Final Mar 13
BGSU 67 11.5 o149.0
AKR 96 -11.5 u149.0
Final Mar 13
DUQ 59 2.0 o130.0
SBON 64 -2.0 u130.0
Final Mar 13
BUT 57 12.0 o145.5
SJU 78 -12.0 u145.5
Final Mar 13
IND 59 2.0 o142.0
ORE 72 -2.0 u142.0
Final Mar 13
GT 70 23.0 o144.5
DUKE 78 -23.0 u144.5
Final Mar 13
ISU 92 -2.5 o146.0
BYU 96 2.5 u146.0
Final Mar 13
USF 68 3.0 o144.5
WICH 73 -3.0 u144.5
Final Mar 13
ARK 80 4.5 o147.0
MISS 83 -4.5 u147.0
Final OT Mar 13
OHIO 85 -2.5 o158.5
TOL 90 2.5 u158.5
Final Mar 13
DAV 75 4.0 o142.0
SLU 83 -4.0 u142.0
Final Mar 13
ALST 84 1.0 o137.5
TXSO 79 -1.0 u137.5
Final Mar 13
UNC 68 -6.0 o148.0
WAKE 59 6.0 u148.0
Final Mar 13
MARQ 89 -2.5 o145.0
XAV 87 2.5 u145.0
Final Mar 13
NW 63 8.5 o141.5
WIS 70 -8.5 u141.5
Final Mar 13
CHAR 59 10.0 o144.5
FAU 64 -10.0 u144.5
Final Mar 13
SJSU 52 16.0 o150.5
UNM 63 -16.0 u150.5
Final Mar 13
COLO 68 17.5 o127.5
HOU 77 -17.5 u127.5
Final 2OT Mar 13
TEX 94 6.0 o140.5
TXAM 89 -6.0 u140.5
Final Mar 13
EMU 75 4.5 o149.5
M-OH 81 -4.5 u149.5
Final Mar 13
FOR 81 6.5 o144.0
GW 88 -6.5 u144.0
Final Mar 13
BSU 62 -1.5 o134.5
SDSU 52 1.5 u134.5
Final Mar 13
MAN 65 2.5 o144.0
IONA 77 -2.5 u144.0
Final Mar 13
MORG 91 3.5 o161.5
HOW 90 -3.5 u161.5
Final Mar 13
IOWA 94 10.0 o164.5
ILL 106 -10.0 u164.5
Final Mar 13
WMU 66 10.5 o143.5
KENT 73 -10.5 u143.5
Final Mar 13
NMSU 77 1.0 o136.5
KENN 80 -1.0 u136.5
Final Mar 13
TLSA 75 3.0 o143.5
TEM 71 -3.0 u143.5
Final 2OT Mar 13
DEP 81 13.0 o143.5
CREI 85 -13.0 u143.5
Final Mar 13
STAN 73 10.5 o144.0
LOU 75 -10.5 u144.0
Final Mar 13
BAY 74 6.5 o142.0
TTU 76 -6.5 u142.0
Final Mar 13
LAS 70 12.5 o144.0
JOES 75 -12.5 u144.0
Final Mar 13
MSST 73 3.0 o158.5
MIZZ 85 -3.0 u158.5
Final Mar 13
NCCU 79 1.0 o153.0
DSU 77 -1.0 u153.0
Final Mar 13
MSM 62 4.5 o127.0
MRST 58 -4.5 u127.0
Final Mar 13
ALCN 60 3.0 o134.0
COOK 69 -3.0 u134.0
Final 2OT Mar 13
LT 75 2.0 o142.0
MTU 77 -2.0 u142.0
Final Mar 13
USC 71 10.5 o151.0
PUR 76 -10.5 u151.0
Final Mar 13
NEV 59 5.0 o138.0
CSU 67 -5.0 u138.0
Final Mar 13
UCSB 78 3.5 o151.5
CSN 72 -3.5 u151.5
Final Mar 13
SEA 69 -6.0 o133.5
AC 63 6.0 u133.5
Final Mar 13
KU 77 3.0 o153.0
ARIZ 88 -3.0 u153.0
Final Mar 13
SMU 54 7.0 o142.5
CLEM 57 -7.0 u142.5
Final Mar 13
UTSA 65 5.0 o147.0
ECU 70 -5.0 u147.0
Final Mar 13
VILL 56 7.0 o135.0
CONN 73 -7.0 u135.0
Final Mar 13
OKLA 84 6.5 o161.5
UK 85 -6.5 u161.5
Final Mar 13
CP 96 4.5 o164.0
UCRV 83 -4.5 u164.0
Final Mar 13
UNLV 58 8.0 o142.0
USU 70 -8.0 u142.0
Final Mar 13
TST 51 5.5 o128.0
CBU 55 -5.5 u128.0
Purdue 6th Big Ten21-10
Michigan 3rd Big Ten22-9

Purdue @ Michigan preview

Crisler Center

Last Meeting ( Jan 24, 2025 ) Michigan 64, Purdue 91

It's February, so it's prime season for showdowns between top teams in each conference.

One of those clashes will feature seventh-ranked Purdue at No. 20 Michigan in Big Ten play Tuesday night in Ann Arbor.

Purdue enters the game atop the league standings at 11-2 (19-5 overall), a half-game ahead of Michigan (18-5, 10-2) and Michigan State as the Big Ten title race enters its final weeks.

Purdue can take a great step toward its third straight regular-season championship by continuing its torrid play.

The Boilermakers have won four straight games and 11 of their last 12 games, with one of those victories a 91-64 home blowout of Michigan on Jan. 24.

Purdue coach Matt Painter knows the crucial finishing stretch is coming up but just wants his team to focus on improving each game.

"That's what we want to grow," he said. "We have to fix some things here while we're winning a couple games. There are some shortcomings we have to clean up and be better. We have to be around the ball more, have to defend better, contain better, be in gaps better, have better man awareness. If you have a team that's mature, they understand that. Hopefully, we get that response and understand we have to be better if we're going to win our next game on the road."

Purdue, which is coming off a 90-72 home victory Friday over Southern California, has been paced by the trio of forward Trey Kaufman-Renn -- who averages 18.9 points a game and has shot 42.9 percent from 3-point range -- and guards Braden Smith (16.1 ppg, 8.8 assists) and Fletcher Loyer (13.8 ppg, 45.8 percent from long distance).

For Michigan, it will be one of the biggest home game in years and a chance to not only take over the top spot in the Big Ten, but to pay back Purdue for that lopsided defeat earlier this season.

The Wolverines have won four straight games under first-year head coach Dusty May and have been led by the dynamic frontcourt duo of 7-footers Vladislav Goldin (15.7 ppg) and Danny Wolf (12.7 ppg, 10 rebounds per game).

In particular, Wolf has become a revelation after transferring from Yale. He not only leads the league in rebounding, but he regularly handles the ball like a point guard and initiates the offense, drawing lots of attention from NBA scouts with his versatility and ability to create mismatches.

May said Wolf does many small things for the team that other players feed off of.

"We don't want those highlight-reel plays to define Danny Wolf," May said. "He does so many other things to help us win, and the gravity he requires and what not is really important for other guys to be successful. We're still trying to figure out our offensive flow and rhythm. I do think we took a step forward (on Saturday in a 70-67 win at Indiana). I thought we had pretty sound role definition for the most part."

Purdue has won the last four meetings against Michigan.

--Field Level Media

Pages Related to This Topic