Apparently some of you got confused on my last pick, i clearly said North Carolina -7.5, therefore i put the game number in this to want to be very clear. i never picked St. Joseph's
One poster in the last thread mentioned why not a brand name team, remote future viewers see these events in the future.the best with the most energy in the stadium these teams play at, i always played high to mid to low profile games in the time that i did bet back in the 60's and 00's, as long as it paid a profit, that's all that counted.
Now people will say why not just take the ML? like i said in the first post i am NOT the remote future viewer! what ever instructions i got back then i just did it, if they said pick Louisville - 2 i took it, never get greedy with this people. Simple, do what the instructions say.
Sorry if i am unable to answer all questions, i'm not around m at all, i don't watch the games, I watch Vegas Very Closely..
See you tomorrow
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Apparently some of you got confused on my last pick, i clearly said North Carolina -7.5, therefore i put the game number in this to want to be very clear. i never picked St. Joseph's
One poster in the last thread mentioned why not a brand name team, remote future viewers see these events in the future.the best with the most energy in the stadium these teams play at, i always played high to mid to low profile games in the time that i did bet back in the 60's and 00's, as long as it paid a profit, that's all that counted.
Now people will say why not just take the ML? like i said in the first post i am NOT the remote future viewer! what ever instructions i got back then i just did it, if they said pick Louisville - 2 i took it, never get greedy with this people. Simple, do what the instructions say.
Sorry if i am unable to answer all questions, i'm not around m at all, i don't watch the games, I watch Vegas Very Closely..
Apparently some of you got confused on my last pick, i clearly said Mount St Mary, therefore i put the game number in this one to be very clear.
One poster in the last thread mentioned why not a big tv game, remote viewers see these events the best with the least energy in the building these teams play at, i always played low profile games in the time that i did bet back in the 90's and 00's, as long as it paid, that's all that counted.
Now people will say why not just take the ML? like i said in the first post i am NOT the remote viewer! what ever instructions i got back then i just did it, if they said Josephs +4 i took it, never get greedy with this people. Simple, do what the instructions say.
Sorry if i am unable to answer all questions, i'm not around the laptop as much, mind you i am a 50+ year old man, sports is NOT my number 1 at all, i don't watch the games, just the results.
See you tomorrow.. "
LMAO FOOLERY AT ITS FINEST
0
"Pick number 2
March 8 2017
Game#565 St Josephs vs. Massachusetts
Take: St Josephs +4
Apparently some of you got confused on my last pick, i clearly said Mount St Mary, therefore i put the game number in this one to be very clear.
One poster in the last thread mentioned why not a big tv game, remote viewers see these events the best with the least energy in the building these teams play at, i always played low profile games in the time that i did bet back in the 90's and 00's, as long as it paid, that's all that counted.
Now people will say why not just take the ML? like i said in the first post i am NOT the remote viewer! what ever instructions i got back then i just did it, if they said Josephs +4 i took it, never get greedy with this people. Simple, do what the instructions say.
Sorry if i am unable to answer all questions, i'm not around the laptop as much, mind you i am a 50+ year old man, sports is NOT my number 1 at all, i don't watch the games, just the results.
Agree this dude is a clown he doesnt even have the cojones to own his bad pick he made yesterday St Joseph's +4 as his second day pick. He did however got today's pick right and tuesdays pick right which was Mt St Mary's. 2-1 is not bad but considering your retarded statement of how you picked the games and why and not owning up to your bad pick makes you look like an IDIOT.
0
Agree this dude is a clown he doesnt even have the cojones to own his bad pick he made yesterday St Joseph's +4 as his second day pick. He did however got today's pick right and tuesdays pick right which was Mt St Mary's. 2-1 is not bad but considering your retarded statement of how you picked the games and why and not owning up to your bad pick makes you look like an IDIOT.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.