I played pitts today. I messed up and forgot about the hat.. I should of just stayed off this game if it is in conflict with what I am smelling but then again, I'm still in the red with my bankroll and my mickey mouse system. ha
Tomorrow though, I'm riding the hat, either A or B no matter but I'm on it. Good guys
Lucky winner for me at -122 and good job you guys who rides the hat..
The system is powerful enough that I will never bet against the hat. Either play the hat or no play for me. Glad Pitts came back large at the back end for me... phew...
onto the next one... you betcha I'm In..
X_____________________________
0
Quote Originally Posted by nfl_brosuf:
I played pitts today. I messed up and forgot about the hat.. I should of just stayed off this game if it is in conflict with what I am smelling but then again, I'm still in the red with my bankroll and my mickey mouse system. ha
Tomorrow though, I'm riding the hat, either A or B no matter but I'm on it. Good guys
Lucky winner for me at -122 and good job you guys who rides the hat..
The system is powerful enough that I will never bet against the hat. Either play the hat or no play for me. Glad Pitts came back large at the back end for me... phew...
I am intrigued by this system, I've been trying to develop a chase system of my own but if this one is proven I see no reason not to follow it, only problem is I use an actual bookie where wagers are between 25-200(probably because of this system lol), where do all of you bet and are able to risk 40+ units if comes down to. 5th game and do they always pay out? Finally what are the odds of losing with the system because I plan to follow and join the merriment:)
0
I am intrigued by this system, I've been trying to develop a chase system of my own but if this one is proven I see no reason not to follow it, only problem is I use an actual bookie where wagers are between 25-200(probably because of this system lol), where do all of you bet and are able to risk 40+ units if comes down to. 5th game and do they always pay out? Finally what are the odds of losing with the system because I plan to follow and join the merriment:)
If you think this is absurd, the NHL would drop you!
NHL system same exact premise 128-0 and 94% on the A & B with only 1 (D) play!
How is this possible??? It can't be A coincidence that The first matchup listed happens to cover the RL or PL every time. I'm dumbfounded. The system works but why? I guess it doesn't matter. Nice Job finding this. I hopped on board with Cincy and the Cubs last two days. 2-2 so far. Crazy
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:
If you think this is absurd, the NHL would drop you!
NHL system same exact premise 128-0 and 94% on the A & B with only 1 (D) play!
How is this possible??? It can't be A coincidence that The first matchup listed happens to cover the RL or PL every time. I'm dumbfounded. The system works but why? I guess it doesn't matter. Nice Job finding this. I hopped on board with Cincy and the Cubs last two days. 2-2 so far. Crazy
Nevermind on my previous post about a bookkeeping site that allows higher bets to afford. 40+ because it's simply ridiculous to think one would ever be betting that much by falling for the gamblers fallacy and feeling safe and cozy with the small gains when one loss wipes out all gains and more. People have had this scheme forever and chase betting I admit won me my first few pay days and switching to a constant bet a have flailed like a fish out of water. I AM NOT SAYING HAT IS NOT SMART JUST THAT THE SYSTEM IS DOOMED TO FAIL LIKE ALL CHASE BETTING TO THIS EXTREME. Hat said it himself the first two bets win 84% of the time well I'll say a single chase of -150 with 100 bets would win you 84 units but the 16 losses of A will cost you 24 and 16 of B will be 3.75x16=60 and 60+24= holy crap lol I didn't even do the math before right now it's exactly 84 you would break even haha but no you want to go past that to c d and e and I welcome you to but remember each bet is independent unless someone wants to explain to me how this rotation makes the variables dependent? It appears to me my friends(which I truly believe we are as I an enlightening you and am a fellow bettor looking to win consistently for yeRs to come) that me hat is not clever or even lucky but instead is either in ignorant bliss of this fact or has balls of steel and is NOT unlucky like all the others who say a system works because they haven't lost YET. On a final note kudos to winning so many picks straight why not stay conventional. Wiki taleb distribution
0
Nevermind on my previous post about a bookkeeping site that allows higher bets to afford. 40+ because it's simply ridiculous to think one would ever be betting that much by falling for the gamblers fallacy and feeling safe and cozy with the small gains when one loss wipes out all gains and more. People have had this scheme forever and chase betting I admit won me my first few pay days and switching to a constant bet a have flailed like a fish out of water. I AM NOT SAYING HAT IS NOT SMART JUST THAT THE SYSTEM IS DOOMED TO FAIL LIKE ALL CHASE BETTING TO THIS EXTREME. Hat said it himself the first two bets win 84% of the time well I'll say a single chase of -150 with 100 bets would win you 84 units but the 16 losses of A will cost you 24 and 16 of B will be 3.75x16=60 and 60+24= holy crap lol I didn't even do the math before right now it's exactly 84 you would break even haha but no you want to go past that to c d and e and I welcome you to but remember each bet is independent unless someone wants to explain to me how this rotation makes the variables dependent? It appears to me my friends(which I truly believe we are as I an enlightening you and am a fellow bettor looking to win consistently for yeRs to come) that me hat is not clever or even lucky but instead is either in ignorant bliss of this fact or has balls of steel and is NOT unlucky like all the others who say a system works because they haven't lost YET. On a final note kudos to winning so many picks straight why not stay conventional. Wiki taleb distribution
I'm not even gonna do the math for nhl but 94 percent nhl hmmm why does it seem like the same results I delineated with mlb run line would result in the same exact scenario... OH THATS RIGHT. Cuz it would, we all know puck line dogs are more expensive than run lines. It's All the same you have small gains and pray for no catastrophic loss of 5 straight losses which will come
0
I'm not even gonna do the math for nhl but 94 percent nhl hmmm why does it seem like the same results I delineated with mlb run line would result in the same exact scenario... OH THATS RIGHT. Cuz it would, we all know puck line dogs are more expensive than run lines. It's All the same you have small gains and pray for no catastrophic loss of 5 straight losses which will come
Nevermind on my previous post about a bookkeeping site that allows higher bets to afford. 40+ because it's simply ridiculous to think one would ever be betting that much by falling for the gamblers fallacy and feeling safe and cozy with the small gains when one loss wipes out all gains and more. People have had this scheme forever and chase betting I admit won me my first few pay days and switching to a constant bet a have flailed like a fish out of water. I AM NOT SAYING HAT IS NOT SMART JUST THAT THE SYSTEM IS DOOMED TO FAIL LIKE ALL CHASE BETTING TO THIS EXTREME. Hat said it himself the first two bets win 84% of the time well I'll say a single chase of -150 with 100 bets would win you 84 units but the 16 losses of A will cost you 24 and 16 of B will be 3.75x16=60 and 60+24= holy crap lol I didn't even do the math before right now it's exactly 84 you would break even haha but no you want to go past that to c d and e and I welcome you to but remember each bet is independent unless someone wants to explain to me how this rotation makes the variables dependent? It appears to me my friends(which I truly believe we are as I an enlightening you and am a fellow bettor looking to win consistently for yeRs to come) that me hat is not clever or even lucky but instead is either in ignorant bliss of this fact or has balls of steel and is NOT unlucky like all the others who say a system works because they haven't lost YET. On a final note kudos to winning so many picks straight why not stay conventional. Wiki taleb distribution
Good luck with your betting style. I'm having no problem with mine. My other system starting May 2 can withstand 5 losses and still break even. I know that will never happen in one season since its never lost in 5, maybe longer. One day I'll back check another 5.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Easyfeller:
Nevermind on my previous post about a bookkeeping site that allows higher bets to afford. 40+ because it's simply ridiculous to think one would ever be betting that much by falling for the gamblers fallacy and feeling safe and cozy with the small gains when one loss wipes out all gains and more. People have had this scheme forever and chase betting I admit won me my first few pay days and switching to a constant bet a have flailed like a fish out of water. I AM NOT SAYING HAT IS NOT SMART JUST THAT THE SYSTEM IS DOOMED TO FAIL LIKE ALL CHASE BETTING TO THIS EXTREME. Hat said it himself the first two bets win 84% of the time well I'll say a single chase of -150 with 100 bets would win you 84 units but the 16 losses of A will cost you 24 and 16 of B will be 3.75x16=60 and 60+24= holy crap lol I didn't even do the math before right now it's exactly 84 you would break even haha but no you want to go past that to c d and e and I welcome you to but remember each bet is independent unless someone wants to explain to me how this rotation makes the variables dependent? It appears to me my friends(which I truly believe we are as I an enlightening you and am a fellow bettor looking to win consistently for yeRs to come) that me hat is not clever or even lucky but instead is either in ignorant bliss of this fact or has balls of steel and is NOT unlucky like all the others who say a system works because they haven't lost YET. On a final note kudos to winning so many picks straight why not stay conventional. Wiki taleb distribution
Good luck with your betting style. I'm having no problem with mine. My other system starting May 2 can withstand 5 losses and still break even. I know that will never happen in one season since its never lost in 5, maybe longer. One day I'll back check another 5.
Ugh noob why so you people not just think for yourself, two options either in fantasy land where there is a perfect system and hat has it or you are too scared to pick 5 straight favorites and your own in which case you follow a nonsensical order of picks. Here are the numbers for you it's just like March madness, hat picks 5 favorites(yes -150 means favorite as far as run line goes) from what I've read on stats favorites win 62 percent of the time so like ncaabb you multiply the probability of losing 5 times .38^5=.07% so hats system works 149 out of 150 times... Be a man and pick 5 straight favorites on your own and stop sucking hats wash pole( if you don't believe me write down a favorite every day you want and see if you ever lose 5 in a row) no offense I will say again to mr hat unless he knows this and made up the system drunk one day like L Ron Hubbard saying I can make people worship me by inventing a religion, and his friends were like no way shut up Hubbard but he did and people like tom cruise still do, and hat knows this he had to unless he and you believe in magic and a flawless system.ITS CALLED PROBABILITY PEOPLE TAKE YOUR OWN CHANCES DONT WORSHIP SCIENTOLOGY
0
Ugh noob why so you people not just think for yourself, two options either in fantasy land where there is a perfect system and hat has it or you are too scared to pick 5 straight favorites and your own in which case you follow a nonsensical order of picks. Here are the numbers for you it's just like March madness, hat picks 5 favorites(yes -150 means favorite as far as run line goes) from what I've read on stats favorites win 62 percent of the time so like ncaabb you multiply the probability of losing 5 times .38^5=.07% so hats system works 149 out of 150 times... Be a man and pick 5 straight favorites on your own and stop sucking hats wash pole( if you don't believe me write down a favorite every day you want and see if you ever lose 5 in a row) no offense I will say again to mr hat unless he knows this and made up the system drunk one day like L Ron Hubbard saying I can make people worship me by inventing a religion, and his friends were like no way shut up Hubbard but he did and people like tom cruise still do, and hat knows this he had to unless he and you believe in magic and a flawless system.ITS CALLED PROBABILITY PEOPLE TAKE YOUR OWN CHANCES DONT WORSHIP SCIENTOLOGY
Well duh me hat like I said before your system works 149 out of 150 times roughly you just haven't been unlucky yet I see you hit D as E before you are one bet away from losing a lot and e deciding hmmm should I go one more and pick F? And you may win that but if you don't which probability dictates you will if you bet enough you will lose all you have gained, but if your clever like I assume you are you will stop at E and start over absorbing the loss cuz you've already made enough that one total lose of 5 straight won't hurt you because you are not unlucky, but if you go to F you could lose it all
0
Well duh me hat like I said before your system works 149 out of 150 times roughly you just haven't been unlucky yet I see you hit D as E before you are one bet away from losing a lot and e deciding hmmm should I go one more and pick F? And you may win that but if you don't which probability dictates you will if you bet enough you will lose all you have gained, but if your clever like I assume you are you will stop at E and start over absorbing the loss cuz you've already made enough that one total lose of 5 straight won't hurt you because you are not unlucky, but if you go to F you could lose it all
And for the record chase bettin is my style I just accept the fact it is flawed when it comes to a random voice like you do and hope my string of picks are connected and have a statistical grounding not just random like you, please tell me you are too proud to admit it cuz is rather think you are a clever trickster who has gathered a group of followers knowing your system is just the same as the others who chase bet than a man who truly believes he is omnipotent
0
And for the record chase bettin is my style I just accept the fact it is flawed when it comes to a random voice like you do and hope my string of picks are connected and have a statistical grounding not just random like you, please tell me you are too proud to admit it cuz is rather think you are a clever trickster who has gathered a group of followers knowing your system is just the same as the others who chase bet than a man who truly believes he is omnipotent
And for the record chase bettin is my style I just accept the fact it is flawed when it comes to a random voice like you do and hope my string of picks are connected and have a statistical grounding not just random like you, please tell me you are too proud to admit it cuz is rather think you are a clever trickster who has gathered a group of followers knowing your system is just the same as the others who chase bet than a man who truly believes he is omnipotent
Most of my systems are based on very real parameters those I never disclose because they get stolen. This is just a very strange phenomenon that has worked for at least past 5 years accept or not I don't care. I'm making boatloads of money!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Easyfeller:
And for the record chase bettin is my style I just accept the fact it is flawed when it comes to a random voice like you do and hope my string of picks are connected and have a statistical grounding not just random like you, please tell me you are too proud to admit it cuz is rather think you are a clever trickster who has gathered a group of followers knowing your system is just the same as the others who chase bet than a man who truly believes he is omnipotent
Most of my systems are based on very real parameters those I never disclose because they get stolen. This is just a very strange phenomenon that has worked for at least past 5 years accept or not I don't care. I'm making boatloads of money!
You know what me hat I accept your challenge I'll post my bets starting with tomorrow. I'll give you a sure thing orioles alternate run line +1.5 lol but seriously
0
You know what me hat I accept your challenge I'll post my bets starting with tomorrow. I'll give you a sure thing orioles alternate run line +1.5 lol but seriously
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
guys
..slowbathia
Hot Forum Topics
