Georgia’s Legal Sports Betting Efforts Coming Down to the Wire (Again)

Even if the state's House passes sports betting-related legislation by Thursday, it won’t give the Senate a lot of time to discuss it or make any changes. 

Geoff Zochodne - Senior News Analyst at Covers.com
Geoff Zochodne • Senior News Analyst
Mar 3, 2025 • 17:31 ET • 4 min read
Photo By - Imagn Images.

There’s a lot to do and not much time to do it if Georgia is going to legalize sports betting this year or at the ballot box in 2026. After a Georgia Senate committee shot down a sports betting-related resolution last week, the focus turns to the state House of Representatives to see if it can pass legislation and cross over to the other chamber before Thursday's deadline.

Republican Rep. Marcus Wiedower and like-minded lawmakers filed two pieces of legislation last week that could lead to Georgia sports betting legalization. That is, of course, if they have enough backing in the legislature.

Both measures are scheduled for a committee hearing Tuesday that will provide insight into the House's mood. One of the Senate's concerns was the House's past hangups regarding sports betting, which helped to kill previous legalization efforts. 

Buzzer beater bills

Georgia’s legislature is also scheduled to adjourn Apr. 4. So, even if the House passes sports betting-related legislation by Thursday, it won’t leave the Senate a lot of time to discuss it or make any changes. 

Last year’s effort to legalize sports betting in Georgia came down to the wire, and it looks like this year will be a similar situation — and that’s only if supporters are lucky.

The first House measure set for debate this week is House Resolution 450, which proposes amending the Georgia constitution to allow the General Assembly to pass a sports betting-enabling bill. If two-thirds of lawmakers pass it, voters would be asked the following question on their 2026 general election ballot:

“Shall the Constitution of Georgia be amended so as to authorize sports betting in this state to provide additional funding for pre-kindergarten and HOPE scholarships?"

If a majority of voters say yes, it would then be up to lawmakers to get legal sports betting over the finish line. However, H.R. 450 does have some guidelines for how sports wagering would look in the southern state, such as creating a special trust fund to house sports gambling proceeds. 

Of the first $150 million in annual proceeds, 15% would be appropriated for addiction and problem gambling services. The General Assembly would then appropriate the other 85% of the first $150 million in proceeds, and then 100% beyond that, for voluntary pre-kindergarten and other educational programs.

The resolution also ensures the Georgia Lottery Corp. could offer sports betting. Other than that, lawmakers would have to fill in the remaining blanks.

In this way, H.R. 450 is similar to Senate Resolution 131, which a committee rejected last week. S.R. 131 was light on details as well, but included directions for how to use tax revenue and included casino authorization.

Door number two 

The other measure the Georgia House's Higher Education Committee is scheduled to discuss Tuesday is House Bill 686, which would bypass a referendum. Whether supporters need a ballot measure to offer sports betting in the state at all has been a long-running debate.

At any rate, the proposed “Georgia Sports Betting Act” would authorize online event wagering under the eye of the Georgia Lottery, which could also take bets. The proposed legislation is far more prescriptive than H.R. 450.

H.B. 686 says the lottery corporation can issue up to 16 online sports betting licenses, five reserved for Georgia's professional sports teams, one for the PGA Tour, one for Augusta National Golf Club (home of the Masters), one for the Atlanta Motor Speedway's owner, and one for the lottery itself.

The other seven online sports betting licenses are standalone permits, meaning they're not "tethered" to those teams or facilities and will be awarded via a public procurement process. At any rate, any so-called "Type 1" licensee can contract with an online sports betting services provider to run a book on their behalf.

Online sports betting licensees would have to pay a 20% tax on their adjusted gross income, in addition to a $100,000 application fee and a $1 million annual licensing fee. The tax revenue raised would go to fund state education, such as via tuition grants and voluntary pre-kindergarten programs.

Bettors would have to be 21 or older under the proposed legislation. Online sportsbooks would also be banned from offering college prop bets.

There's more, but all of it is moot if the committee and the House don't pass the bill this week. Whether that happens remains to be seen.

Pages related to this topic

Geoff Zochodne, Covers Sports Betting Journalist
Senior News Analyst

Geoff has been writing about the legalization and regulation of sports betting in Canada and the United States for more than three years. His work has included coverage of launches in New York, Ohio, and Ontario, numerous court proceedings, and the decriminalization of single-game wagering by Canadian lawmakers. As an expert on the growing online gambling industry in North America, Geoff has appeared on and been cited by publications and networks such as Axios, TSN Radio, and VSiN. Prior to joining Covers, he spent 10 years as a journalist reporting on business and politics, including a stint at the Ontario legislature. More recently, Geoff’s work has focused on the pending launch of a competitive iGaming market in Alberta, the evolution of major companies within the gambling industry, and efforts by U.S. state regulators to rein in offshore activity and college player prop betting.

Popular Content

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo