• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    Diaz/JMM, Juarez/John Picks

    «First Previous 123
    Buzzcat
    nuttyrich
    frankoo1976
    ghostkid
    Redlad
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 2193
    Posts: 64
    «First Previous 123
     
    Buzzcat
    Buzzcat
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 1858
    Posted: Mar. 1, 2009 - 12:36 AM ET #51

    I had JMM by 1 at the stoppage, The knockout punch was a left to the liver. He schooled the young man. And yes, Mayweather would destroy him.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I had JMM by 1 at the stoppage, The knockout punch was a left to the liver. He schooled the young man. And yes, Mayweather would destroy him.
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Mar. 1, 2009 - 1:07 AM ET #52

    Quote Originally Posted by FrankieNapp:

    How does Duane Ford have Marquez up 2 rounds before the stoppage?
     
    C'mon......at best for Marquez.....That fight was a draw. But up 2 rounds? You have to be kidding me.
     
    Obviously, it is a moot point......But that is nonsense.


    It's NOT non sense, if you MUTED the TV and just watched the fight not hearing the crowd oooh and ahhh on every punch, remember Marquez was allowing him to give the illusion he was landing heavier punches than what he actually was. Marquez landed the CLEANER Crisper shots the WHOLE fight. Marquez still fought a bad fight he could of won even more lopsided, but he's chasing a ghost called Pacman who has moved on to bigger and MORE Profitable things. Why would Pacman fight a third war with JMM when he can fight the likes of a washed up De la Hoya for mega paydays and a big paday for beating a "decent" Ricky Hatton.

    Give credit to Hatton he tasted 147 and was smart enough and honest enough to say "I don't have the power at 147" and dropped back down to 140.

    Marquez needs to drop down a weight  class and fight whatever is there, any other fighter at this weight tonight with a punch would of HURT HIM as JMM's chin is not "STRONG" he just had the perfect guy in front of him who couldn't hurt him. I know moving up in weight class means BIGGER paydays, but tonight showed Marquez is not strong at this weight and needs to drop back down otherwise he will be a stepping stone himself. Again he needs to give up the idea of fighting Pacman that's over, and throwing Mayweather's name is a bit odd being Mayweather is in retirement and would destroy Marquez.
    Either way was an amazing fight for the fight fans, hope everyone enjoyed it!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by FrankieNapp:

    How does Duane Ford have Marquez up 2 rounds before the stoppage?
     
    C'mon......at best for Marquez.....That fight was a draw. But up 2 rounds? You have to be kidding me.
     
    Obviously, it is a moot point......But that is nonsense.


    It's NOT non sense, if you MUTED the TV and just watched the fight not hearing the crowd oooh and ahhh on every punch, remember Marquez was allowing him to give the illusion he was landing heavier punches than what he actually was. Marquez landed the CLEANER Crisper shots the WHOLE fight. Marquez still fought a bad fight he could of won even more lopsided, but he's chasing a ghost called Pacman who has moved on to bigger and MORE Profitable things. Why would Pacman fight a third war with JMM when he can fight the likes of a washed up De la Hoya for mega paydays and a big paday for beating a "decent" Ricky Hatton.

    Give credit to Hatton he tasted 147 and was smart enough and honest enough to say "I don't have the power at 147" and dropped back down to 140.

    Marquez needs to drop down a weight  class and fight whatever is there, any other fighter at this weight tonight with a punch would of HURT HIM as JMM's chin is not "STRONG" he just had the perfect guy in front of him who couldn't hurt him. I know moving up in weight class means BIGGER paydays, but tonight showed Marquez is not strong at this weight and needs to drop back down otherwise he will be a stepping stone himself. Again he needs to give up the idea of fighting Pacman that's over, and throwing Mayweather's name is a bit odd being Mayweather is in retirement and would destroy Marquez.
    Either way was an amazing fight for the fight fans, hope everyone enjoyed it!
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Mar. 1, 2009 - 1:15 AM ET #53

    Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

    I think going into the ropes was part of Marquez's plan, even though it looked like Diaz was dominating when they were in that position JMM was still landing the bigger punches. I thought that Diaz was up by 2 rounds before going down (factoring in that it was in Houston).

    You are right about Diaz's career being derailed by this though, I'd say hes going to be the lightweight version of Cintron. Everybody knows hes a decent fight that can beat lower opponents but can't step up in real fights.


    Cintron is actually worse, he was losing many of his fights and came back to win because of his strong right hand.

    Sadly for Diaz he isn't a strong puncher, but he can dish it out but cannot take it. Being a good body puncher and throwing tons of punches is great against inferior opponets.But when a guy actually HITS YOU BACK that test the true "baby bull", in this case the baby bull was just that just a baby who was handled very well until he had to fight legit fighters. Personally I know nate Campbell was a Tune up and Nate destroyed HIM, and I said many times on other posts I don't know why Diaz's CAMP would take this fight of all the fights out there, this was the WORST case scenario for Diaz, he needs so someone like himself, ala Gatti/Mickey(setup) ward, someone who compliments your style not someone who show cases your every weakness!

    His camp is just as much as to blame for taking a mismatch like this.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

    I think going into the ropes was part of Marquez's plan, even though it looked like Diaz was dominating when they were in that position JMM was still landing the bigger punches. I thought that Diaz was up by 2 rounds before going down (factoring in that it was in Houston).

    You are right about Diaz's career being derailed by this though, I'd say hes going to be the lightweight version of Cintron. Everybody knows hes a decent fight that can beat lower opponents but can't step up in real fights.


    Cintron is actually worse, he was losing many of his fights and came back to win because of his strong right hand.

    Sadly for Diaz he isn't a strong puncher, but he can dish it out but cannot take it. Being a good body puncher and throwing tons of punches is great against inferior opponets.But when a guy actually HITS YOU BACK that test the true "baby bull", in this case the baby bull was just that just a baby who was handled very well until he had to fight legit fighters. Personally I know nate Campbell was a Tune up and Nate destroyed HIM, and I said many times on other posts I don't know why Diaz's CAMP would take this fight of all the fights out there, this was the WORST case scenario for Diaz, he needs so someone like himself, ala Gatti/Mickey(setup) ward, someone who compliments your style not someone who show cases your every weakness!

    His camp is just as much as to blame for taking a mismatch like this.
     
    frankoo1976
    frankoo1976
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 5
    Posted: Mar. 1, 2009 - 2:56 AM ET #54

    Yes "nuttyrich" i meant (decent) defense for diaz cause he keeps his hands up & close; and he throws a lot of punches.. Obviously Diaz is an offensive fighter, that doesn't mean he can't have decent "d" also he is very accurate when he puts his combinations together. All this being said, congrats on this win and to those who went for jmm. The mission here is to make the right call & to make $$$ and get the best possible insite from people. Not used for a spelling contest!! But much props to you "nuttybuddy" let's continue to make the right choice!! 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Yes "nuttyrich" i meant (decent) defense for diaz cause he keeps his hands up & close; and he throws a lot of punches.. Obviously Diaz is an offensive fighter, that doesn't mean he can't have decent "d" also he is very accurate when he puts his combinations together. All this being said, congrats on this win and to those who went for jmm. The mission here is to make the right call & to make $$$ and get the best possible insite from people. Not used for a spelling contest!! But much props to you "nuttybuddy" let's continue to make the right choice!! 
     
    ghostkid
    ghostkid
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 643
    Posted: Mar. 1, 2009 - 2:57 AM ET #55

    if you think that fight was a mismatch or either guy was punked you are out of your damn mind

    GREAT GREAT give and take battle
    props to both guys....epic stuff
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    if you think that fight was a mismatch or either guy was punked you are out of your damn mind

    GREAT GREAT give and take battle
    props to both guys....epic stuff
     
    Redlad
    Redlad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2001
    Posts: 6822
    Posted: Mar. 1, 2009 - 5:35 AM ET #56

    Diaz showed a lot of guts. We should give him some credit for that. The fight was close before the KO so I don't think you would call that a mis-match. As long as Diaz was able to keep the fight on the inside he did very well IMO. Once there was more distance & Marquez was able to have the room to punch, the tide turned very quickly. Marquez learned how to roll off of the ropes after about the 3rd round & keep the fight more in the center of the ring. It was beautiful to observe the subtle change in his strategy. Bottom line is that in the end.... " The better man won". Cream rises to the top even in boxing (most of the time). We can praise Marquez but let's not disrespect Diaz's effort & heart. Now the "Baby Bull" should think about his career as a lawyer. His time as a "world class" fighter are probably over.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Diaz showed a lot of guts. We should give him some credit for that. The fight was close before the KO so I don't think you would call that a mis-match. As long as Diaz was able to keep the fight on the inside he did very well IMO. Once there was more distance & Marquez was able to have the room to punch, the tide turned very quickly. Marquez learned how to roll off of the ropes after about the 3rd round & keep the fight more in the center of the ring. It was beautiful to observe the subtle change in his strategy. Bottom line is that in the end.... " The better man won". Cream rises to the top even in boxing (most of the time). We can praise Marquez but let's not disrespect Diaz's effort & heart. Now the "Baby Bull" should think about his career as a lawyer. His time as a "world class" fighter are probably over.
     
    Zumbize
    Zumbize
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 668
    Posted: Mar. 1, 2009 - 11:16 AM ET #57

    Props on the under walk, you were all over that one. I chalked it up to Casa being way past prime, but Marquez has genuine pop at 135.

    Didn't see the fight, can't wait to watch a replay/ download.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Props on the under walk, you were all over that one. I chalked it up to Casa being way past prime, but Marquez has genuine pop at 135.

    Didn't see the fight, can't wait to watch a replay/ download.


     
    FrankieNapp
    FrankieNapp
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 5238
    Posted: Mar. 1, 2009 - 5:16 PM ET #58

    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    It's NOT non sense, if you MUTED the TV and just watched the fight not hearing the crowd oooh and ahhh on every punch, remember Marquez was allowing him to give the illusion he was landing heavier punches than what he actually was. Marquez landed the CLEANER Crisper shots the WHOLE fight. Marquez still fought a bad fight he could of won even more lopsided, but he's chasing a ghost called Pacman who has moved on to bigger and MORE Profitable things. Why would Pacman fight a third war with JMM when he can fight the likes of a washed up De la Hoya for mega paydays and a big paday for beating a "decent" Ricky Hatton.

    Give credit to Hatton he tasted 147 and was smart enough and honest enough to say "I don't have the power at 147" and dropped back down to 140.

    Marquez needs to drop down a weight  class and fight whatever is there, any other fighter at this weight tonight with a punch would of HURT HIM as JMM's chin is not "STRONG" he just had the perfect guy in front of him who couldn't hurt him. I know moving up in weight class means BIGGER paydays, but tonight showed Marquez is not strong at this weight and needs to drop back down otherwise he will be a stepping stone himself. Again he needs to give up the idea of fighting Pacman that's over, and throwing Mayweather's name is a bit odd being Mayweather is in retirement and would destroy Marquez.
    Either way was an amazing fight for the fight fans, hope everyone enjoyed it!

     

    Diaz had Marquez in the corner the entire fight. He was the effective aggressor. I wasn't concerned with the crowds OOOHS and AHHHS.  Marquez was an effective counter puncher. The fight was close. Although, I did have Diaz ahead before the final round. To have Marquez ahead 2 rounds was NONSENSE. I stand by it. Regardless of "the crowd."

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    It's NOT non sense, if you MUTED the TV and just watched the fight not hearing the crowd oooh and ahhh on every punch, remember Marquez was allowing him to give the illusion he was landing heavier punches than what he actually was. Marquez landed the CLEANER Crisper shots the WHOLE fight. Marquez still fought a bad fight he could of won even more lopsided, but he's chasing a ghost called Pacman who has moved on to bigger and MORE Profitable things. Why would Pacman fight a third war with JMM when he can fight the likes of a washed up De la Hoya for mega paydays and a big paday for beating a "decent" Ricky Hatton.

    Give credit to Hatton he tasted 147 and was smart enough and honest enough to say "I don't have the power at 147" and dropped back down to 140.

    Marquez needs to drop down a weight  class and fight whatever is there, any other fighter at this weight tonight with a punch would of HURT HIM as JMM's chin is not "STRONG" he just had the perfect guy in front of him who couldn't hurt him. I know moving up in weight class means BIGGER paydays, but tonight showed Marquez is not strong at this weight and needs to drop back down otherwise he will be a stepping stone himself. Again he needs to give up the idea of fighting Pacman that's over, and throwing Mayweather's name is a bit odd being Mayweather is in retirement and would destroy Marquez.
    Either way was an amazing fight for the fight fans, hope everyone enjoyed it!

     

    Diaz had Marquez in the corner the entire fight. He was the effective aggressor. I wasn't concerned with the crowds OOOHS and AHHHS.  Marquez was an effective counter puncher. The fight was close. Although, I did have Diaz ahead before the final round. To have Marquez ahead 2 rounds was NONSENSE. I stand by it. Regardless of "the crowd."

     
    nc1capper
    nc1capper
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 16348
    Posted: Mar. 1, 2009 - 11:01 PM ET #59

    seems like the flow of blood turns the baby bull into something else,,postfight he said there were some vision issues, perhaps between the ears as well- gutsy effort by rocky in the opener
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    seems like the flow of blood turns the baby bull into something else,,postfight he said there were some vision issues, perhaps between the ears as well- gutsy effort by rocky in the opener
     
    nc1capper
    nc1capper
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 16348
    Posted: Mar. 1, 2009 - 11:04 PM ET #60

    danno - dont ever second guess yourself as a gambler - win some , lose some, but NEVER second guess
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    danno - dont ever second guess yourself as a gambler - win some , lose some, but NEVER second guess
     
    NJDevils
    NJDevils
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2004
    Posts: 33122
    Posted: Mar. 2, 2009 - 12:46 AM ET #61

    Those were 2 good fights...1 good 1 great actually

    I thought the 1st one was a draw, no arguments here

    I had Diaz up in the 2nd bout maybe 5-3 ,  it could have been 4-4, but it reminded me  sort of like Meldrick Taylor vs Chavez or even Cotto -Margarito, where the one guy was winning more rounds but the other guy was dishing out a lot of punishment.
    Marquez is unreal though. The way he turns it on and just gets the KO like he did vs Casamayor and vs Diaz.

    great fight


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Those were 2 good fights...1 good 1 great actually

    I thought the 1st one was a draw, no arguments here

    I had Diaz up in the 2nd bout maybe 5-3 ,  it could have been 4-4, but it reminded me  sort of like Meldrick Taylor vs Chavez or even Cotto -Margarito, where the one guy was winning more rounds but the other guy was dishing out a lot of punishment.
    Marquez is unreal though. The way he turns it on and just gets the KO like he did vs Casamayor and vs Diaz.

    great fight


     
    DannoDanger
    DannoDanger
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 3554
    Posted: Mar. 2, 2009 - 8:24 AM ET #62

    Quote Originally Posted by nc1capper:

    danno - dont ever second guess yourself as a gambler - win some , lose some, but NEVER second guess

     

    JMM is the P4P best right now, IMO.  I thought he won the first fight with Pacquiao (after that horrible first, I thought he won every round), and his recent resume is more impressive than Manny's.  Betting against him was foolish, especially only getting +135.  Looking back, Diaz should've been a higher price than that.  I'm not second guessing myself, so much as I'm learning from my mistake. 

     

    Also, everyone I was watching the fight with knew that Diaz was in trouble early on.  In the second round, he caught JMM with a left hook that wobbled him, but after that Marquez dominated the last minute of the round with body shots.  Diaz was throwing more, but when Marquez was setting his feet and sitting down on his shots, he was affecting Diaz with every punch.  I only noticed two punches from Diaz where JMM looked bothered, the afformentioned hook to the head, and a hard hook to the body somewhere later.  On the other hand, JMM was landing shots all night that stopped Diaz in his tracks and obviously had an effect on him.  As a Diaz backer, I was worried by the third round. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nc1capper:

    danno - dont ever second guess yourself as a gambler - win some , lose some, but NEVER second guess

     

    JMM is the P4P best right now, IMO.  I thought he won the first fight with Pacquiao (after that horrible first, I thought he won every round), and his recent resume is more impressive than Manny's.  Betting against him was foolish, especially only getting +135.  Looking back, Diaz should've been a higher price than that.  I'm not second guessing myself, so much as I'm learning from my mistake. 

     

    Also, everyone I was watching the fight with knew that Diaz was in trouble early on.  In the second round, he caught JMM with a left hook that wobbled him, but after that Marquez dominated the last minute of the round with body shots.  Diaz was throwing more, but when Marquez was setting his feet and sitting down on his shots, he was affecting Diaz with every punch.  I only noticed two punches from Diaz where JMM looked bothered, the afformentioned hook to the head, and a hard hook to the body somewhere later.  On the other hand, JMM was landing shots all night that stopped Diaz in his tracks and obviously had an effect on him.  As a Diaz backer, I was worried by the third round. 

     
    nc1capper
    nc1capper
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 16348
    Posted: Mar. 2, 2009 - 8:01 PM ET #63

    understood danno,,and well stated might I add, was very impressed with JMM and can understand your thoughts on learning from ones mistakes, sorry if I appeared to be lecturing, just a crusty old veteran here enduring a bit of a hiccup over on the hardwoods- gonna roll up the sleeves and get back to work, the grind continues
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    understood danno,,and well stated might I add, was very impressed with JMM and can understand your thoughts on learning from ones mistakes, sorry if I appeared to be lecturing, just a crusty old veteran here enduring a bit of a hiccup over on the hardwoods- gonna roll up the sleeves and get back to work, the grind continues
     
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Mar. 3, 2009 - 12:55 PM ET #64

    Quote Originally Posted by frankoo1976:

    Yes "nuttyrich" i meant (decent) defense for diaz cause he keeps his hands up & close; and he throws a lot of punches.. Obviously Diaz is an offensive fighter, that doesn't mean he can't have decent "d" also he is very accurate when he puts his combinations together. All this being said, congrats on this win and to those who went for jmm. The mission here is to make the right call & to make $$$ and get the best possible insite from people. Not used for a spelling contest!! But much props to you "nuttybuddy" let's continue to make the right choice!! 


    Oh I wasn't making fun of your spelling or grammar.. I found it shocking you truly think Diaz has a defense. Throwing 100 punches a round is not a real defense, it will always get exposed by
     technical fighters. Defense wins championships, in every sport. Everyone knew that was Diaz's worst flaw (no defense).

    I agree it was a great fight, and for Diaz he's young he really didn't take "true beatings", he got beat to the body not the head. If he can find fighters who fight his style, he can make some money. just not TECHNICAL fighters.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by frankoo1976:

    Yes "nuttyrich" i meant (decent) defense for diaz cause he keeps his hands up & close; and he throws a lot of punches.. Obviously Diaz is an offensive fighter, that doesn't mean he can't have decent "d" also he is very accurate when he puts his combinations together. All this being said, congrats on this win and to those who went for jmm. The mission here is to make the right call & to make $$$ and get the best possible insite from people. Not used for a spelling contest!! But much props to you "nuttybuddy" let's continue to make the right choice!! 


    Oh I wasn't making fun of your spelling or grammar.. I found it shocking you truly think Diaz has a defense. Throwing 100 punches a round is not a real defense, it will always get exposed by
     technical fighters. Defense wins championships, in every sport. Everyone knew that was Diaz's worst flaw (no defense).

    I agree it was a great fight, and for Diaz he's young he really didn't take "true beatings", he got beat to the body not the head. If he can find fighters who fight his style, he can make some money. just not TECHNICAL fighters.


    All Forums | Boxing
    «First Previous 123

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,280 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 259,582 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,160 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 323 Covers arrow
    • Saturday 09/19/2026 660 Covers arrow
    • Flawed Logic & Bad Decisions: CFB Edition 2,794 Covers arrow
    • The Three-Day Money Train 5,783 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 98,124 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 23,260 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,522 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.