All Forums | College Basketball

🤢🥴_ Fubah's 2023 Hoops Thread _😲🥵

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 71411
Posts: 2485
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2023
Posts: 62
Posted: #2251

houston cougars

north carolina tarheals 

money line parlay!! peace_5

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2252

Quote Originally Posted by cd329:

@fubah2  Good luck today Got to ask you thou, are you calculating the moneyline plays into your record?  Cause if a person loses a minus 400 moneyline play, thats not 1 loss

@cd329

 Thanks! peace_5 And BoL with your bets today too!! clover an_dance

Your Q was answered in post #2247 on previous page

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1550
Posted: #2253

All, this dude is a loser. The odds he plays are way to large. Post record say 88 w - 35 L  Losses are -200 to 600 odds so do the math. an_light

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 14730
Posted: #2254

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

For example,
on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:
-110
-110
-130
-130
-210
-210
-215
-360
       ... against just 6 winners

Then, from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:
Merrimack +3.5 -115
Toledo -4.5 -120
Toledo -210
Dayton -140
        ... against 24 winners

So then it comes down to how one wishes to evaluate results.
In this particular small sample size, 12 losers totalling -2060 vs 30 winners.

 If we evaluate using the common
"Internet Fair Scoring Standard for Comparing Records"
(ie, as if every pick is scored as if to win one unit only - regardless the unit attachment "claimed")


then that 5-day result would be scored as +9.4 units.


Or +45.2 units if every pick is to win 5 units!
Or +90.4 units if every pick is to win 10 units!!! Pick your fancy! LOL

That's just on a 5 day stretch, which includes my worst day of March.

I do lose the occasional bet of -290 to -500, sure. Occasionally. But I win significantly more than lose in that range and show a profit.

My bets are all posted in this one thread if anyone wishes to check

.

good pts 

"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 14730
Posted: #2255

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

For example,
on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:
-110
-110
-130
-130
-210
-210
-215
-360
       ... against just 6 winners

Then, from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:
Merrimack +3.5 -115
Toledo -4.5 -120
Toledo -210
Dayton -140
        ... against 24 winners

So then it comes down to how one wishes to evaluate results.
In this particular small sample size, 12 losers totalling -2060 vs 30 winners.

 If we evaluate using the common
"Internet Fair Scoring Standard for Comparing Records"
(ie, as if every pick is scored as if to win one unit only - regardless the unit attachment "claimed")


then that 5-day result would be scored as +9.4 units.


Or +45.2 units if every pick is to win 5 units!
Or +90.4 units if every pick is to win 10 units!!! Pick your fancy! LOL

That's just on a 5 day stretch, which includes my worst day of March.

I do lose the occasional bet of -290 to -500, sure. Occasionally. But I win significantly more than lose in that range and show a profit.

My bets are all posted in this one thread if anyone wishes to check

.

good pts 

"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 14730
Posted: #2256

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

For example,
on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:
-110
-110
-130
-130
-210
-210
-215
-360
       ... against just 6 winners

Then, from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:
Merrimack +3.5 -115
Toledo -4.5 -120
Toledo -210
Dayton -140
        ... against 24 winners

So then it comes down to how one wishes to evaluate results.
In this particular small sample size, 12 losers totalling -2060 vs 30 winners.

 If we evaluate using the common
"Internet Fair Scoring Standard for Comparing Records"
(ie, as if every pick is scored as if to win one unit only - regardless the unit attachment "claimed")


then that 5-day result would be scored as +9.4 units.


Or +45.2 units if every pick is to win 5 units!
Or +90.4 units if every pick is to win 10 units!!! Pick your fancy! LOL

That's just on a 5 day stretch, which includes my worst day of March.

I do lose the occasional bet of -290 to -500, sure. Occasionally. But I win significantly more than lose in that range and show a profit.

My bets are all posted in this one thread if anyone wishes to check

.

good pts 

"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 14730
Posted: #2257

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

For example,
on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:
-110
-110
-130
-130
-210
-210
-215
-360
       ... against just 6 winners

Then, from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:
Merrimack +3.5 -115
Toledo -4.5 -120
Toledo -210
Dayton -140
        ... against 24 winners

So then it comes down to how one wishes to evaluate results.
In this particular small sample size, 12 losers totalling -2060 vs 30 winners.

 If we evaluate using the common
"Internet Fair Scoring Standard for Comparing Records"
(ie, as if every pick is scored as if to win one unit only - regardless the unit attachment "claimed")


then that 5-day result would be scored as +9.4 units.


Or +45.2 units if every pick is to win 5 units!
Or +90.4 units if every pick is to win 10 units!!! Pick your fancy! LOL

That's just on a 5 day stretch, which includes my worst day of March.

I do lose the occasional bet of -290 to -500, sure. Occasionally. But I win significantly more than lose in that range and show a profit.

My bets are all posted in this one thread if anyone wishes to check

.

good pts 

"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 14730
Posted: #2258

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

For example,
on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:
-110
-110
-130
-130
-210
-210
-215
-360
       ... against just 6 winners

Then, from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:
Merrimack +3.5 -115
Toledo -4.5 -120
Toledo -210
Dayton -140
        ... against 24 winners

So then it comes down to how one wishes to evaluate results.
In this particular small sample size, 12 losers totalling -2060 vs 30 winners.

 If we evaluate using the common
"Internet Fair Scoring Standard for Comparing Records"
(ie, as if every pick is scored as if to win one unit only - regardless the unit attachment "claimed")


then that 5-day result would be scored as +9.4 units.


Or +45.2 units if every pick is to win 5 units!
Or +90.4 units if every pick is to win 10 units!!! Pick your fancy! LOL

That's just on a 5 day stretch, which includes my worst day of March.

I do lose the occasional bet of -290 to -500, sure. Occasionally. But I win significantly more than lose in that range and show a profit.

My bets are all posted in this one thread if anyone wishes to check

.

good pts 

"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 14730
Posted: #2259

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

For example,
on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:
-110
-110
-130
-130
-210
-210
-215
-360
       ... against just 6 winners

Then, from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:
Merrimack +3.5 -115
Toledo -4.5 -120
Toledo -210
Dayton -140
        ... against 24 winners

So then it comes down to how one wishes to evaluate results.
In this particular small sample size, 12 losers totalling -2060 vs 30 winners.

 If we evaluate using the common
"Internet Fair Scoring Standard for Comparing Records"
(ie, as if every pick is scored as if to win one unit only - regardless the unit attachment "claimed")


then that 5-day result would be scored as +9.4 units.


Or +45.2 units if every pick is to win 5 units!
Or +90.4 units if every pick is to win 10 units!!! Pick your fancy! LOL

That's just on a 5 day stretch, which includes my worst day of March.

I do lose the occasional bet of -290 to -500, sure. Occasionally. But I win significantly more than lose in that range and show a profit.

My bets are all posted in this one thread if anyone wishes to check

.

good pts 

"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2260

Quote Originally Posted by Fuse:

GL today

Thanks Fuse!!!

 

 

 

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2261

Quote Originally Posted by Fuse:

GL today peaceclover

And BoL with your Colorado bet!  an_cheers

 

 

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2262

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: For example,on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:-110-110-130-130-210-210-215-360       ... against just 6 winners Then, from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:Merrimack +3.5 -115Toledo -4.5 -120Toledo -210Dayton -140        ... against 24 winners

So then it comes down to how one wishes to evaluate results.

In this particular small sample size, 12 losers totalling -2060 vs 30 winners.  

If we evaluate using the common

"Internet Fair Scoring Standard for Comparing Records"

(ie, as if every pick is scored as if to win one unit only - regardless the unit attachment "claimed") then that 5-day result would be scored as +9.4 units. Or +45.2 units if every pick is to win 5 units!Or +90.4 units if every pick is to win 10 units!!! Pick your fancy! LOL

That's just on a 5 day stretch, which includes my worst day of March.

I do lose the occasional bet of -290 to -500, sure. Occasionally. But I win significantly more than lose in that range and show a profit. My bets are all posted in this one thread if anyone wishes to check .

good pts

Thanks!

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2263

Gators beating up Bama an_speechless  After yesterday's performance I thought Florida had little chance today...

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2264

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Gators beating up Bama   After yesterday's performance I thought Florida had little chance today...
Gators put up 100 on Bama an_getaway

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 610
Posted: #2265

Joke thread

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2266

Quote Originally Posted by JDMsports2023:

houston cougars north carolina tarheals  money line parlay!!

@JDMsports2023

 Good call on your part! an_2drinks I don't do parlays myself but if it works for you then good on ya!

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2267

Quote Originally Posted by JDMsports2023:

houston cougars north carolina tarheals  money line parlay!!

@JDMsports2023

 Good call on your part! an_2drinks I don't do parlays myself but if it works for you then good on ya!

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2268

Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:

@fubah2  Good work to scramble back like that

Thank you. BoL with your bets too! clover

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2269

Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:

@fubah2  Good work to scramble back like that

Thank you. BoL with your bets too! clover

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2270

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by JDMsports2023: houston cougars north carolina tarheals  money line parlay!! @JDMsports2023  Good call on your part! I don't do parlays myself but if it works for you then good on ya!
Saturday, March 16: Catamounts -295

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2271

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by JDMsports2023: houston cougars north carolina tarheals  money line parlay!! @JDMsports2023  Good call on your part! I don't do parlays myself but if it works for you then good on ya!Saturday, March 16: Catamounts -295
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: For example,on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:-110-110-130-130-210-210-215-360       ... against just 6 winners Then, from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:Merrimack +3.5 -115Toledo -4.5 -120Toledo -210Dayton -140        ... against 24 winners So then it comes down to how one wishes to evaluate results. In this particular small sample size, 12 losers totalling -2060 vs 30 winners.   If we evaluate using the common "Internet Fair Scoring Standard for Comparing Records" (ie, as if every pick is scored as if to win one unit only - regardless the unit attachment "claimed") then that 5-day result would be scored as +9.4 units. Or +45.2 units if every pick is to win 5 units!Or +90.4 units if every pick is to win 10 units!!! Pick your fancy! LOL That's just on a 5 day stretch, which includes my worst day of March. I do lose the occasional bet of -290 to -500, sure. Occasionally. But I win significantly more than lose in that range and show a profit. My bets are all posted in this one thread if anyone wishes to check . good ptsThanks!
March 16 Bison -135

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2272

[Quote: Originally Posted by KellyM_1964]For example,
on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:
-110
-110
-130
-130
-210
-210
-215
-360
       ... against just 6 winners

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2273

[Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]For example,
on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:
-110
-110
-130
-130
-210
-210
-215
-360
       ... against just 6 winners

 

Then, from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:
Merrimack +3.5 -115
Toledo -4.5 -120
Toledo -210
Dayton -140
        ... against 24 winners

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2274

[Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]

from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:
Merrimack +3.5 -115
Toledo -4.5 -120
Toledo -210
Dayton -140
        ... against 24 winners

So then it comes down to how one wishes to evaluate results.
In this particular small sample size, 12 losers totalling -2060 vs 30 winners.

 If we evaluate using the common
"Internet Fair Scoring Standard for Comparing Records"
(ie, as if every pick is scored as if to win one unit only - regardless the unit attachment "claimed")


then that 5-day result would be scored as +9.4 units.


Or +45.2 units if every pick is to win 5 units!
Or +90.4 units if every pick is to win 10 units!!! 

cool Pick your fancy! LOL

That's just on a 5 day stretch, which includes my worst day of March.

I do lose the occasional bet of -290 to -500, sure. Occasionally. But I win significantly more than lose in that range and show a profit.

My bets are all posted in this one thread   ...March 16 VCU -140

 

 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31186
Posted: #2275

For example,
on REGRESSION SUNDAY my 8 posted losers were:
-110
-110
-130
-130
-210
-210
-215
-360
       ... against just 6 winners

 

Then, from Monday through Thursday, only 4 losers:
Merrimack +3.5 -115
Toledo -4.5 -120
Toledo -210
Dayton -140
        ... against 24 winners

So then it comes down to how one wishes to evaluate results.
In this particular small sample size, 12 losers totalling -2060 vs 30 winners.

 If we evaluate using the common
"Internet Fair Scoring Standard for Comparing Records"
(ie, as if every pick is scored as if to win one unit only - regardless the unit attachment "claimed")


then that 5-day result would be scored as +9.4 units.


Or +45.2 units if every pick is to win 5 units!
Or +90.4 units if every pick is to win 10 units!!! 

cool Pick your fancy! LOL

That's just on a 5 day stretch, which includes my worst day of March.

I do lose the occasional bet of -290 to -500, sure. Occasionally. But I win significantly more than lose in that range and show a profit.

My bets are all posted in this one thread if anyone wishes to check

All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.