SlowCurve, I don't see how those numbers could even be close. See post#79...a game 7 wager of 426,000 (allegedly) on the Dodgers that won. If that (alleged) wager were a loss, you would have had to double that amount for game 8 (depending on the price). This would have your bankroll on the hook to the tune of around 1.7mil should that game 8 not go your way! In this case however, game seven went the way of the poster and all (alleged) losses were recovered (tho the figures as posted don't really add up). Anywhoo, that scary game 7 scenario required over 600K of bankroll (approx. 1220units). So, to put it into perspective, if you were a $1-bettor, you would have needed about $1,220 (all of which would've been at risk) to gain $1 on the Dodgers using this system. Before the faithful in this thread turn the torch my way, be aware that I am NOT out to bash the poster, or the system here...I am merely putting this chase system into perspective while trying to answer the often-ignored question of "how much bank roll is required for THIS system?" In all fairness it should be observed that this system has not suffered a loss, and is in positive territory. A $1-dollar bettor would be up about $160, an approximate 13 percent gain on bankroll...which, imo is commendable. Hope this helps...GL to all
SlowCurve, I don't see how those numbers could even be close. See post#79...a game 7 wager of 426,000 (allegedly) on the Dodgers that won. If that (alleged) wager were a loss, you would have had to double that amount for game 8 (depending on the price). This would have your bankroll on the hook to the tune of around 1.7mil should that game 8 not go your way! In this case however, game seven went the way of the poster and all (alleged) losses were recovered (tho the figures as posted don't really add up). Anywhoo, that scary game 7 scenario required over 600K of bankroll (approx. 1220units). So, to put it into perspective, if you were a $1-bettor, you would have needed about $1,220 (all of which would've been at risk) to gain $1 on the Dodgers using this system. Before the faithful in this thread turn the torch my way, be aware that I am NOT out to bash the poster, or the system here...I am merely putting this chase system into perspective while trying to answer the often-ignored question of "how much bank roll is required for THIS system?" In all fairness it should be observed that this system has not suffered a loss, and is in positive territory. A $1-dollar bettor would be up about $160, an approximate 13 percent gain on bankroll...which, imo is commendable. Hope this helps...GL to all
SlowCurve, I don't see how those numbers could even be close. See post#79...a game 7 wager of 426,000 (allegedly) on the Dodgers that won. If that (alleged) wager were a loss, you would have had to double that amount for game 8 (depending on the price). This would have your bankroll on the hook to the tune of around 1.7mil should that game 8 not go your way! In this case however, game seven went the way of the poster and all (alleged) losses were recovered (tho the figures as posted don't really add up). Anywhoo, that scary game 7 scenario required over 600K of bankroll (approx. 1220units). So, to put it into perspective, if you were a $1-bettor, you would have needed about $1,220 (all of which would've been at risk) to gain $1 on the Dodgers using this system. Before the faithful in this thread turn the torch my way, be aware that I am NOT out to bash the poster, or the system here...I am merely putting this chase system into perspective while trying to answer the often-ignored question of "how much bank roll is required for THIS system?" In all fairness it should be observed that this system has not suffered a loss, and is in positive territory. A $1-dollar bettor would be up about $160, an approximate 13 percent gain on bankroll...which, imo is commendable. Hope this helps...GL to all
SlowCurve, I don't see how those numbers could even be close. See post#79...a game 7 wager of 426,000 (allegedly) on the Dodgers that won. If that (alleged) wager were a loss, you would have had to double that amount for game 8 (depending on the price). This would have your bankroll on the hook to the tune of around 1.7mil should that game 8 not go your way! In this case however, game seven went the way of the poster and all (alleged) losses were recovered (tho the figures as posted don't really add up). Anywhoo, that scary game 7 scenario required over 600K of bankroll (approx. 1220units). So, to put it into perspective, if you were a $1-bettor, you would have needed about $1,220 (all of which would've been at risk) to gain $1 on the Dodgers using this system. Before the faithful in this thread turn the torch my way, be aware that I am NOT out to bash the poster, or the system here...I am merely putting this chase system into perspective while trying to answer the often-ignored question of "how much bank roll is required for THIS system?" In all fairness it should be observed that this system has not suffered a loss, and is in positive territory. A $1-dollar bettor would be up about $160, an approximate 13 percent gain on bankroll...which, imo is commendable. Hope this helps...GL to all
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.