Yes guys and gals. Playing everyone is a way to manage your stack BUT I personally would not encourage anyone to keep upping their stack after a loss, although, I have a 4 run double system + a parlay system using his plays and picking the side on the total if I have a real feel for the matchup.....this works for me quite well and if you went into my own thread, I almost exclusively deal with only strong OVER or UNDER teams and nothing else until data results change through the season and I track it In this Canisius matchup, I played small on the OVER but bigger on the point spread and moneyline in combos .... But imagine if you followed Falcon religiously, a loss would not matter because, you would be up over $2000 profit and its no issue Some of the moaning and groaning on the occasional game is EXACTLY how not to play with a system and the stock market also
You lost me at parlay system. Why ever play a parlay as you are giving up possible profit.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst:
Yes guys and gals. Playing everyone is a way to manage your stack BUT I personally would not encourage anyone to keep upping their stack after a loss, although, I have a 4 run double system + a parlay system using his plays and picking the side on the total if I have a real feel for the matchup.....this works for me quite well and if you went into my own thread, I almost exclusively deal with only strong OVER or UNDER teams and nothing else until data results change through the season and I track it In this Canisius matchup, I played small on the OVER but bigger on the point spread and moneyline in combos .... But imagine if you followed Falcon religiously, a loss would not matter because, you would be up over $2000 profit and its no issue Some of the moaning and groaning on the occasional game is EXACTLY how not to play with a system and the stock market also
You lost me at parlay system. Why ever play a parlay as you are giving up possible profit.
Definitely not mad about the pick, who knows it may still come in and the season is a marathon not a sprint. MITM is a blessing. I think most bettors just like watching good basketball if they have a little action on it and this St. Peters squad is just horribly coached on the offensive end. Played on pick up teams that could run this team out of the gym.
1
@Last2thirst
Definitely not mad about the pick, who knows it may still come in and the season is a marathon not a sprint. MITM is a blessing. I think most bettors just like watching good basketball if they have a little action on it and this St. Peters squad is just horribly coached on the offensive end. Played on pick up teams that could run this team out of the gym.
Yes guys and gals. Playing everyone is a way to manage your stack BUT I personally would not encourage anyone to keep upping their stack after a loss, although, I have a 4 run double system + a parlay system using his plays and picking the side on the total if I have a real feel for the matchup.....this works for me quite well and if you went into my own thread, I almost exclusively deal with only strong OVER or UNDER teams and nothing else until data results change through the season and I track it In this Canisius matchup, I played small on the OVER but bigger on the point spread and moneyline in combos .... But imagine if you followed Falcon religiously, a loss would not matter because, you would be up over $2000 profit and its no issue Some of the moaning and groaning on the occasional game is EXACTLY how not to play with a system and the stock market also
What Falcon does is play 5% of the bankroll adjusted after each game. Impossible to go broke with this type of play but risking 5% of the bankroll is a little rich for some of the veterans in the game that know streaks come and go.
Great luck to you and your plays.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst:
Yes guys and gals. Playing everyone is a way to manage your stack BUT I personally would not encourage anyone to keep upping their stack after a loss, although, I have a 4 run double system + a parlay system using his plays and picking the side on the total if I have a real feel for the matchup.....this works for me quite well and if you went into my own thread, I almost exclusively deal with only strong OVER or UNDER teams and nothing else until data results change through the season and I track it In this Canisius matchup, I played small on the OVER but bigger on the point spread and moneyline in combos .... But imagine if you followed Falcon religiously, a loss would not matter because, you would be up over $2000 profit and its no issue Some of the moaning and groaning on the occasional game is EXACTLY how not to play with a system and the stock market also
What Falcon does is play 5% of the bankroll adjusted after each game. Impossible to go broke with this type of play but risking 5% of the bankroll is a little rich for some of the veterans in the game that know streaks come and go.
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst: Yes guys and gals. Playing everyone is a way to manage your stack BUT I personally would not encourage anyone to keep upping their stack after a loss, although, I have a 4 run double system + a parlay system using his plays and picking the side on the total if I have a real feel for the matchup.....this works for me quite well and if you went into my own thread, I almost exclusively deal with only strong OVER or UNDER teams and nothing else until data results change through the season and I track it In this Canisius matchup, I played small on the OVER but bigger on the point spread and moneyline in combos .... But imagine if you followed Falcon religiously, a loss would not matter because, you would be up over $2000 profit and its no issue Some of the moaning and groaning on the occasional game is EXACTLY how not to play with a system and the stock market also You lost me at parlay system. Why ever play a parlay as you are giving up possible profit.
Not going to elaborate because, the thread is about Falcon's system.
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
1
Quote Originally Posted by witswits:
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst: Yes guys and gals. Playing everyone is a way to manage your stack BUT I personally would not encourage anyone to keep upping their stack after a loss, although, I have a 4 run double system + a parlay system using his plays and picking the side on the total if I have a real feel for the matchup.....this works for me quite well and if you went into my own thread, I almost exclusively deal with only strong OVER or UNDER teams and nothing else until data results change through the season and I track it In this Canisius matchup, I played small on the OVER but bigger on the point spread and moneyline in combos .... But imagine if you followed Falcon religiously, a loss would not matter because, you would be up over $2000 profit and its no issue Some of the moaning and groaning on the occasional game is EXACTLY how not to play with a system and the stock market also You lost me at parlay system. Why ever play a parlay as you are giving up possible profit.
Not going to elaborate because, the thread is about Falcon's system.
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst: Yes guys and gals. Playing everyone is a way to manage your stack BUT I personally would not encourage anyone to keep upping their stack after a loss, although, I have a 4 run double system + a parlay system using his plays and picking the side on the total if I have a real feel for the matchup.....this works for me quite well and if you went into my own thread, I almost exclusively deal with only strong OVER or UNDER teams and nothing else until data results change through the season and I track it In this Canisius matchup, I played small on the OVER but bigger on the point spread and moneyline in combos .... But imagine if you followed Falcon religiously, a loss would not matter because, you would be up over $2000 profit and its no issue Some of the moaning and groaning on the occasional game is EXACTLY how not to play with a system and the stock market also What Falcon does is play 5% of the bankroll adjusted after each game. Impossible to go broke with this type of play but risking 5% of the bankroll is a little rich for some of the veterans in the game that know streaks come and go. Great luck to you and your plays.
Completely agree about how Falcon is doing it which is quite attractive of an education on how to bet....and which is why I made some decent money in NCAAF this year doing something similar by managing the number of plays I made and just focusing on 2-3 per week most of the time for my own money management system
Good post double - Wits!
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
1
Quote Originally Posted by witswits:
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst: Yes guys and gals. Playing everyone is a way to manage your stack BUT I personally would not encourage anyone to keep upping their stack after a loss, although, I have a 4 run double system + a parlay system using his plays and picking the side on the total if I have a real feel for the matchup.....this works for me quite well and if you went into my own thread, I almost exclusively deal with only strong OVER or UNDER teams and nothing else until data results change through the season and I track it In this Canisius matchup, I played small on the OVER but bigger on the point spread and moneyline in combos .... But imagine if you followed Falcon religiously, a loss would not matter because, you would be up over $2000 profit and its no issue Some of the moaning and groaning on the occasional game is EXACTLY how not to play with a system and the stock market also What Falcon does is play 5% of the bankroll adjusted after each game. Impossible to go broke with this type of play but risking 5% of the bankroll is a little rich for some of the veterans in the game that know streaks come and go. Great luck to you and your plays.
Completely agree about how Falcon is doing it which is quite attractive of an education on how to bet....and which is why I made some decent money in NCAAF this year doing something similar by managing the number of plays I made and just focusing on 2-3 per week most of the time for my own money management system
Hey MITM, I thought you were wagering 5% of your bankroll adjusted for each wager. It looks to me that the Philly over play is 10% of the bankroll. Did I miss something?? TIA if you do read the comments.
0
@MITM
Hey MITM, I thought you were wagering 5% of your bankroll adjusted for each wager. It looks to me that the Philly over play is 10% of the bankroll. Did I miss something?? TIA if you do read the comments.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.