rmb5w: Your records/picks for 07/16 is not accurate. Below is a loss that you did not post.
CLEV @ TB: TB'S projected M/L was +124 to M/L was -135 = 59 points (Game Result: TB 2-3 L)
rmb5w: Your records/picks for 07/16 is not accurate. Below is a loss that you did not post.
CLEV @ TB: TB'S projected M/L was +124 to M/L was -135 = 59 points (Game Result: TB 2-3 L)
rmb5w: Your records/picks for 07/16 is not accurate. Below is a loss that you did not post.
CLEV @ TB: TB'S projected M/L was +124 to M/L was -135 = 59 points (Game Result: TB 2-3 L)
rmb5w: Your records/picks for 07/16 is not accurate. Below is a loss that you did not post.
CLEV @ TB: TB'S projected M/L was +124 to M/L was -135 = 59 points (Game Result: TB 2-3 L)
In post #1 you are quoted as saying " I noticed that when only ONE of the two teams had a 40+-point swing".
In post #14 you are quoted as saying "CLE had a -124 to +115 movement as well in that match-up (close to 40 points)".
As we know close only counts in horse shoes and hand granades. I am just asking for accurate records. If you state a "40+ point differential" for ONE team then you have to stick by it. You cant say the other team was "Close to 40 points".
No disrespect but the game I mentioned in post #9 is a loss based on your rules in post #1.
In post #1 you are quoted as saying " I noticed that when only ONE of the two teams had a 40+-point swing".
In post #14 you are quoted as saying "CLE had a -124 to +115 movement as well in that match-up (close to 40 points)".
As we know close only counts in horse shoes and hand granades. I am just asking for accurate records. If you state a "40+ point differential" for ONE team then you have to stick by it. You cant say the other team was "Close to 40 points".
No disrespect but the game I mentioned in post #9 is a loss based on your rules in post #1.
So from what I can tell on the favorites the projected ML goes from higher to lower (actual line) and on the dogs it goes from lower to higher. So the projected moneyline is saying that the dogs are weaker by that many points from the actual line and they are winning. If I'm looking at this right that's pretty strange.
So from what I can tell on the favorites the projected ML goes from higher to lower (actual line) and on the dogs it goes from lower to higher. So the projected moneyline is saying that the dogs are weaker by that many points from the actual line and they are winning. If I'm looking at this right that's pretty strange.
So basically he's projecting the dogs as worse than the actual line (by 40 or more( and they are winning because of that? What a clusterfuck! Nice find I'll prob take all four of those bitches tommorrow! BOL
So basically he's projecting the dogs as worse than the actual line (by 40 or more( and they are winning because of that? What a clusterfuck! Nice find I'll prob take all four of those bitches tommorrow! BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.