I wasn't even considering taking either side here, but i see this line just went to 6.5 at Pinny. Now this number !!! I just can't pass up. I don't see any significant injuries for the Sky. The only thing i do see on several reports is that Sancho Lyttle will play tonight. She hasn't played in over 3 weeks with the team and i hardly think she's worth 2.5 points if you take the opening line into consideration. Small wager on the sky as a live dog.
MINNESOTA -2 1ST HALF ( 1 unit )
I'm throwing a curve ball here and taking the Lynx in the 1st half. Turnovers and shooting have been somewhat of 1st Q / 1ST H problem for the storm all year. Seattle shooting only 34 % percent in the 1st quarter this season and that's probably due to the fact that coach Agler puts too much emphasis on switching defenses and setting screens very early on. This won't work against an aggressive Lynx team that usually starts strong in every game. Bottom line I'd rather lay -2 instead of -4 Full game. Perfect example was Thursday's San Antonio's 69-66 win versus the Storm . The Silver Stars took a 9 point lead into the half but couldn't get the cover at the end winning by 3 while laying 4. We learn by our handicapping mistakes.
good luck
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
YTD 35-15 ( +32.50 )
5u 0-0 4u 1-0 3u 6-3 2u 13-8 1u 15-4
CHICAGO +6.5 ( 1 unit )
I wasn't even considering taking either side here, but i see this line just went to 6.5 at Pinny. Now this number !!! I just can't pass up. I don't see any significant injuries for the Sky. The only thing i do see on several reports is that Sancho Lyttle will play tonight. She hasn't played in over 3 weeks with the team and i hardly think she's worth 2.5 points if you take the opening line into consideration. Small wager on the sky as a live dog.
MINNESOTA -2 1ST HALF ( 1 unit )
I'm throwing a curve ball here and taking the Lynx in the 1st half. Turnovers and shooting have been somewhat of 1st Q / 1ST H problem for the storm all year. Seattle shooting only 34 % percent in the 1st quarter this season and that's probably due to the fact that coach Agler puts too much emphasis on switching defenses and setting screens very early on. This won't work against an aggressive Lynx team that usually starts strong in every game. Bottom line I'd rather lay -2 instead of -4 Full game. Perfect example was Thursday's San Antonio's 69-66 win versus the Storm . The Silver Stars took a 9 point lead into the half but couldn't get the cover at the end winning by 3 while laying 4. We learn by our handicapping mistakes.
With you on the Lynx -2.5 first half. My book(bet365) has Chicago+5.5 as of now. I would love to get it at +6.5 only way is to buy the points. Honestly, I think Chicago wins this outright.
0
With you on the Lynx -2.5 first half. My book(bet365) has Chicago+5.5 as of now. I would love to get it at +6.5 only way is to buy the points. Honestly, I think Chicago wins this outright.
With you on the Lynx -2.5 first half. My book(bet365) has Chicago+5.5 as of now. I would love to get it at +6.5 only way is to buy the points. Honestly, I think Chicago wins this outright.
Most books opened this half at Min -2.5. I took -2 with the Greek but had to lay -115
0
Quote Originally Posted by jedimaster:
With you on the Lynx -2.5 first half. My book(bet365) has Chicago+5.5 as of now. I would love to get it at +6.5 only way is to buy the points. Honestly, I think Chicago wins this outright.
Most books opened this half at Min -2.5. I took -2 with the Greek but had to lay -115
I'm throwing a curve ball here and taking the Lynx in the 1st half. Turnovers and shooting have been somewhat of 1st Q / 1ST H problem for the storm all year. Seattle shooting only 34 % percent in the 1st quarter this season and that's probably due to the fact that coach Agler puts too much emphasis on switching defenses and setting screens very early on. This won't work against an aggressive Lynx team that usually starts strong in every game. Bottom line I'd rather lay -2 instead of -4 Full game. Perfect example was Thursday's San Antonio's 69-66 win versus the Storm . The Silver Stars took a 9 point lead into the half but couldn't get the cover at the end winning by 3 while laying 4. We learn by our handicapping mistakes.
good luck
You threw the curve ball -- Minnesota caught it.
Thank you sir -- This play may help me win back my units from that sask riders catastrophe earlier today.
Thank you sir!
Your Chicago play looks solid as well --> Well fucking done!!
I need Eskimos -2.5 and I will be the happiest man in the world tonight.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 44-dimes:
MINNESOTA -2 1ST HALF ( 1 unit )
I'm throwing a curve ball here and taking the Lynx in the 1st half. Turnovers and shooting have been somewhat of 1st Q / 1ST H problem for the storm all year. Seattle shooting only 34 % percent in the 1st quarter this season and that's probably due to the fact that coach Agler puts too much emphasis on switching defenses and setting screens very early on. This won't work against an aggressive Lynx team that usually starts strong in every game. Bottom line I'd rather lay -2 instead of -4 Full game. Perfect example was Thursday's San Antonio's 69-66 win versus the Storm . The Silver Stars took a 9 point lead into the half but couldn't get the cover at the end winning by 3 while laying 4. We learn by our handicapping mistakes.
good luck
You threw the curve ball -- Minnesota caught it.
Thank you sir -- This play may help me win back my units from that sask riders catastrophe earlier today.
Thank you sir!
Your Chicago play looks solid as well --> Well fucking done!!
I need Eskimos -2.5 and I will be the happiest man in the world tonight.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.