Look...don't be scared Fullbright. It's ok to be wrong once in a while.
Why in the world would I ever be scared to look at a screen shot? Looks good.
When you post plays in a forum you can only go by one thing.... what you actually post before an event takes place, it's plain and simple. That's why there is no edit button on this forum.
Take this scenario for example: Say you won your original Casal bet along with the original Judah under. Do you ever mention that you laid money opposite those sides to hedge? I make "no" a 20-1 favorite.
Another scenario: A poster loses 3 fights that they posted in a thread, they actually played 2 others. If those 2 off the record win they probably come back and say they won on those, if those two off the record lose they are never mentioned.
0
Quote Originally Posted by snippets69:
Look...don't be scared Fullbright. It's ok to be wrong once in a while.
Why in the world would I ever be scared to look at a screen shot? Looks good.
When you post plays in a forum you can only go by one thing.... what you actually post before an event takes place, it's plain and simple. That's why there is no edit button on this forum.
Take this scenario for example: Say you won your original Casal bet along with the original Judah under. Do you ever mention that you laid money opposite those sides to hedge? I make "no" a 20-1 favorite.
Another scenario: A poster loses 3 fights that they posted in a thread, they actually played 2 others. If those 2 off the record win they probably come back and say they won on those, if those two off the record lose they are never mentioned.
I don't know what to tell you Fullbright. The only thing I did wrong here was not post my hedge. But I'm not lying. I read 2 handicappers not sure about the under for Judah and picking De Marco as a live dog, so I hedged them out and ended up with +30 when the original bets lost.
0
I don't know what to tell you Fullbright. The only thing I did wrong here was not post my hedge. But I'm not lying. I read 2 handicappers not sure about the under for Judah and picking De Marco as a live dog, so I hedged them out and ended up with +30 when the original bets lost.
I don't know what to tell you Fullbright. The only thing I did wrong here was not post my hedge. But I'm not lying. I read 2 handicappers not sure about the under for Judah and picking De Marco as a live dog, so I hedged them out and ended up with +30 when the original bets lost.
You don't have to tell me anything. That's just the way it is if you want to claim a legitimate posting record or winning day.
Do you see how this scenario plays out? Say you won your original Casal bet
along with the original Judah under. Do you ever mention that you laid
money opposite those sides to hedge? I make "no" a 20-1 favorite.
Nothing against you, but I take the "No"proposition all day long and I don't ever play chalk.
0
Quote Originally Posted by snippets69:
I don't know what to tell you Fullbright. The only thing I did wrong here was not post my hedge. But I'm not lying. I read 2 handicappers not sure about the under for Judah and picking De Marco as a live dog, so I hedged them out and ended up with +30 when the original bets lost.
You don't have to tell me anything. That's just the way it is if you want to claim a legitimate posting record or winning day.
Do you see how this scenario plays out? Say you won your original Casal bet
along with the original Judah under. Do you ever mention that you laid
money opposite those sides to hedge? I make "no" a 20-1 favorite.
Nothing against you, but I take the "No"proposition all day long and I don't ever play chalk.
Did you understand what I was saying on how betting on Gonzo vs
Penalosa in order to hedge a Bautista bet against De Leon is not a
hedge at all?
They are two individual fights with no connection whatsoever. So how
could you hedge a $1500 bet on Bautista with a $5,000 bet on Gonzalez?
They have no connection, so it isn't a hedge.
Hope you don't think I was busting your balls too much, but I am a big believer in legitimate plays and winners. If you try to claim winners and records that were never posted than a poster is no better than a tout who changes his record as he pleases.
The bottom line is across the board these various forums are filled with a lot of losing bettors, I would say 90-95% of bettors on the board. Not many can document/post plays with units played and prove to be consistent winners. Lots of people on the other hand can claim to be winners with no documentation.
0
Did you understand what I was saying on how betting on Gonzo vs
Penalosa in order to hedge a Bautista bet against De Leon is not a
hedge at all?
They are two individual fights with no connection whatsoever. So how
could you hedge a $1500 bet on Bautista with a $5,000 bet on Gonzalez?
They have no connection, so it isn't a hedge.
Hope you don't think I was busting your balls too much, but I am a big believer in legitimate plays and winners. If you try to claim winners and records that were never posted than a poster is no better than a tout who changes his record as he pleases.
The bottom line is across the board these various forums are filled with a lot of losing bettors, I would say 90-95% of bettors on the board. Not many can document/post plays with units played and prove to be consistent winners. Lots of people on the other hand can claim to be winners with no documentation.
Did either one of you bet the other a single copper penny? IF "no", why not leave all of this cyber pollution off of covers.com. Fbs is quality. snippets69, you read like you know a bit of Boxing, if you are that good, time will show that. Just hang tight, do a good job, & props will come your way.
Remember, it takes 2 hands to clap.
bigeiii
0
Did either one of you bet the other a single copper penny? IF "no", why not leave all of this cyber pollution off of covers.com. Fbs is quality. snippets69, you read like you know a bit of Boxing, if you are that good, time will show that. Just hang tight, do a good job, & props will come your way.
Did either one of you bet the other a single copper penny? IF "no", why not leave all of this cyber pollution off of covers.com. Fbs is quality. snippets69, you read like you know a bit of Boxing, if you are that good, time will show that. Just hang tight, do a good job, & props will come your way.
Remember, it takes 2 hands to clap.
bigeiii
Bigeiii, I didn't know that you were part of the discussion.
It's a forum, you discuss things and make points, that's how it works.
I know when to call a spade a spade and that's all I was doing.
Tough game for your boys last night, they got it handed to them. LSU looked like the complete package last night.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigeiii:
Did either one of you bet the other a single copper penny? IF "no", why not leave all of this cyber pollution off of covers.com. Fbs is quality. snippets69, you read like you know a bit of Boxing, if you are that good, time will show that. Just hang tight, do a good job, & props will come your way.
Remember, it takes 2 hands to clap.
bigeiii
Bigeiii, I didn't know that you were part of the discussion.
It's a forum, you discuss things and make points, that's how it works.
I know when to call a spade a spade and that's all I was doing.
Tough game for your boys last night, they got it handed to them. LSU looked like the complete package last night.
Nothing at all. I don't make posts to gain anything, I do that with my
bets. I do though call BS when I see it, call it a principle that my
parents placed in me.
One of the most entertaining things I have experienced from my time
betting and on this forum is the mentality and antics of bettors to try
and pull the wool over peoples eyes in order to mask losing. The fact
is there are very few consistent winning bettors, most bettors are
losers and don't like to admit it. Also, few are willing to go on the
record with their exact plays including units because they know then
that their losing will be documented in black and white. Newbie A2C
gets my respect for doing it right. I have great respect for posters
that prove to be winners, it's hard to do. This forum has some great
ones in all of the various sports who document their plays and
consistently win.
You have this mentality also to an extent. I am not one to say if you
are winning or losing bettor, because it is impossible to say with your
posting style and chalky multi-sport parlays. You always somehow win
when you lose and never admit a loss. The perfect example was earlier
this year in the Miranda fight, you talked for a couple of weeks about
how you had a lot riding on Miranda, but then went ghost when he lost
only to reappear and talk about how you hedged and had a great weekend
with your parlays.
If people are going to claim to be winning bettors and try to convince
others about that fact then they only have to do one thing, prove it in
black and white.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigeiii:
& you gain what by calling this poster out?
bigeiii
Nothing at all. I don't make posts to gain anything, I do that with my
bets. I do though call BS when I see it, call it a principle that my
parents placed in me.
One of the most entertaining things I have experienced from my time
betting and on this forum is the mentality and antics of bettors to try
and pull the wool over peoples eyes in order to mask losing. The fact
is there are very few consistent winning bettors, most bettors are
losers and don't like to admit it. Also, few are willing to go on the
record with their exact plays including units because they know then
that their losing will be documented in black and white. Newbie A2C
gets my respect for doing it right. I have great respect for posters
that prove to be winners, it's hard to do. This forum has some great
ones in all of the various sports who document their plays and
consistently win.
You have this mentality also to an extent. I am not one to say if you
are winning or losing bettor, because it is impossible to say with your
posting style and chalky multi-sport parlays. You always somehow win
when you lose and never admit a loss. The perfect example was earlier
this year in the Miranda fight, you talked for a couple of weeks about
how you had a lot riding on Miranda, but then went ghost when he lost
only to reappear and talk about how you hedged and had a great weekend
with your parlays.
If people are going to claim to be winning bettors and try to convince
others about that fact then they only have to do one thing, prove it in
black and white.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
