i'm a long time folllower and i'ved noticed some of the lines you've been posting are bogus...i hope you have a good explanation for some of these lines...even the stanford line, as soon as the line was posted on 5dimes, it was never at -1
I am pretty sure he has a betonline account which he gets these lines from. I have a betonline account as well that i use to get opening lines from. Bet online offered Stanford -1 around 2pm on thursday so he probably got it then. It was also a pk before that too
0
Quote Originally Posted by chinawigga:
i'm a long time folllower and i'ved noticed some of the lines you've been posting are bogus...i hope you have a good explanation for some of these lines...even the stanford line, as soon as the line was posted on 5dimes, it was never at -1
I am pretty sure he has a betonline account which he gets these lines from. I have a betonline account as well that i use to get opening lines from. Bet online offered Stanford -1 around 2pm on thursday so he probably got it then. It was also a pk before that too
I am pretty sure he has a betonline account which he gets these lines from. I have a betonline account as well that i use to get opening lines from. Bet online offered Stanford -1 around 2pm on thursday so he probably got it then. It was also a pk before that too
i see and what's the juice like? ive heard a lot of bad things about that book.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DrWebster:
I am pretty sure he has a betonline account which he gets these lines from. I have a betonline account as well that i use to get opening lines from. Bet online offered Stanford -1 around 2pm on thursday so he probably got it then. It was also a pk before that too
i see and what's the juice like? ive heard a lot of bad things about that book.
i'm a long time folllower and i'ved noticed some of the lines you've been posting are bogus...i hope you have a good explanation for some of these lines...even the stanford line, as soon as the line was posted on 5dimes, it was never at -1
Bogus is unacceptable and completely untrue. I am one of the most transparent posters on this site and you being along for the ride since who knows when should know better than questioning the numbers I post.
With that said, I understand the frustration when Stanford covers by a point that may have lost for other players because they couldn't get the number I got. I will say that this isn't even the first season where the majority of my plays come from the open and I post every single wager on twitter in real-time for another line of tracking.
A lot of times I guess wrong on the open, fortunately Stanford was one of the correct times despite not getting the best number at pick and it looks like providence worked out in my favor as well. Tailing will be a winning proposition for everyone if you follow me correctly and consistently without switching up your amount risked too much. I'm sorry to everyone that may have lost on the Cardinal but please do some actual research before you question my integrity.
Also thanks to drwebster for defending me, you are awesome
0
Quote Originally Posted by chinawigga:
i'm a long time folllower and i'ved noticed some of the lines you've been posting are bogus...i hope you have a good explanation for some of these lines...even the stanford line, as soon as the line was posted on 5dimes, it was never at -1
Bogus is unacceptable and completely untrue. I am one of the most transparent posters on this site and you being along for the ride since who knows when should know better than questioning the numbers I post.
With that said, I understand the frustration when Stanford covers by a point that may have lost for other players because they couldn't get the number I got. I will say that this isn't even the first season where the majority of my plays come from the open and I post every single wager on twitter in real-time for another line of tracking.
A lot of times I guess wrong on the open, fortunately Stanford was one of the correct times despite not getting the best number at pick and it looks like providence worked out in my favor as well. Tailing will be a winning proposition for everyone if you follow me correctly and consistently without switching up your amount risked too much. I'm sorry to everyone that may have lost on the Cardinal but please do some actual research before you question my integrity.
Also thanks to drwebster for defending me, you are awesome
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
