All Forums | College Basketball

Good morning everybody!!! Today we singing Sunny Days are here again!! Sunny days are here again!! Very heavy sharp move on this play tonight!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10134
Posts: 212
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 687
Posted: #51

Happy Days are here again

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2019
Posts: 2912
Posted: #52

Quote Originally Posted by lmb4321:

Wright state a potential 1st half play?


that I don’t know.  Lol.  Just being bluntly honest. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 9110
Posted: #53

Well hope Phillies relief pitching by committee takes care of business...

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 687
Posted: #54

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Be careful with UIC!!! Oh it looks like a trap alright but a trap for the the let’s fade the public bettors!!! Wright State -6 is the right side here peeps!!!


why you say that?   Looked like a strong pick to me. What tipped you off?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2017
Posts: 2879
Posted: #55

Quote Originally Posted by Aproberto:

Tailed straightbets again last week and he must have had a bad week because I only won $2200, week before was almost $5K, week before that was also about $5K.    Any of the straightbets hating crowd that thinks $12k in 3 weeks for a nickel bettor is anything but great , needs to gather themself.   Please keep doing exactly what you have been doing for me for the last month and a half.

Lol.. why post that isnt even noteworthy to a penny better lmfao .. if he wins 80 to 90 percent of the time like he claims why isn't it more 

 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 15596
Posted: #56

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:

Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.
I can tell him the last two days results.  21-10 up 150 units

 

So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3. 

Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads. 

When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing. 

 

Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads. 

 

Thanks. 

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2020
Posts: 102
Posted: #57

Thank you Straight!  peace_5

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2020
Posts: 76
Posted: #58

Sent a PM an_cheers

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 305
Posted: #59

This guy takes more abuse then Trump 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2019
Posts: 2155
Posted: #60

Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:

Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.
I can tell him the last two days results.  21-10 up 150 units
  So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3.  Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads.  When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing.    Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads.    Thanks.


The record claims go both ways. You have countless trolls coming into the three and saying any game SB talks about is a play and claiming it’s a loss. Discussion for 8 hours before a game isn’t a play. I think it would solve a lot of problems to just suspend/ban anyone making personal attacks in the thread.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2019
Posts: 2912
Posted: #61

Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:

Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.
I can tell him the last two days results.  21-10 up 150 units
  So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3.  Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads.  When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing.    Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads.    Thanks.

what would be the accountable way of record keeping?

And so you know. I’m not the one who cares about records.   The people who tail my plays don’t care either. They all been making money.     It’s only the jealous in here that care 

but nevertheless please tell me what would be the accountable way of record keeping 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2019
Posts: 2912
Posted: #62

Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:

Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.
I can tell him the last two days results.  21-10 up 150 units
  So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3.  Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads.  When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing.    Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads.    Thanks.


also 24-3 was very accurate when you count ml dogs at plus 200 as 2 wins.   So based on how I calculate not just mine but everyone else’s a as well, it’s very accurate.  Because when you risk 4 units on a ml plus 200 and it wins it counts as 8 wins.   And when you bet 20 units on a -240 ml fave that counts as 48 losses.   I understand no one likes counting it that way but that is the way it is.    
you can not say a -240 loss is same as a -110 loss.  And you can’t say a plus 200 win is same as a -110 win.  They do not carry the same weight!!!   

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 305
Posted: #63

Personally, I don’t think you should have to keep a record...your true followers know how you are doing. 3/4 of the cappers on here don’t keep records anyway. Just post your picks...people can either follow you or not. Plain and simple. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2019
Posts: 2912
Posted: #64

Quote Originally Posted by Gatorhater_27:

This guy takes more abuse then Trump


lol. Cause I win and make everyone money and so the jealous cowards here can’t fathom it.   Lol

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2019
Posts: 2912
Posted: #65

Quote Originally Posted by Gatorhater_27:

Personally, I don’t think you should have to keep a record...your true followers know how you are doing. 3/4 of the cappers on here don’t keep records anyway. Just post your picks...people can either follow you or not. Plain and simple.


I agree really 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 305
Posted: #66

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by Gatorhater_27:

This guy takes more abuse then Trump
lol. Cause I win and make everyone money and so the jealous cowards here can’t fathom it.   Lol


im not complaining! I have watched and followed your picks for a few weeks now. I have made some good money tailing you. Some people just need to relax and let you do what you do, stop being greedy and expecting so much from you. Just keep doing what you have been doing and ignore the haters! I appreciate what you have done for us SB..learned some new angles to look at when capping and other things you have told us to look for along the way, it’s been very profitable! Some people have to realize this is a marathon and not a sprint! Always getting greedy and wanting it all at once from ya!

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 8621
Posted: #67

Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:

Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.
I can tell him the last two days results.  21-10 up 150 units
  So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3.  Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads.  When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing.    Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads.    Thanks.

Sounds like a great solution DJBrow Thanks!

Have a great day! peace_5

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2002
Posts: 7326
Posted: #68

Good Luck on your picks...peace_5

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2019
Posts: 74
Posted: #69

Before I followed you, I was in the Red. Badly. Not quite in the Black. Should be by next week. Just in time for the tournament. Leaving for Vegas in 8 days. Love it.

Thanks SB

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2016
Posts: 4719
Posted: #70

basically 1u is $1.00

okay..  thank you..

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 9688
Posted: #71

Bol today Str8bets, not sure how many plays u got so far today, I don't see a recap of it from Robert and don't exactly have the time to read through the long pages. If you could pls recap your plays for today u made, thx.  

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 15193
Posted: #72

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:

Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.
I can tell him the last two days results.  21-10 up 150 units
  So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3.  Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads.  When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing.    Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads.    Thanks.
also 24-3 was very accurate when you count ml dogs at plus 200 as 2 wins.   So based on how I calculate not just mine but everyone else’s a as well, it’s very accurate.  Because when you risk 4 units on a ml plus 200 and it wins it counts as 8 wins.   And when you bet 20 units on a -240 ml fave that counts as 48 losses.   I understand no one likes counting it that way but that is the way it is.    you can not say a -240 loss is same as a -110 loss.  And you can’t say a plus 200 win is same as a -110 win.  They do not carry the same weight!!!

Personally dont matter to me, as I enjoy our back and forths, whether good or bad lol..I do respect your picks and knowledge,again I dont care......but as far as record keeping in these forums, since eternity...1 game equals 1 win or loss, reguardless.....thats when units come into play..example, a dog winner at +240...and 2 regular losers ats (-110)....that would be 1-2 +.2units (+2.4  -1.1,-1.1)...........2 dog winners +150 each would be 2-0 +3 units.......a -200 ML favorite loser would be 0-1 -2u etc... Either way, GL

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2020
Posts: 79
Posted: #73

Well said GatorHater peace_5

It's not his damn job to post records.....this is a FREE forum.....do it your damn selves....and follow or fade.....PERIOD@!!!!

Trump 2020 & StraightBets 2020 moneybagan_clappeace_5

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2019
Posts: 2912
Posted: #74

Quote Originally Posted by jimbof20:

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:

Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.
I can tell him the last two days results.  21-10 up 150 units
  So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3.  Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads.  When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing.    Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads.    Thanks.
also 24-3 was very accurate when you count ml dogs at plus 200 as 2 wins.   So based on how I calculate not just mine but everyone else’s a as well, it’s very accurate.  Because when you risk 4 units on a ml plus 200 and it wins it counts as 8 wins.   And when you bet 20 units on a -240 ml fave that counts as 48 losses.   I understand no one likes counting it that way but that is the way it is.    you can not say a -240 loss is same as a -110 loss.  And you can’t say a plus 200 win is same as a -110 win.  They do not carry the same weight!!!
Personally dont matter to me, as I enjoy our back and forths, whether good or bad lol..I do respect your picks and knowledge,again I dont care......but as far as record keeping in these forums, since eternity...1 game equals 1 win or loss, reguardless.....thats when units come into play..example, a dog winner at +240...and 2 regular losers ats (-110)....that would be 1-2 +.2units (+2.4  -1.1,-1.1)...........2 dog winners +150 each would be 2-0 +3 units.......a -200 ML favorite loser would be 0-1 -2u etc... Either way, GL


any back and forth we had I feel for the most part was done with respect. There may have been one comment made by each of us to the other which crossed the line of respect and for my part I do appologize.    But overall there is nothing wrong with disagreeing with someone’s pick or someone’s betting strategy.  
but to be jealous because I get views and they don’t.  That’s their problem not mine 

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2019
Posts: 2912
Posted: #75

Quote Originally Posted by jimbof20:

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:

Quote Originally Posted by monkeymark5:

Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

do you have yesterday's results?
you can look them up. Do the work.
I can tell him the last two days results.  21-10 up 150 units
  So Straightbets, I am not bothering to go back and look at your plays, but there is little doubt you are exaggerating your record and/or units. Last week, you posted going 24-3.  Just so everyone understands, that is not against the rules but what happens is now we are going to have 500 posts in each thread with people going back and forth on what is true and not true. Us mods don't keep track of records but we do have to make sure that posts in the thread don't deviate from criticism of a play/false claims (not against the rules) to personal in nature (against the rules). So we have to go through each thread which is incredibly time consuming. And the covers team has to respond to hundreds of complaints in these threads.  When you post 'this won't lose,' 'game of the year,' '150 unit plays' you are inviting criticism, but again, not a violation of rules but neither is criticizing.    Since I spend most of my time in this forum, my plan is that if you are going to make claims on your record, but not post your plays in an accountable fashion, I will just move the threads to the penalty box so everyone can say what they want (except for racism) without us having to police the threads.    Thanks.
also 24-3 was very accurate when you count ml dogs at plus 200 as 2 wins.   So based on how I calculate not just mine but everyone else’s a as well, it’s very accurate.  Because when you risk 4 units on a ml plus 200 and it wins it counts as 8 wins.   And when you bet 20 units on a -240 ml fave that counts as 48 losses.   I understand no one likes counting it that way but that is the way it is.    you can not say a -240 loss is same as a -110 loss.  And you can’t say a plus 200 win is same as a -110 win.  They do not carry the same weight!!!
Personally dont matter to me, as I enjoy our back and forths, whether good or bad lol..I do respect your picks and knowledge,again I dont care......but as far as record keeping in these forums, since eternity...1 game equals 1 win or loss, reguardless.....thats when units come into play..example, a dog winner at +240...and 2 regular losers ats (-110)....that would be 1-2 +.2units (+2.4  -1.1,-1.1)...........2 dog winners +150 each would be 2-0 +3 units.......a -200 ML favorite loser would be 0-1 -2u etc... Either way, GL


but you can’t count it that way brother.   Units is a joke.   Because I can post 150 units on things and it means ZERO. And I was doing it to make fun of mr loot train and his 40 units. What’s 40 units???  

the only way you can count it and be accurate is the way I count them.    Ml dogs count as they are.  A plus 200 equals 2 wins.   A plus 300 equals 3 wins.   A plus 400 equals 4 wins 

a minus 200 loss equals 2 losses.   A minus 300 loss is 3 losses.    Now if you go and say 40 units on a -240 and that loses that’s 85 losses anyway you want to cut it.  It’s 85 loses brother.   And everyone with half a brain understands this!!!

All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.