LIVE End Jan 29
UNLV 71 10.5 o146.0
USU 76 -10.5 u146.0
LIVE 03:20 2nd Jan 29
SYR 56 12.0 o148.0
STAN 62 -12.0 u148.0
Final Jan 29
COLG 72 -5.5 o143.5
ARMY 84 5.5 u143.5
Final Jan 29
CHSO 82 -3.0 o151.5
SCUS 75 3.0 u151.5
Final Jan 29
SAM 70 -2.0 o150.0
FUR 72 2.0 u150.0
Final Jan 29
ODU 78 10.5 o128.0
APP 77 -10.5 u128.0
Final Jan 29
PRE 67 7.5 o149.0
WIN 76 -7.5 u149.0
Final Jan 29
RAD 65 1.0 o142.5
UNCA 72 -1.0 u142.5
Final Jan 29
HOU 63 -9.0 o123.5
WVU 49 9.0 u123.5
Final Jan 29
UVA 82 2.0 o134.5
MIA 71 -2.0 u134.5
Final Jan 29
DUQ 72 9.0 o137.5
JOES 76 -9.0 u137.5
Final Jan 29
VT 76 11.5 o143.0
FSU 66 -11.5 u143.0
Final Jan 29
NAVY 79 1.5 o138.0
LEH 54 -1.5 u138.0
Final Jan 29
UNI 52 7.5 o122.0
DRKE 66 -7.5 u122.0
Final Jan 29
RICH 66 8.0 o135.0
GW 75 -8.0 u135.0
Final Jan 29
L-MD 67 5.0 o137.0
BUCK 79 -5.0 u137.0
Final Jan 29
AMER 75 -1.0 o133.0
LAF 68 1.0 u133.0
Final Jan 29
ETSU 65 1.5 o138.0
UNCG 70 -1.5 u138.0
Final Jan 29
MASS 82 3.5 o157.0
URI 88 -3.5 u157.0
Final 0OT Jan 29
CHAR 89 9.0 o146.0
TEM 90 -9.0 u146.0
Final Jan 29
MOSU 67 5.5 o146.5
INST 72 -5.5 u146.5
Final Jan 29
TCU 57 11.5 o135.5
TTU 71 -11.5 u135.5
Final Jan 29
UTSA 74 9.0 o159.0
FAU 94 -9.0 u159.0
Final Jan 29
FOR 88 3.0 o148.5
LAS 72 -3.0 u148.5
Final Jan 29
CHAT 84 -10.5 o147.5
WCU 60 10.5 u147.5
Final Jan 29
WIS 68 5.5 o152.0
MD 76 -5.5 u152.0
Final Jan 29
VMI 74 11.0 o140.5
WOF 67 -11.0 u140.5
Final Jan 29
UNA 67 -4.0 o153.0
QNC 75 4.0 u153.0
Final Jan 29
LONG 87 -1.0 o149.0
WEBB 92 1.0 u149.0
Final Jan 29
AUB 87 -12.0 o150.0
LSU 74 12.0 u150.0
Final Jan 29
FGCU 83 2.5 o136.0
JAC 79 -2.5 u136.0
Final OT Jan 29
STET 100 9.0 o162.5
UNF 101 -9.0 u162.5
Final Jan 29
CIT 46 13.5 o145.0
MER 80 -13.5 u145.0
Final OT Jan 29
L-IL 53 6.5 o132.0
GMU 58 -6.5 u132.0
Final Jan 29
UWG 70 1.5 o138.0
CARK 75 -1.5 u138.0
Final Jan 29
UNT 58 -4.0 o133.5
WICH 54 4.0 u133.5
Final Jan 29
UAB 78 -7.0 o154.0
TLSA 68 7.0 u154.0
Final Jan 29
ARST 81 -9.0 o152.0
USM 68 9.0 u152.0
Final Jan 29
NEOM 87 -1.5 o170.0
SDAK 91 1.5 u170.0
Final Jan 29
ORU 71 13.5 o156.5
STT 86 -13.5 u156.5
Final Jan 29
MURR 74 -5.0 o134.5
EVAN 78 5.0 u134.5
Final Jan 29
UIC 93 8.0 o147.5
BRAD 70 -8.0 u147.5
Final Jan 29
DEP 61 13.5 o141.0
CONN 72 -13.5 u141.0
Final Jan 29
OKST 57 7.0 o143.0
KSU 85 -7.0 u143.0
Final Jan 29
XAV 77 7.0 o143.5
CREI 86 -7.0 u143.5
Final Jan 29
SMC 67 -4.0 o141.0
SCU 54 4.0 u141.0
Final Jan 29
RUTG 79 9.5 o138.5
NW 72 -9.5 u138.5
Final Jan 29
CAL 65 13.0 o152.0
SMU 76 -13.0 u152.0
Final Jan 29
TEX 69 6.5 o142.0
MISS 72 -6.5 u142.0
Final Jan 29
BEL 78 2.0 o154.5
ILST 81 -2.0 u154.5
Final Jan 29
ALA 88 1.5 o166.0
MSST 84 -1.5 u166.0
Final Jan 29
NEV 56 7.5 o136.5
BSU 66 -7.5 u136.5
North Carolina 7th ACC13-9
Pittsburgh 8th ACC14-6

North Carolina @ Pittsburgh preview

Petersen Events Center

Last Meeting ( Mar 15, 2024 ) Pittsburgh 65, North Carolina 72

Both coming off wins and needing more to boost their respective NCAA Tournament resumes, visiting North Carolina and Pitt will tangle on Tuesday night.

The Tar Heels (13-8, 6-3 ACC) and Panthers (13-6, 4-4) both ended losing streaks on Saturday. On its home floor, North Carolina squeaked out a six-point overtime victory over Boston College, while Pitt bested Syracuse by four points in upstate New York.

According to the current NET rankings, a victory for UNC on Tuesday would go down as a Quad 1 win, while a triumph for Pitt would be a tally in the Quad 2 column. The teams will also play on Feb. 8 in Chapel Hill, N.C.

Without Armando Bacot patrolling the paint this season, the Tar Heels have opted for a small-ball, fast-paced style that has them scoring 82.5 points per game, which ranks second in the ACC. The Tar Heels, however, haven't been all that effective on 3-point attempts. Their 32.3 percent success rate is 13th in the ACC.

"The makeup of their team is different. At times, like last game, they started four guards. So, if any of those guards get it, they're all able to push and attack," Pitt coach Jeff Capel said of the Tar Heels. "I do think they're playing faster than they have the past few years."

Those guards all score in double figures. RJ Davis puts up 17.7 points per game, followed by Ian Jackson (15), Seth Trimble (12.4) and Elliot Cadeau (10.7, plus a team-high 6.1 assists). Davis, an All-American a season ago, had 22 points against Boston College.

Pitt has its own talented guards leading the way: sophomore Jaland Lowe and senior Ishmael Leggett. Lowe posts 17.6 points and 5.7 assists per game, while Leggett averages 16.6 points and 5.6 rebounds.

Against Syracuse, the backcourt duo combined for 38 points, eight rebounds and six assists.

"They've got a number of guys that can get hot from 3. They've got guards that are good with the ball, whether it's one-on-one or pick-and-roll situations. They can create shots not only for themselves, but for their teammates," UNC coach Hubert Davis said of Pitt. "Coach Capel does a great job."

North Carolina is beginning a stretch of four road games in their next five. The Tar Heels swept the Panthers last season and are 10-7 against Pitt since it joined the ACC in 2013.

--Field Level Media

Pages Related to This Topic