Most are posted but some were not. Just out and about and hard to make bet and post sometimes. But it may help you guys out more ...and if you don't believe it well that is ok as well. And I like looking at it when it is good lol.
76-67 (31-16 MAX PLAYS) +88.75 units (+$8875)
DAL-CON-1.5 158.5 First glance I would take DAL and the over here. CON is worse now without Jones than people think and still DAL not getting enough credit. Has CON won without Jones yet? No. Also DAL pace of play I think we speed this game up much like CHI did w CON. Leaning DAL and the Over.
CHI-4.5-NYL 166 Why so much love on CHI now? I know Parker is back and they have won 5 straight but 4 of those were IND and a depleted CON squad. Sabrina is back. At NY. Leaning NYL here and loving the Over.
WSH-SEA-15 162. Hmm tough spread one. TC went off again last game but missing Hines-Allen. In SEA. Tough one to call. Instinct says WSH covers this. TC is just too good. Plaisance now that she is playing is pretty damn good. WSH will get most of the boards here. I don't see -15. Also really liking this 1Q over again.
Brutal Popping Dollies in Da Big Apple!!
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Was busy last few days but played.
Thinking I am putting up my WHOLE record.
Most are posted but some were not. Just out and about and hard to make bet and post sometimes. But it may help you guys out more ...and if you don't believe it well that is ok as well. And I like looking at it when it is good lol.
76-67 (31-16 MAX PLAYS) +88.75 units (+$8875)
DAL-CON-1.5 158.5 First glance I would take DAL and the over here. CON is worse now without Jones than people think and still DAL not getting enough credit. Has CON won without Jones yet? No. Also DAL pace of play I think we speed this game up much like CHI did w CON. Leaning DAL and the Over.
CHI-4.5-NYL 166 Why so much love on CHI now? I know Parker is back and they have won 5 straight but 4 of those were IND and a depleted CON squad. Sabrina is back. At NY. Leaning NYL here and loving the Over.
WSH-SEA-15 162. Hmm tough spread one. TC went off again last game but missing Hines-Allen. In SEA. Tough one to call. Instinct says WSH covers this. TC is just too good. Plaisance now that she is playing is pretty damn good. WSH will get most of the boards here. I don't see -15. Also really liking this 1Q over again.
I'm with you on dallas and WSH, Joe. Even with MHA out (and Cloud), they still have TC31, who is prob the MVP, Ariel Atkins, and Plaisance like you said is doing well. Seattle was -15ish vs the Fever, so know were are saying that WSH and the Fever are equal teams? Had to take Wash here. Also, took Wings +1.5. I think they are straight up a better team when JJ is out. Unless D Bonner goes off, Dallas should win. Kinda like the OVER too. Line keeps dropping, will prob wait it out and hopefully hit the bottom! Good luck!
0
I'm with you on dallas and WSH, Joe. Even with MHA out (and Cloud), they still have TC31, who is prob the MVP, Ariel Atkins, and Plaisance like you said is doing well. Seattle was -15ish vs the Fever, so know were are saying that WSH and the Fever are equal teams? Had to take Wash here. Also, took Wings +1.5. I think they are straight up a better team when JJ is out. Unless D Bonner goes off, Dallas should win. Kinda like the OVER too. Line keeps dropping, will prob wait it out and hopefully hit the bottom! Good luck!
I too would like to hit that over now but the more I think about this the more we got a chance for CON to make it ugly... and the steam is going against us right now. CON is a team to even make a DAL or a SEA go ugly I feel. No a great 3 point team without Jones. Just my instinct.
The CHI-NYL game. You have two very similar teams. Except CHI has CP. She is good but plays much like a guard. So does Dolson. Everyone on that team plays like a guard and Copper I believe is leading that team in rebounds. A 6 foot guard! I may be wrong here but I believe I am right. So u got Sabrina (and R Allen and Whitcomb) getting the boards for lol. You got no Bigs for both teams really ...that actually play like Bigs!! So who is going to shoot it better from three? Who is going to turn it over more? My money says 3's a toss-up maybe a bit more to CHI . TO to CHI. They LOVE to turn it over. NYL tenacious D and a nice coach who gets max effort. Give me 6 points at home and i will take my chances. If NYL misses threes I lose this.
Also it is risky to take a MAX PLAY on a 1Q bet for obvious reasons but I really like this WSH-SEA one to go over. Both teams push it and SEA is really good 1Q...usually
brutal
0
Thanks Casey for the input.
Couple more thoughts.
I too would like to hit that over now but the more I think about this the more we got a chance for CON to make it ugly... and the steam is going against us right now. CON is a team to even make a DAL or a SEA go ugly I feel. No a great 3 point team without Jones. Just my instinct.
The CHI-NYL game. You have two very similar teams. Except CHI has CP. She is good but plays much like a guard. So does Dolson. Everyone on that team plays like a guard and Copper I believe is leading that team in rebounds. A 6 foot guard! I may be wrong here but I believe I am right. So u got Sabrina (and R Allen and Whitcomb) getting the boards for lol. You got no Bigs for both teams really ...that actually play like Bigs!! So who is going to shoot it better from three? Who is going to turn it over more? My money says 3's a toss-up maybe a bit more to CHI . TO to CHI. They LOVE to turn it over. NYL tenacious D and a nice coach who gets max effort. Give me 6 points at home and i will take my chances. If NYL misses threes I lose this.
Also it is risky to take a MAX PLAY on a 1Q bet for obvious reasons but I really like this WSH-SEA one to go over. Both teams push it and SEA is really good 1Q...usually
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.