HUGE PLAY FOR THURSDAY

Since Vanzack is on the attack, let's take a moment and turn the spotlight on him.

Let's compare his unit total to mine on an apples-to-apples basis.

By his math he is +16.2 units on the season.

But keep in mind he doesn't "flat bet".

He typically bets between 1-4 units, with 2.5 units being the average.

Therefore, his 16.2 units gained is based on an average bet amount of 2.5 units, which is 2.5 times the 1 unit I have assumed in my 12.8 unit worst case scenario.

This means that in order to accurately compare results one must reduce his units to reflect a 1 unit flat.

By doing this his actual unit total is +6.8 units which is significantly less than mine.

There's a reason why he doesn't track wins-losses and it's because he's probably average at best.

Regardless, since he thinks "records don't matter", only profit, then it's important that people know how to accurately compare the two.

And since he claims he knows "numbers", this is math he should not only understand but agree that it is the only true comparison.

So, which is better?

60% win rate with a profit of 12.8 units or an "average" win rate with a profit of 6.8 units?

It's not rocket science, right "assman"?

Ok , then you and Vanzak tell us what are his true intentions . Please explain us , illuminate us with the truth instead making this a long novel .

If he buys picks and gaves em for free here who cares . If he buys points who cares . Now you 2 covers police officers please explain to us what do you know that the rest of us dont or , at least report it ALL to the covers mods and stop this thing that really makes you 2 guys look really bad .

Funny, I never compared myself to you.  I dont care who is better.  You get the crown - KING OF PICKS IS SPORTSTUITION!

I care that you are a tout, and are avoiding the issue.

Stop making strawmans and address the issue.

There is a website with the same picks as you.  You have solicited posters to work for that website. One of the following is true:
A.  You are a client and posting their picks
B.  They are stealing your picks from Covers
C.  You and the website are the same

Wow.  Now I get it.  Your alias is Dubz4dummys.  Has to be.

You think every wager is 1 unit because you say so?  You say my average wager is 2.5 when it clearly is 2.01?  117 / 58 = 2.01

You are sloppy.  And dumb.  And eerily similar down to the writing style of the other idiot spouting the same exact nonsense in another thread.

I am reposting this for you here.  I dont care if you are better.  I NEVER said my record was better.  I could easily end the season losing.

THE POINT IS YOU ARE DISINGENUOUS.  

Record W/L:                 34-24
Total Units Risked:        117.0
Units W/L:                    69 W, 48 L
Profit:                            21.0

Record %:                     58.6% 
Units %:                        58.9%

And it is actually really easy to compare.

You are 74 / 61.2 = 54.7% with vig included
I am  69 / 52.8 = 56.6% with vig included

WHO CARES???

There is a website with the same picks as you.  You have solicited posters to work for that website. One of the following is true:
A.  You are a client and posting their picks
B.  They are stealing your picks from Covers
C.  You and the website are the same

So now you didn't compare yourself to me after boasting about your "units" while trying to discredit everything I was doing?

I already assumed that you would quickly backpedal after seeing the apples-to-apples comparison and the truth of your performance when compared to mine.

At least you confirmed for me that you do understand "numbers".

As for your question, I have answered the question more than once.

It's simple.

I am NOT a service or affiliated with one.

In fact, I even stated more than once that I hate touts.

One day your buddy Darren and his countless alias' will need to accept it wasn't coincidence that he was banned almost immediately after our exchange.

I know he "knows" there's a connection.

And this is what really pissed him off and created his current mission.

And at that same moment you will understand that you piled on to something that led to a dead end, all because you apparently have a hard-on for touts.

Why don't all of you just STFU 

OK dope.  I have decided that I have had enough debating with morons for one day.

Keep going with your math, and your theories, that -120 is somehow an insurance policy for experienced investors, your alias, and the sheer coincidence that a tout website exists with your same picks.

Funny how a guy that was banned thinks he's now the "covers police", a bad one too.

If I'm covers I'm laughing at him while banning his daily new alias'.

typical covers... guy is winning close to 60% over long clip and they are trying to be detective 101 .  STFU and let him post the plays!

The fact that he buys every game to 20cents should tell you he’s a fake.

Every game is double digit winner…I can go on and on.  He’s trash.  

He doesn’t have a nickel bet on any of these games

@NR114

@SportsIntuition

Keep avoiding the truth. The DM's don't lie. It's clearly black and white what you sent and what you are up to.

Just a matter of time 

@vanzack

 100%

@SportsIntuition

 If your wagers are 1 unit why do you call them HUGE? What does this mean?

for anyone who have not been around sport betting forums too long it all means I have those tout service dreams!!! 

they come on here and use certain phrases and words, throw some picks out for a bit and hope for a good run to gain their followers. If it don’t work no biggie. Just change my name and try again.

I promise you this is the truth about this fella

Huge play 

The real winners that are actually worthy of having their picks paid such as a guy like Vanzack give you all the experience and info in the world and would actually never ask you for a dime

@SportsIntuition

It is obvious Vanzack has done his research and you did not answer his question and it is important. You post plays and they are identical to the website that he is referencing. That site has a feature of listing previous picks and prides itself on keeping an open record. The plays are identical, the record is identical. 

So it is either that you are a service and that is what he and the other member are alluding to, OR you are taking plays from there as paid and posting on here. Their terms of service are from the site that you cannot post their plays elsewhere, it is in their Q&A section. So given that you are either part of the service or are posting service plays from there we cant have you posting in the main forums. We do not allow service plays in the main area, so I will move your threads to our website promotions area and you can post from there going forward.

The plays and stats are identical, that cannot be refuted and given that fact its either you are the service or are posting their plays, neither is what we allow.

I believe they call that a mic drop.

@wallstreetcappers

Thank you.

Side note, he has a "HUGE PLAY FOR THURSDAY" in NBA forum that should also be moved to website promotions.

Hilarious

All this tout talk has gotten me super horny 

I DID answer his question, candidly!

I am NOT a service or a tout, nor am I affiliated with one!

I also openly stated that I DO subscribe to a few newsletters but that doesn't make me a tout or service

I'm a researcher and there a few football newsletters that I subscribe to and occasionally find "gold nuggets" in.

But subscribing to a newsletter doesn't make me a tout service or create an affiliation to them.

Because my picks are similar to someone else's doesn't confirm anything either.

And even if they were exact it doesn't mean anything or break any Covers rules. 

Bottom line, I post picks, interact with people respectfully and never once posted any 3rd party links, names or broke any covers rules.

Good luck with your forum!

@vanzack

 Who the F cares? Bro you have your own thread, go suck on something

 GL SI