Quote Originally Posted by Barnstorm:
2-2 on his posted plays. Then we think the late plays would have been Whisky 2H winner, Gunzaga 2H winner and E. Wash 2h Loser.
So that would be 4-3.
Let's see how it goes today.
Better, can anyone run a program and see how it has done in the past year(s). Might be hard to get all that 2H data.
Hey it if works, then a trend is a trend, whether it is based on uniform colors or this. But don't think that it works because "Vegas knows" the outcome.
GL
I ran out after I played Utah St, so it went 2-2 on my posted plays....
Wisconsin and Zags would have been winners as well if I played them so it went 4-2....
E Wash would not have fit the trend....The spread for the game was only 3.5, there is no way vegas would put out a line for a 4 point favorite to come back from down 12 at half....
This differs from the Marshall game. Marshall was a 8 point favorite down 9 at half. If the 2nd half was Marshall -8.5 or 9, meaning the line had them winning the game, Marshall would have been the play. But, since the 2nd half line had them losing the game, Ohio was the play.
Same reason I played Utah St which was way wrong. Utah St was the 6 point favorite before the game, and the 2nd half line had them coming back to WIN the game, therefore Utah St was my play which was way off.
Same with Penn St, Penn St 2nd half line had them coming back to win the game.
So, my posted playes were 2-2, but if I played all night would have went 4-2 after 6-0 last night.....
Its funny all the people coming on here bashing. This isnt some creative system I claim to have created, just something I have been noticing.
Even when you come on to covers, and try to point out something that has been winning more than it loses, people still arent happy 