HIT that DOUBLE MAX but only counting it as one in record but two on MAX PLAYS. so 127-110 (49-31)-61% MAX PLAYS. Really thought that DAL-CHI over tilt would be easy though. Thought that DOUBLE MAX 2H would be easy as well and I sweated that one out. Money MGT guys. And I am the most guilty of NOT following my own advice. CON is going to be dangerous. Bonner and JJ? Only issue is they only have five players who play 35 minutes each. Note to self: this is the time of year the good teams rise to the top. Ex. LV last night. play..if I have one later.
best
Brutal (Traveling Day)
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Tuesday 5-4 (2-1 MAX) +13.75
HIT that DOUBLE MAX but only counting it as one in record but two on MAX PLAYS. so 127-110 (49-31)-61% MAX PLAYS. Really thought that DAL-CHI over tilt would be easy though. Thought that DOUBLE MAX 2H would be easy as well and I sweated that one out. Money MGT guys. And I am the most guilty of NOT following my own advice. CON is going to be dangerous. Bonner and JJ? Only issue is they only have five players who play 35 minutes each. Note to self: this is the time of year the good teams rise to the top. Ex. LV last night. play..if I have one later.
Yes Don Best did not list those till late. But it is that Natasha lesbian that now concerns me. this was the one game I did not get to watch and honestly I missed ..traveling etc. That she has come back. I still like the over. I am going to buy back some of the -1.5 spread and hope I don’t get middled. so now I would say regular (NOT A MAX) okay on total over ...and I want to wait a bit to see Line movement on spread. sorry guys. does not usually happen to brutal.
0
Yes Don Best did not list those till late. But it is that Natasha lesbian that now concerns me. this was the one game I did not get to watch and honestly I missed ..traveling etc. That she has come back. I still like the over. I am going to buy back some of the -1.5 spread and hope I don’t get middled. so now I would say regular (NOT A MAX) okay on total over ...and I want to wait a bit to see Line movement on spread. sorry guys. does not usually happen to brutal.
On another note let’s look at why MIN is a paper tiger. Last game is perfect example. anyone that can contain Sylvia Fowles will beat MIN like a drum. CON W Bonner and JJ did that a couple days again. Sylvia had like 5 boards. Both the lesbians w CON had more. points etc etc. this is a GREAT example of what will happen in the Playoffs. Bonner is a cut above Fowles and JJ is an offensive juggernaut against Sylvia. Stewie is a cut above Fowles
TINA is a better scorer and on level defensively to Sylvia
Aja is on her level but a better scorer
SYLVIA is better than GRiner I would say I know most would not agree give me Sylvia here
There are three teams that MIN cannot beat and one WSH that they may not beat .. since they MIN really do not have the guards to compensate
Bottom line.. MIN has no shot
IT comes down to SEA LV CON WSH? and I would be a bit shocked if LV wins this.
so this is why I have a lot of $$ on CON to win it all
Brutal
0
On another note let’s look at why MIN is a paper tiger. Last game is perfect example. anyone that can contain Sylvia Fowles will beat MIN like a drum. CON W Bonner and JJ did that a couple days again. Sylvia had like 5 boards. Both the lesbians w CON had more. points etc etc. this is a GREAT example of what will happen in the Playoffs. Bonner is a cut above Fowles and JJ is an offensive juggernaut against Sylvia. Stewie is a cut above Fowles
TINA is a better scorer and on level defensively to Sylvia
Aja is on her level but a better scorer
SYLVIA is better than GRiner I would say I know most would not agree give me Sylvia here
There are three teams that MIN cannot beat and one WSH that they may not beat .. since they MIN really do not have the guards to compensate
Bottom line.. MIN has no shot
IT comes down to SEA LV CON WSH? and I would be a bit shocked if LV wins this.
so this is why I have a lot of $$ on CON to win it all
Brutal the problem on Conn is they are a Con when it comes to the playoffs. They look good during regular season but choke in playoffs. I see Seattle with bird, lloyd, Stewart repeating again unless one of the gets injured.
0
Brutal the problem on Conn is they are a Con when it comes to the playoffs. They look good during regular season but choke in playoffs. I see Seattle with bird, lloyd, Stewart repeating again unless one of the gets injured.
Nice call Brutal... I sat on the sideline for this one but good for you guys that roll with that over. Seattle tried to shit the bed though. Win is a Win though.
0
Nice call Brutal... I sat on the sideline for this one but good for you guys that roll with that over. Seattle tried to shit the bed though. Win is a Win though.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
