All Forums | Website Promotions

Accuscore System Picks 11/21

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 19546
Posts: 205
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 682
Posted: #101
on his google docs sheet he had the star ratings which came from accuscore. his first tweet was classic. " it has come to my attention that my system is looking to be used for profit."
"i am not going to let someone use my system for their own profit"

this guys a tool.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 18
Posted: #102
Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

as of right now i got the celtics/pacers under 186 and the pelicans -6.5 against the cavs. 

Pacers total record 8-3 Celtics total record 9-4

pelicans side record 7-4 cavs side record 9-2


let me know if these qualify. pretty sure they do.


They do when you calculate the percentages of course, but the records for each side do seem higher than what he would show up. I mean look at the start of this thread, they all totalled less than 10, These picks have a combined total of +15.

By the way, regarding this 4 star, 3 star subject. How do accuscore implement this to their projections. Maybe all his picks were only 4 star projections.

Im going to for sure play the pelicans, as another respected capper on another forum likes that play.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 356
Posted: #103
Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

as of right now i got the celtics/pacers under 186 and the pelicans -6.5 against the cavs. 

Pacers total record 8-3 Celtics total record 9-4

pelicans side record 7-4 cavs side record 9-2


let me know if these qualify. pretty sure they do.


Looks good to me, if Accuscore has correctly predicted the total in Pacers' games  8/11 73% and Celtics games 9/13 69%, combined total 17/24 71%
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 103
Posted: #104
Those are the only 2 plays tonight that i see fellas. The only ones that combined record of accuscore predictions that are above 70% The mavs and jazz total is at 72.5% however accuscore has the total being right at 201 based off of their predicted score and i believe the current total on that game is 201. So I'm assuming thats a no play. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 2509
Posted: #105
Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

fellas i got an accuscore account if someone can just explain to me the rules behind the system i can try to help out and post the same garbage he posted.


I have to say I made money like most on accuscore, I would not mind pitching in cost 49 a month.  any thoughts
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 520
Posted: #106
Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

as of right now i got the celtics/pacers under 186 and the pelicans -6.5 against the cavs. 

Pacers total record 8-3 Celtics total record 9-4

pelicans side record 7-4 cavs side record 9-2


let me know if these qualify. pretty sure they do.

Its not the ATS record, or TOTAL record. Its the record that Accuscore had picked on the team
If Accuscore has pick IND game right 4 time thats 4-1 80% and has picked Boston right 3-1 75%. Combined its 77.5% Accuscore has ben RIGHT. So we use accuser pick this game.
Same fore total.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 27
Posted: #107
Quote Originally Posted by Jparker89:



They do when you calculate the percentages of course, but the records for each side do seem higher than what he would show up. I mean look at the start of this thread, they all totalled less than 10, These picks have a combined total of +15.

By the way, regarding this 4 star, 3 star subject. How do accuscore implement this to their projections. Maybe all his picks were only 4 star projections.

Im going to for sure play the pelicans, as another respected capper on another forum likes that play.

which respected capper is that?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 18
Posted: #108
Quote Originally Posted by relaxguys:


which respected capper is that?


mistermj.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 268
Posted: #109

You can't be mad, he was doing mad work for free, he's not taking anything away from accuscore, he's just using the STATS they provide, you can say he will go cold, but it won't its all based on numbers and numbers don't lie, honestly $200 is one play and your paid up for the yr, that's a steal really, to each his own

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 18
Posted: #110
Quote Originally Posted by Hustlehard23:

You can't be mad, he was doing mad work for free, he's not taking anything away from accuscore, he's just using the STATS they provide, you can say he will go cold, but it won't its all based on numbers and numbers don't lie, honestly $200 is one play and your paid up for the yr, that's a steal really, to each his own

 



Hey Wayne.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 13
Posted: #111
Fiftytwopercent and daytradernation=RESPECT
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 340
Posted: #112
Thanks cmw5123......did you get accuscore direct or through a previous poster comment ESPN. Also you said the total is right on the # I guess it's up to each person how much of a difference do u need to play a total???
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2013
Posts: 712
Posted: #113
Quote Originally Posted by jambo12:

Nothing in Wayne's expalanation about stars:

"
Accuscore simulates each game 10,000 times. Based on the result of the simulates a side is chosen. We are playing the games where accuscore has a record of 70% between both teams. For example:

  • AccuScore ATS Record in CHI games: 3-0, 100%
  • AccuScore ATS Record in TOR games: 3-0, 100%


 Accuscore is 6-0 so far in any game between the bulls and raptors. It does not mean the bulls or raptors have covered in every game. It means accuscore picked the winning side in each game."

Same for Totals, which seemed to work a lot better than ATS



Jambo - I agree with all, and am on the site attempting to replicate it..So after identifying a game where both sides have been predicted at >70% (as in the example you gave above) how would you determine which side of the spread is the correct one? Is it then to go back to their "expert picks" and take the spread they designated?
FYI - if I understand the totals formula correctly the only play tonight would have been SA/MEM under 184
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 210
Posted: #114
Really wish I could see the format of accuscore because I have full understanding on how the selections were being made.  

It is never a matter of the team covering the side but rather accuscore selecting the winner ATS in a teams games.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 356
Posted: #115
Quote Originally Posted by wwtpglobal:

Jambo - I agree with all, and am on the site attempting to replicate it..So after identifying a game where both sides have been predicted at >70% (as in the example you gave above) how would you determine which side of the spread is the correct one? Is it then to go back to their "expert picks" and take the spread they designated?
FYI - if I understand the totals formula correctly the only play tonight would have been SA/MEM under 184

I would assume accuscore give a tip for the game based on their simulations. If they have 70% record on both teams invokved then their tip should hold up.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 103
Posted: #116
Yeah i got that. Its the accuscore record on their predictions of the those teams on either the point spread or the total. Thats the records that i am using. I understand the stars now as well in college football. in order to view the records of accuscores prediction on college football u have to click on the stars of the game. He was using solely the 3 and 4 star picks. Navy is the play tonight for college football.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 18
Posted: #117
Quote Originally Posted by jambo12:


I would assume accuscore give a tip for the game based on their simulations. If they have 70% record on both teams invokved then their tip should hold up.


Yeh that's it
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 18
Posted: #118
Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

Yeah i got that. Its the accuscore record on their predictions of the those teams on either the point spread or the total. Thats the records that i am using. I understand the stars now as well in college football. in order to view the records of accuscores prediction on college football u have to click on the stars of the game. He was using solely the 3 and 4 star picks. Navy is the play tonight for college football.


Thanks for the effort dude.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 18
Posted: #119
Are there any star projections for the nba cmw?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 356
Posted: #120
Quote Originally Posted by Hustlehard23:

You can't be mad, he was doing mad work for free, he's not taking anything away from accuscore, he's just using the STATS they provide, you can say he will go cold, but it won't its all based on numbers and numbers don't lie, honestly $200 is one play and your paid up for the yr, that's a steal really, to each his own

 


200 may be one play but if you never get that play supplied then it is a waste of 200. The guy has already gone back on his word about supplying the tips for free so i would not hold my breath waiting for a response once the 200 has been banked. You will have a gmail address as security if course.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 268
Posted: #121

Quote Originally Posted by Jparker89:



Hey Wayne.

Hi yourself, I've been on here and I make my own picks, you guys are just lazy, why get mad, just don't pay, it makes no difference if a guy goes tout or not, you gotta decide in the info was valuable enough to pay for, if not no skin off your nose. Gotta respect a hustler like it was said before

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 520
Posted: #122
Quote Originally Posted by cmw5123:

Yeah i got that. Its the accuscore record on their predictions of the those teams on either the point spread or the total. Thats the records that i am using. I understand the stars now as well in college football. in order to view the records of accuscores prediction on college football u have to click on the stars of the game. He was using solely the 3 and 4 star picks. Navy is the play tonight for college football.

You might want to try the fade too. When Accuscore has been wrong on a team. 25% or 30%. Just opposite of Being right 75% 80%. Thanks for the effort. Lets see how the picks do. Summarized your analysis it is:

Under BOS/IND
PELICAN
NAVY

Lets see how it works.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 581
Posted: #123
Quote Originally Posted by warcameagle56:

I just tried to buy a subscription to Accuscore and it wouldn't take..


Kind of reminds me of Obamacare................Typical democrat!!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 18
Posted: #124
Quote Originally Posted by Hustlehard23:

Hi yourself, I've been on here and I make my own picks, you guys are just lazy, why get mad, just don't pay, it makes no difference if a guy goes tout or not, you gotta decide in the info was valuable enough to pay for, if not no skin off your nose. Gotta respect a hustler like it was said before



Respect a hustler who goes back on his word? Give me a break.
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 520
Posted: #125
Quote Originally Posted by Hustlehard23:

Hi yourself, I've been on here and I make my own picks, you guys are just lazy, why get mad, just don't pay, it makes no difference if a guy goes tout or not, you gotta decide in the info was valuable enough to pay for, if not no skin off your nose. Gotta respect a hustler like it was said before


How about you stop defending the scammer. Or are you him? LOL dude. Have you seen this happened before? It seems like you are using another username to defend yourself.
All Forums | Website Promotions
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.