LIVE 00:29 2nd Nov 25
MICH 75 -9.5 o146.5
VT 63 9.5 u146.5
LIVE 02:19 2nd Nov 25
CLEM 65 -2.5 o144.5
SF 47 2.5 u144.5
LIVE 18:29 1st Nov 25
LIU 5 12.5 o153.0
WIN 0 -12.5 u153.0
COR -1.5 o159.0
IONA 1.5 u159.0
LIVE 12:40 2nd Nov 25
WIGB 51 25.0 o154.0
OSU 58 -25.0 u154.0
LIVE 18:21 1st Nov 25
UNH 0 17.0 o146.0
CLMB 0 -17.0 u146.0
LIVE 19:02 1st Nov 25
TAMCOM 0 1.5 o137.5
STONE 3 -1.5 u137.5
LIVE 16:29 1st Nov 25
CARU 7 -0.0 o0.0
NCCU 9 0.0 u0.0
LIVE 07:50 2nd Nov 25
WCOLL 37 -0.0 o0.0
NAVY 80 0.0 u0.0
LIVE 11:43 2nd Nov 25
NCAT 64 3.0 o160.0
BUFF 63 -3.0 u160.0
TNST 10.0 o153.0
CHAT -10.0 u153.0
LIVE 08:54 1st Nov 25
MOSU 26 2.5 o133.5
BC 29 -2.5 u133.5
LIVE 18:30 1st Nov 25
MISCM 5
NICH 0
LIVE 18:56 1st Nov 25
LEM 0 13.0 o152.5
UTRGV 2 -13.0 u152.5
LIVE 16:45 1st Nov 25
UTECH 9 11.0 o146.0
MONT 10 -11.0 u146.0
IW 7.0 o141.5
USA -7.0 u141.5
LIVE 13:35 1st Nov 25
INST 6 -3.0 o152.0
USI 11 3.0 u152.0
LIVE 09:32 1st Nov 25
UTSA 18 11.0 o150.0
TROY 20 -11.0 u150.0
LIVE 09:27 1st Nov 25
ORST 11 5.0 o127.5
UNT 8 -5.0 u127.5
LIVE 09:50 1st Nov 25
UMES 8 35.0 o145.5
ARK 26 -35.0 u145.5
LIVE 08:41 1st Nov 25
EMU 21 -2.5 o130.0
HCU 19 2.5 u130.0
LIVE 08:42 1st Nov 25
CMU 23 13.0 o128.0
MINN 21 -13.0 u128.0
LIVE 11:22 1st Nov 25
QUIN 17 10.5 o158.5
SLU 14 -10.5 u158.5
LIVE 11:20 1st Nov 25
MCNS 13 -1.5 o134.0
LIB 14 1.5 u134.0
RU -0.0 o0.0
SDAK 0.0 u0.0
RSTATE -0.0 o0.0
ORU 0.0 u0.0
SCAR 5.0 o148.5
XAV -5.0 u148.5
SJSU 4.0 o136.0
UTEP -4.0 u136.0
NORF 6.5 o146.5
UCD -6.5 u146.5
AUB -3.5 o143.5
ISU 3.5 u143.5
ACU -3.0 o149.5
USM 3.0 u149.5
ERAZ -0.0 o0.0
IDST 0.0 u0.0
UALR 23.0 o152.0
ILL -23.0 u152.0
-0.0 o0.0
WEB 0.0 u0.0
LBSU 7.5 o132.0
UNCG -7.5 u132.0
DAY 9.0 o155.5
UNC -9.0 u155.5
Final Nov 25
RAD 63 -14.0 o141.5
CHS 48 14.0 u141.5
Final Nov 25
HAMP 64 6.5 o135.0
DUQ 59 -6.5 u135.0
Final Nov 25
M-OH 70 -4.5 o136.0
SIE 58 4.5 u136.0
Final Nov 25
BALL 63 3.0 o148.5
EKY 61 -3.0 u148.5
Final Nov 25
HOW 77 -2.0 o153.0
UMBC 95 2.0 u153.0
Final Nov 25
CHAMP 58 -0.0 o0.0
SOU 121 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 25
UAB 98 -11.5 o156.0
ULL 86 11.5 u156.0
Final Nov 25
DREX 81 5.5 o146.0
PFW 87 -5.5 u146.0
Final Nov 25
BSU 83 -13.0 o148.0
SDST 82 13.0 u148.0
Final OT Nov 25
JAC 89 -4.0 o147.5
MER 90 4.0 u147.5
Final OT Nov 25
MEM 99 8.0 o149.0
CONN 97 -8.0 u149.0
Final Nov 25
INDPU 88 5.5 o143.0
AAMU 83 -5.5 u143.0
Final OT Nov 25
SIU 79 5.0 o143.5
LT 85 -5.0 u143.5
Final Nov 25
ILST 64 2.5 o149.0
GW 72 -2.5 u149.0
Final Nov 25
CSN 89 -8.0 o155.0
DEN 60 8.0 u155.0
Final Nov 25
PSU 85 -16.0 o151.5
FOR 66 16.0 u151.5
Final Nov 25
HP 73 -14.5 o145.5
ODU 67 14.5 u145.5
Final Nov 25
COLO 56 7.5 o144.0
MSU 72 -7.5 u144.0
Final Nov 25
LONG 64 10.5 o142.0
KSU 80 -10.5 u142.0
Final Nov 25
RICH 67 -0.0 o0.0
FLATC 57 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 25
MW 74 7.5 o137.5
UMASS 81 -7.5 u137.5
Wisconsin 0th Big Ten18-13
Maryland 0th Big Ten17-14

Wisconsin @ Maryland preview

Xfinity Center

Last Meeting ( Dec 28, 2020 ) Maryland 70, Wisconsin 64

No. 14 Wisconsin prides itself on being one of college basketball's best defensive teams.

The Badgers are looking to re-establish that identity when they play four of their next five games on the road, beginning with a Big Ten contest against Maryland on Wednesday night in College Park, Md.

They were disappointed with their defensive performance in a 74-62 loss to then-No. 15 Ohio State on Saturday. The Buckeyes shot 50.9 percent on Wisconsin's home court and never trailed.

"We never set the tone defensively for how we have been and who we need to be," Badgers coach Greg Gard said.

Wisconsin (12-4, 6-3 Big Ten) is holding opponents to 40.5 percent shooting this season. The Badgers were coming off a pair of strong defensive efforts, when they held Rutgers to 54 points and Northwestern to 52. In contrast, the Buckeyes scored 42 second-half points while shooting 56 percent in the final 20 minutes.

"If we're going to win these games, we've got to lock them up defensively," forward Nate Reuvers said. "They just got too comfortable and that's kind of how they got going."

The Badgers often play low-possession games and rely on their 3-pointers to overcome the lack of a dominant scorer. They are shooting 37.9 percent from beyond the arc, but they knocked down just 7 of 28 3-pointers on Saturday.

"I thought the vast majority of the threes we had were really good looks -- we had some wide-open ones -- other than two or three that come to mind initially," Gard said. "I'll look through and go back through those.

"... We'll look and see if we could go in the paint more, which I know we can. But with how this team shoots it and how this team is built, we have to take advantage of those threes when the good ones present themselves and we had plenty of good ones early."

It would help if leading scorer D'Mitrik Trice heated up again. Trice, who is averaging 14.6 points for the season, has averaged 12.3 points over the last three games. In his five prior Big Ten outings, he reached the 20-point mark four times.

The Badgers are trying to avenge one of their three Big Ten losses this season. The Terrapins pulled off a 70-64 upset in their first meeting on Dec. 28 despite a 25-point outing from Trice.

Maryland's Eric Ayala and Aaron Wiggins combined for 32 points in the game.

The Terrapins (9-7, 3-6) haven't played a Big Ten home game since Jan. 7, when they lost by 22 to Iowa.

They are coming off their best defensive performance of the season. Maryland held Minnesota to 30.4 percent shooting in a 63-49 upset in Minneapolis on Saturday. Ayala led the way with 21 points.

"I wish we could bottle it all up and play that way every time, but we haven't been able to do that yet," Terrapins coach Mark Turgeon said.

A small-ball lineup helped them shut down the Golden Gophers. Maryland often used a four-guard look.

"We started the small lineup," Turgeon said. "I started five veteran guys that were here last year, just looking for a spark, looking for something to get us going."

--Field Level Media

Pages Related to This Topic