All plays and units wagered posted 2006 Results (March-July): +19.2 units (+$1,920)
Last Week: +4.11 units
2007 to date: +18.02 units (+$1,802)
What a boring weekend, there will not even be any lined fights happening Saturday night. Things will get back to normal next week. I guess watching college football will have to suffice.
Only down on one play as of now, still waiting for 5dimes to open up all of their odds. I am also looking at playing Witter by decision, TheGreek has it at +110, but I will wait to see if 5dimes opens up outcomes on the fight.
.40 of a unit on Simpson (+360) vs Morris
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
All plays and units wagered posted 2006 Results (March-July): +19.2 units (+$1,920)
Last Week: +4.11 units
2007 to date: +18.02 units (+$1,802)
What a boring weekend, there will not even be any lined fights happening Saturday night. Things will get back to normal next week. I guess watching college football will have to suffice.
Only down on one play as of now, still waiting for 5dimes to open up all of their odds. I am also looking at playing Witter by decision, TheGreek has it at +110, but I will wait to see if 5dimes opens up outcomes on the fight.
Zab -5000, Lamont Peterson-2500, Nick Casal -220 and Alfredo Angulo -190.
I like the Judah fight under 4 1/2 rounds at -230,but at that juice I will probably parlay it with Peterson to win so I have something to watch
Yeah, they didn't have them up last night when I made the post, they also have the two Telefutura fights lined.
I ended up taking Witter by decision at TheGreek, I was surprised that 5dimes didn't open up outcomes for that fight. Other than that I am done for the week. Big chalk and unknown fighters round out the rest of the card tonight, just not much out there.
1 unit on Witter by decision (+110)
0
Quote Originally Posted by LRM704:
Fullbrights, 5Dimes has lines on 4 fights tonight
Zab -5000, Lamont Peterson-2500, Nick Casal -220 and Alfredo Angulo -190.
I like the Judah fight under 4 1/2 rounds at -230,but at that juice I will probably parlay it with Peterson to win so I have something to watch
Yeah, they didn't have them up last night when I made the post, they also have the two Telefutura fights lined.
I ended up taking Witter by decision at TheGreek, I was surprised that 5dimes didn't open up outcomes for that fight. Other than that I am done for the week. Big chalk and unknown fighters round out the rest of the card tonight, just not much out there.
.40 of a unit on Simpson (+360) vs Morris 1 unit on Witter by decision (+110)
It feels weird that it is 7:30 eastern on a Friday and I am done betting for the weekend playing only 2 fights. Another solid upset winner with Simpson. I like Witter to win handily on points, but I never expected him to dominate in the fashion that he did. A definite statement by Witter to the rest of the division.
Won .44 of a unit for the week.
0
.40 of a unit on Simpson (+360) vs Morris 1 unit on Witter by decision (+110)
It feels weird that it is 7:30 eastern on a Friday and I am done betting for the weekend playing only 2 fights. Another solid upset winner with Simpson. I like Witter to win handily on points, but I never expected him to dominate in the fashion that he did. A definite statement by Witter to the rest of the division.
I am not very high on Casal after seeing him in his last Shobox
appearance, a loss as sizable favorite, but I don't know much about the
other guy.
I would not recommend laying the chalk on Casal especially with the
height disadvantage he will have. There will be much better
opportunities down the road than Casal tonight.
0
I am not very high on Casal after seeing him in his last Shobox
appearance, a loss as sizable favorite, but I don't know much about the
other guy.
I would not recommend laying the chalk on Casal especially with the
height disadvantage he will have. There will be much better
opportunities down the road than Casal tonight.
Great last round in the Casal fight. Hope you saw my post and saved
your money, good to see the judges make the right decision. I like
what I saw from De Marco, similar fighting style to Armando Santa Cruz,
very rangy and quick handed.
0
Great last round in the Casal fight. Hope you saw my post and saved
your money, good to see the judges make the right decision. I like
what I saw from De Marco, similar fighting style to Armando Santa Cruz,
very rangy and quick handed.
Won all of my bets yesterday. Ended up hedging the Judah under and Casal over De Marco to even. And luckily I did, both those bets would of lost.
I need to gain some balls. If I had added 0's to my bets over the last month I'd be +$10,000. But after seeing Gonzalez vs. Penalosa when I ALMOST put 5k to hedge my 1500 on bautista...I'm going to take the slow/medium road.
0
Swept em yesterday!
Won all of my bets yesterday. Ended up hedging the Judah under and Casal over De Marco to even. And luckily I did, both those bets would of lost.
I need to gain some balls. If I had added 0's to my bets over the last month I'd be +$10,000. But after seeing Gonzalez vs. Penalosa when I ALMOST put 5k to hedge my 1500 on bautista...I'm going to take the slow/medium road.
Everything won. & how about the scorecard of 3 throat slashes to 1 up-your's! I guess Zab did really hurt his mit, as he was much less offense orriented the closing rounds.
Lamont looked bigger to me, more cut up, 'spically in the back. But I still don't quite know what he & his bro' really are, as neither one has really been hard pressed. But they are winning, & improving, & that's all they can do.
Stoppages on the other 2 fights for me, I like that.
bigeiii
0
Everything won. & how about the scorecard of 3 throat slashes to 1 up-your's! I guess Zab did really hurt his mit, as he was much less offense orriented the closing rounds.
Lamont looked bigger to me, more cut up, 'spically in the back. But I still don't quite know what he & his bro' really are, as neither one has really been hard pressed. But they are winning, & improving, & that's all they can do.
Stoppages on the other 2 fights for me, I like that.
Won all of my bets yesterday. Ended up hedging the Judah under and Casal over De Marco to even. And luckily I did, both those bets would of lost.
I need to gain some balls. If I had added 0's to my bets over the last month I'd be +$10,000. But after seeing Gonzalez vs. Penalosa when I ALMOST put 5k to hedge my 1500 on bautista...I'm going to take the slow/medium road.
I love when people come in after the fact from losing nights and claim
miraculous hedges. If you lose you lose, at least last week when you
lost you only claimed BS instead of some lame hedge story.
And why would you have put $5,000 on Gonzo-Penalosa to hedge a $1500 bet on Bautista? That wouldn't even be a hedge.
0
Quote Originally Posted by snippets69:
Swept em yesterday!
Won all of my bets yesterday. Ended up hedging the Judah under and Casal over De Marco to even. And luckily I did, both those bets would of lost.
I need to gain some balls. If I had added 0's to my bets over the last month I'd be +$10,000. But after seeing Gonzalez vs. Penalosa when I ALMOST put 5k to hedge my 1500 on bautista...I'm going to take the slow/medium road.
I love when people come in after the fact from losing nights and claim
miraculous hedges. If you lose you lose, at least last week when you
lost you only claimed BS instead of some lame hedge story.
And why would you have put $5,000 on Gonzo-Penalosa to hedge a $1500 bet on Bautista? That wouldn't even be a hedge.
Laughin.... Think what you want. Truth is, I washed both those bets and actually came out $30 ahead because everything was parlayed with Federer. Who won today. Nice.
Gonzo - Because I thought it was a sure bet and was unsure about Bautista. It wasn't that Penalosa won. It was how it happened. With Gonzalez dominating the whole fight. It's funny how surprised even Penelosa was. He could barely believe it.
0
Laughin.... Think what you want. Truth is, I washed both those bets and actually came out $30 ahead because everything was parlayed with Federer. Who won today. Nice.
Gonzo - Because I thought it was a sure bet and was unsure about Bautista. It wasn't that Penalosa won. It was how it happened. With Gonzalez dominating the whole fight. It's funny how surprised even Penelosa was. He could barely believe it.
Laughin.... Think what you want. Truth is, I washed both those bets and actually came out $30 ahead because everything was parlayed with Federer. Who won today. Nice.
Gonzo - Because I thought it was a sure bet and was unsure about Bautista. It wasn't that Penalosa won. It was how it happened. With Gonzalez dominating the whole fight. It's funny how surprised even Penelosa was. He could barely believe it.
I know that you parlayed them with Federer, you tried to post your betting ticket which had win amounts on it and it messed up spacing in the thread yesterday. I got them to take it out last night, because you couldn't read other posts.
You came out down just over a C-note according to the math that I learned in elementary school. All you have to do is go back and check the parlay odds. $250 in losses on Casal and the Judah under then your other three chalk winners with Federer -1100 added up to right at $150.
I love when people try to claim winning nights or clean sweeps when they actually lost for all to see. Losers love to pad their imaginary bankroll.
By the way, that is not an example of a hedge.
0
Quote Originally Posted by snippets69:
Laughin.... Think what you want. Truth is, I washed both those bets and actually came out $30 ahead because everything was parlayed with Federer. Who won today. Nice.
Gonzo - Because I thought it was a sure bet and was unsure about Bautista. It wasn't that Penalosa won. It was how it happened. With Gonzalez dominating the whole fight. It's funny how surprised even Penelosa was. He could barely believe it.
I know that you parlayed them with Federer, you tried to post your betting ticket which had win amounts on it and it messed up spacing in the thread yesterday. I got them to take it out last night, because you couldn't read other posts.
You came out down just over a C-note according to the math that I learned in elementary school. All you have to do is go back and check the parlay odds. $250 in losses on Casal and the Judah under then your other three chalk winners with Federer -1100 added up to right at $150.
I love when people try to claim winning nights or clean sweeps when they actually lost for all to see. Losers love to pad their imaginary bankroll.
If you really need to see to believe.. I can post a couple screenshots. Believe what you want.
When parlayed with Federer at -1100, both the De Marco and the over with Judah washed the original bets and put me at approx. +$30 . If you're that bored...Do the math again because you're wrong.
0
If you really need to see to believe.. I can post a couple screenshots. Believe what you want.
When parlayed with Federer at -1100, both the De Marco and the over with Judah washed the original bets and put me at approx. +$30 . If you're that bored...Do the math again because you're wrong.
If you really need to see to believe.. I can post a couple screenshots. Believe what you want.
When parlayed with Federer at -1100, both the De Marco and the over with Judah washed the original bets and put me at approx. +$30 . If you're that bored...Do the math again because you're wrong.
LOL, you never mentioned De-Marco and the over in the Judah fight
yesterday. That's what I'm saying you posted a clean sweep, but in
reality you lost money with the parlays you posted. Hedges are easy
covers for losing nights when mentioned the next day. It is easy to
post clean sweep winning nights when you make up stuff after the fact.
That Penalosa/Gonzo and Bautista example is not even close to what the definition of a hedge is.
0
Quote Originally Posted by snippets69:
If you really need to see to believe.. I can post a couple screenshots. Believe what you want.
When parlayed with Federer at -1100, both the De Marco and the over with Judah washed the original bets and put me at approx. +$30 . If you're that bored...Do the math again because you're wrong.
LOL, you never mentioned De-Marco and the over in the Judah fight
yesterday. That's what I'm saying you posted a clean sweep, but in
reality you lost money with the parlays you posted. Hedges are easy
covers for losing nights when mentioned the next day. It is easy to
post clean sweep winning nights when you make up stuff after the fact.
That Penalosa/Gonzo and Bautista example is not even close to what the definition of a hedge is.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.