The one obvious discrepancy of mine/theirs is the total between the Lions and the Alouettes. I'm not convinced that the defense of the Alouettes is ready for prime time.
Here's a couple of queries for those two games.
tA(YPPA-o:YPPA)-oA(YPPA-o:YPPA)>0 and H and not DIV and tA(W)>.5
a team with the yards/pass attempt advantage at home in a non-divisional game with a winning percentage of >50% has been 47-64 ATS, 3-6 ATS as a home dog, AGAINST the Tiger Cats
Then, we'll change a few parameters, making home non-divisional dog having their opponent have the passing yards/attempt differential advantage and being <50% winning percentage......voila! those teams have been 44-31 ATS.....indicating a possible play ON the Alouettes.
0
Two of the lines are up.
Mine in brackets.
Alouettes +3 (+3') Lions 50 (54)
Tiger Cats +1' (+2') Stamps 52 (52)
The one obvious discrepancy of mine/theirs is the total between the Lions and the Alouettes. I'm not convinced that the defense of the Alouettes is ready for prime time.
Here's a couple of queries for those two games.
tA(YPPA-o:YPPA)-oA(YPPA-o:YPPA)>0 and H and not DIV and tA(W)>.5
a team with the yards/pass attempt advantage at home in a non-divisional game with a winning percentage of >50% has been 47-64 ATS, 3-6 ATS as a home dog, AGAINST the Tiger Cats
Then, we'll change a few parameters, making home non-divisional dog having their opponent have the passing yards/attempt differential advantage and being <50% winning percentage......voila! those teams have been 44-31 ATS.....indicating a possible play ON the Alouettes.
A non-divisional away favorite that has won less games out of their last three than their opponent has been only 3-6 ATS....versus the Stampeders and the Lions.
tS(W, N=3)<oS(W, N=3) and AF and not DIV
A non-divisional away favorite that has a winnng percentage of <50% has been 8-13 ATS, VERSUS Lions
tA(W)<.5 and AF and not DIV
A non-divisional away favorite that has a winning percentage of >50% has been 39-47 ATS, though these teams have been only been 4-13 ATS in September games, going 5-12 straight up in the process. VERSUS the Stampeders
tA(W)>.5 and AF and not DIV and month
0
A non-divisional away favorite that has won less games out of their last three than their opponent has been only 3-6 ATS....versus the Stampeders and the Lions.
tS(W, N=3)<oS(W, N=3) and AF and not DIV
A non-divisional away favorite that has a winnng percentage of <50% has been 8-13 ATS, VERSUS Lions
tA(W)<.5 and AF and not DIV
A non-divisional away favorite that has a winning percentage of >50% has been 39-47 ATS, though these teams have been only been 4-13 ATS in September games, going 5-12 straight up in the process. VERSUS the Stampeders
Evidently, Travis Lulay is questionable versus the Alouettes due to a helmut to chin hit last week, my opinion of his back-up has not changed.....Jennings is an auto-fade if he gets the start,.....Alouettes will be my play of the year if Lulay is out.
And Winnipeg?
Just do it Bombers, your season is on life support and it's time to give Streveler his shot.
0
Evidently, Travis Lulay is questionable versus the Alouettes due to a helmut to chin hit last week, my opinion of his back-up has not changed.....Jennings is an auto-fade if he gets the start,.....Alouettes will be my play of the year if Lulay is out.
And Winnipeg?
Just do it Bombers, your season is on life support and it's time to give Streveler his shot.
Travis Lulay, according to the ever reliable Freaky Freddies is a go for this week's upcoming games. No game of the year then if he is playing.
I haven't liked the card either last week or this one either,.......why there's only three games on the schedule seems a bit weird.
I'll post my college and pro card here,...went a scintillating 7-10 on my picks last week....I'll try this one more time and if they lose again, that'll be it for my posting, and I'll surmise that I am hexing myself or some other unexplainable phenomena.
Pros:
1) Browns +8
2) Ravens pik
College
1) Hawaii +7
2) Troy +8' (very bad line, yes I know)
3) Rutgers +3
4) UCF -14'
5) Central Michigan +14
6) Texas San Antonio +21'
7) UMass +4
8) Miami, O +14
9) Houston +2
10) San Diego State +3'
11) Ohio State -12
12) North Texas +7'
0
Travis Lulay, according to the ever reliable Freaky Freddies is a go for this week's upcoming games. No game of the year then if he is playing.
I haven't liked the card either last week or this one either,.......why there's only three games on the schedule seems a bit weird.
I'll post my college and pro card here,...went a scintillating 7-10 on my picks last week....I'll try this one more time and if they lose again, that'll be it for my posting, and I'll surmise that I am hexing myself or some other unexplainable phenomena.
I also have a futures WNBA play on the Storm at +1767 that I bought after they killed the Los Angeles Sparks by 30 points on LA's home court a few months ago.
May hedge and take the Mystics moneyline for game 3.
0
I also have a futures WNBA play on the Storm at +1767 that I bought after they killed the Los Angeles Sparks by 30 points on LA's home court a few months ago.
May hedge and take the Mystics moneyline for game 3.
Non-divisional home dogs when their opponent's winning percentage is less than 50% are 13-8 ATS, 7-2 if their record is less than their present opponent (4-5 straight up).
Though I love Travis Lulay, the new Montreal quarterback is his equal.
Good fortune.
0
Play:
1) Alouettes +3', -115
Non-divisional home dogs when their opponent's winning percentage is less than 50% are 13-8 ATS, 7-2 if their record is less than their present opponent (4-5 straight up).
Though I love Travis Lulay, the new Montreal quarterback is his equal.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.