 people got a winning pick. 1-0
Next week 2,500 got the fav and the other half got the dog. 2-0
1,250 people have gotten 2 mails and this tout is 3-0
625 = 4-0 and in that 4th pick was instructions on how to pay for this guaranteed Vegas Insider service $300 a pick.
312 = 5-0 No more picks until you pay.
thats terrific and all and i wouldnt dispute it in any way but in the end if anyone is dumb enough to fall for that then thats their problem,i know i havent paid a cent for anything from this place and never would...and you have to point out how it relates to the 2 people in question for it to be relevant...methodologist and toscana were not on opposite sides of games and both(or the same if they are one guy) were hot so in the end maybe they were and maybe they werent scamming,we dont know but its an empty accusation to link them in this manner without knowing...regardless of anything its any persons choice to follow or fade whoever the fugg they want,surely?
thats terrific and all and i wouldnt dispute it in any way but in the end if anyone is dumb enough to fall for that then thats their problem,i know i havent paid a cent for anything from this place and never would...and you have to point out how it relates to the 2 people in question for it to be relevant...methodologist and toscana were not on opposite sides of games and both(or the same if they are one guy) were hot so in the end maybe they were and maybe they werent scamming,we dont know but its an empty accusation to link them in this manner without knowing...regardless of anything its any persons choice to follow or fade whoever the fugg they want,surely?
He will go 9-26. We all know what happed to fhose who went tout.
He will go 9-26. We all know what happed to fhose who went tout.
Aight!
Aight!
So you gave him your email address because you thought he was cute?
So you gave him your email address because you thought he was cute?
How does anyone know any of these guys here on Covers don't have 50 handles here and 50 on 6 or 8 of other sites. Sooner or later they're going to end up with a solid winner on one of the sites, maybe even 2 or three on the same site and zero on the other two, out of 300+ handles. Do the math.
Anyway follow a hot capper, why not? But if you are going to pay for picks don't even think about doing so unless this capper is tried and true with a few seasons under his belt and can be easily tracked on a website they do't own or pay. Like I said before any fool can hit 70% for a few weeks. It happens here all the time.
Flip a coin 100 times - you'll hit heads or tails 8 or 9 in a row once or twice and go 7 out of 10 at least 4 or 5 times in that 100. Binomial distribution.
How does anyone know any of these guys here on Covers don't have 50 handles here and 50 on 6 or 8 of other sites. Sooner or later they're going to end up with a solid winner on one of the sites, maybe even 2 or three on the same site and zero on the other two, out of 300+ handles. Do the math.
Anyway follow a hot capper, why not? But if you are going to pay for picks don't even think about doing so unless this capper is tried and true with a few seasons under his belt and can be easily tracked on a website they do't own or pay. Like I said before any fool can hit 70% for a few weeks. It happens here all the time.
Flip a coin 100 times - you'll hit heads or tails 8 or 9 in a row once or twice and go 7 out of 10 at least 4 or 5 times in that 100. Binomial distribution.
barneybeans is absolutely right in his comments here...
and anyways, if people are so impressed by such "records" or "hot" etc, all they have to do is go to king of covers weekly, find their a ton and start tailing
barneybeans is absolutely right in his comments here...
and anyways, if people are so impressed by such "records" or "hot" etc, all they have to do is go to king of covers weekly, find their a ton and start tailing
Yupe, especially MannyX . I have tailed these guys for awhile. Very profitable cappers. Only fools would thought these guys are bad people.
Yupe, especially MannyX . I have tailed these guys for awhile. Very profitable cappers. Only fools would thought these guys are bad people.
You can find a ton of such "profitable cappers" every week in king of covers weekly as I said, with even better records.
Also:
manny was cheating every day.
toscana had included a -165 ml and two non-existent lines in his record.
methodologist was legit.
And what barneybeans said
You can find a ton of such "profitable cappers" every week in king of covers weekly as I said, with even better records.
Also:
manny was cheating every day.
toscana had included a -165 ml and two non-existent lines in his record.
methodologist was legit.
And what barneybeans said
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.