Paul Williams was not over rated, he fought anyone from 147-160 who didn't avoid him (he is not over rated in boxer's minds or more would have fought him). Why didn't Cotto or Mayweather fight PW, cause not worth the risk. All he had to do was avoid southpaws and he would probably still be undefeated.
Pavlik vs. Williams would have been a great war while it lasted, I say put him in with JC Chavez, Kirkland or Augulo, you would have a great fight for sure.
Paul Williams was not over rated, he fought anyone from 147-160 who didn't avoid him (he is not over rated in boxer's minds or more would have fought him). Why didn't Cotto or Mayweather fight PW, cause not worth the risk. All he had to do was avoid southpaws and he would probably still be undefeated.
Pavlik vs. Williams would have been a great war while it lasted, I say put him in with JC Chavez, Kirkland or Augulo, you would have a great fight for sure.
which kermit are we talking about? the one that fought angulo or the one that fought williams?
if the one that fought angulo shows up tonight, kermit is a very live dog at +600. in fact, he should be even money.
if not, i like the under as kermit's fights that dont go the distance are a short night as he checks in early.
no need to take extra unishment as he is not getting paid more to do so.
which kermit are we talking about? the one that fought angulo or the one that fought williams?
if the one that fought angulo shows up tonight, kermit is a very live dog at +600. in fact, he should be even money.
if not, i like the under as kermit's fights that dont go the distance are a short night as he checks in early.
no need to take extra unishment as he is not getting paid more to do so.
which kermit are we talking about? the one that fought angulo or the one that fought williams?
if the one that fought angulo shows up tonight, kermit is a very live dog at +600. in fact, he should be even money.
if not, i like the under as kermit's fights that dont go the distance are a short night as he checks in early.
no need to take extra unishment as he is not getting paid more to do so.
which kermit are we talking about? the one that fought angulo or the one that fought williams?
if the one that fought angulo shows up tonight, kermit is a very live dog at +600. in fact, he should be even money.
if not, i like the under as kermit's fights that dont go the distance are a short night as he checks in early.
no need to take extra unishment as he is not getting paid more to do so.
read my post. if the cintron that fought angulo still existed this fight should be even money.
and as i said, if that cintron no longer exists then take the under as when cintron checks out he checks out early.
ww matthew hatton lasted the full twelve. cintron couldnt even make it past five.
he came to collect a paycheck.
read my post. if the cintron that fought angulo still existed this fight should be even money.
and as i said, if that cintron no longer exists then take the under as when cintron checks out he checks out early.
ww matthew hatton lasted the full twelve. cintron couldnt even make it past five.
he came to collect a paycheck.
read my post. if the cintron that fought angulo still existed this fight should be even money.
and as i said, if that cintron no longer exists then take the under as when cintron checks out he checks out early.
ww matthew hatton lasted the full twelve. cintron couldnt even make it past five.
he came to collect a paycheck.
read my post. if the cintron that fought angulo still existed this fight should be even money.
and as i said, if that cintron no longer exists then take the under as when cintron checks out he checks out early.
ww matthew hatton lasted the full twelve. cintron couldnt even make it past five.
he came to collect a paycheck.
not sure if this would qualify as a test because cintron never showed up.
not sure if this would qualify as a test because cintron never showed up.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.