All Forums | College Basketball

Kineprofessor's System - Plays for Wednesday

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 15738
Posts: 106
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 544
Posted: #76

Glantz-Culver Line

NCAA Basketball

Favorite Line Underdog

at UConn 5½ Marquette

at Cleveland St. 8½ Wis.-Milwaukee

Wis.-Green Bay 1½ at Youngstown St.

at Kent St. 2½ Buffalo

at Florida 6 Georgia

at James Madison Pk Old Dominion

at George Mason 17 Northeastern

at Fla. Atlantic 11 Troy

at Valparaiso 9 Loyola of Chicago

at W. Kentucky 11 Fla. International

at South Alabama 2½ Ark.-Little Rock

at Arkansas St. 5 North Texas

at La.-Lafayette 1½ Denver

at Oregon St. 1 Stanford

at Oregon 3 California

at Northwestern 4 Penn St.

at Pittsburgh 9 West Virginia

UC Santa Barbara 3 at CS Northridge

Pacific 3½ at UC Riverside

at Long Beach St. 8½ Cal Poly

at San Francisco 5½ Pepperdine

at UC Irvine 4 UC Davis

at Southern Cal Pk Arizona

at Nevada 4 Idaho

at Saint Mary’s, Calif. 4½ Gonzaga

at UCLA 11 Arizona St.

Portland 7½ at San Diego

at Fresno St. Pk Boise St.

at Santa Clara 6½ Loyola Marymount

at Hawaii 7 Louisiana Tech

E. Kentucky 5 at Tenn.-Martin

at W. Carolina 10 The Citadel

Coll. of Charleston 5 at Appalachian St.

at Georgia Southern Pk UNC Greensboro

at Davidson 11 Elon

at Tennessee St. 10½ SE Missouri

at Austin Peay 13½ E. Illinois

at Murray St. 4 Morehead St.

at E. Washington 2½ Montana St.

Montana 3½ at Portland St.

N. Arizona 7 at Sacramento St.

at Oral Roberts 5½ IUPUI

W. Illinois 4½ at Centenary

Oakland 10 at Mo.-Kansas City

IPFW 1½ at S. Utah

NBA

Favorite Line Underdog

Miami 1 at Chicago

Boston 2½ at Denver

NHL

Favorite Line Underdog Line

at Philadelphia -250 N.Y. Islanders +210

at Montreal -150 Toronto +130

at Detroit -230 Dallas +190

at Nashville -125 Chicago +105

at Vancouver -220 St. Louis +180

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 1155
Posted: #77
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

Why do so many of you whine and bitch well before a game is over? Stop gambling and/or cap your own games and stop whining when things or systems don't hit 100%. Two actual "system" games and they go 1-1


that's a bunch of garbage.. the almost system plays having been hitting at the same rate, so i played them all, call me an idiot for doing that, well you can fuck off

and KP i've got a bunch of respect for you, but the system is not doing well lately, so I think you can understand the frustration
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 376
Posted: #78
Quote Originally Posted by tidefan07:



Bowling Green covered....the score is wrong the final is 64-70 on ESPN gameplan play by play...why is it showing 60-70 on the boxscore?


you are not looking at the wrong game... but the "19:33 Dee Brown made Jumper. Assisted by Joe Jakubowski. " repeated 3 times.

And so the score was adding +2 each time... thats why it shows a 64-70 final score...

System plays 1-1 tho

PEace!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33070
Posted: #79

Quote Originally Posted by drose1:



that's a bunch of garbage.. the almost system plays having been hitting at the same rate, so i played them all, call me an idiot for doing that, well you can fuck off

and KP i've got a bunch of respect for you, but the system is not doing well lately, so I think you can understand the frustration

You going to cry for us now? Fucking baby

Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 17329
Posted: #80
Quote Originally Posted by MoshiMoshi:



you are not looking at the wrong game... but the "19:33 Dee Brown made Jumper. Assisted by Joe Jakubowski. " repeated 3 times.

And so the score was adding +2 each time... thats why it shows a 64-70 final score...

System plays 1-1 tho

PEace!



SOB...Thought I was helping you guys out...no play for me but was watching this system and thought....WTF is that? Thanks bro!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 655
Posted: #81
Citadel+10.5
Troy+10
Florida International +10.5
SE Mizz St+9

anyone see anything else?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4616
Posted: #82
Quote Originally Posted by drose1:



that's a bunch of garbage.. the almost system plays having been hitting at the same rate, so i played them all, call me an idiot for doing that, well you can fuck off

and KP i've got a bunch of respect for you, but the system is not doing well lately, so I think you can understand the frustration


No one claimed any crazy numbers for the system, just stated the numbers from last year.  I believe the system is 1 under .500 since it started on Feb 12th and if you've been on board since the presystem its 11 games over .500.  What people do with the almost system plays and moneyline plays is their own decision but there are some definite trends with the almost system plays.  Also, if you've seen the numbers that were laid out a few threads ago backtracking the system year to year and month to month you have a positive expectation with the rest of the plays for the rest of the season.  Also, if someone wanted to tinker with the system (aka throw out certain teams, expand or contract the system etc. they are free to do so).  Lastly, you should have learned a ton about these crappy teams of the last three-four weeks so there are trends emerging with these teams as well.  There are certain teams that matchup well against Greensboro and certain teams that Greensboro matches up well against.  Toledo has now won multiple times for the system but I for one will be looking for the next best time to be against them.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 601
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by PorkyinNS:

Citadel+10.5
Troy+10
Florida International +10.5
SE Mizz St+9

anyone see anything else?


that's all i see for tomorrow too
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 17329
Posted: #84
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:



No one claimed any crazy numbers for the system, just stated the numbers from last year.  I believe the system is 1 under .500 since it started on Feb 12th and if you've been on board since the presystem its 11 games over .500.  What people do with the almost system plays and moneyline plays is their own decision but there are some definite trends with the almost system plays.  Also, if you've seen the numbers that were laid out a few threads ago backtracking the system year to year and month to month you have a positive expectation with the rest of the plays for the rest of the season.  Also, if someone wanted to tinker with the system (aka throw out certain teams, expand or contract the system etc. they are free to do so).  Lastly, you should have learned a ton about these crappy teams of the last three-four weeks so there are trends emerging with these teams as well.  There are certain teams that matchup well against Greensboro and certain teams that Greensboro matches up well against.  Toledo has now won multiple times for the system but I for one will be looking for the next best time to be against them.



No need to defend the system KP..I have tweaked it on my own "like you said we could do" and it has done really well. I expanded the parameters a bit just "to see what it could do" and I have no complaints. I will say this....these games are not for the weak at heart to watch. But WOW this is much better than playing major the high key games like the majority of most. These are just my opinions and the whole key to this money management. Couple this system with your own plays and why not "grab a few hot cappers plays" equals money. Thanks for sharing this! You have my respect as always!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 1447
Posted: #85
KP.    Hope all is well.  You and the system have made as a lot of money. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 375
Posted: #86
KP why don't you make threads anymore? it would be nice to let us know your thoughts on the games
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 620
Posted: #87
KP, What up, Bud? You've left us off the chain and we're having a blast. Someone posted and I agree, flat bet these games and over-all you're winning money.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 11
Posted: #88
Quote Originally Posted by thinicesports:

System plays:  1-1

Almost plays:  0-4

and I played them all    ---------------> 

It's not the System that sucks. What sucks is when teams that have the cover most of the game give it away in the waning minutes of play. Towson St +8 had the cover till they gave it away at the very end 70-80. Bowling Green +9 (almost system play) likewise had cover till giving it away waning moments 60-70. Basically, two buckets away from System going 2-0 instead of 1-1, and Almost plays going 1-3, instead of 0-4. From losing the vig on a 3-3 day, turned ugly with the 1-5 result.

 

 

 

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 12908
Posted: #89

In defense of the "system..." I have started using it since the first loss in the "pre-system" this year. Initially, that first loss, I was really upset. Then, I realized that all of this is long-term, not short term. So, after realizing that... I am just waiting for the long-term "system" to do it's thing.

More to the point, a system is a system because it is a "system." You can't force things on the system and have it work 100%. The "almost plays" have done really well at times, but when they have lost, people have been really quick to jump on them and attack.

To me, the "almost plays" are reaching for a game to play just on the idea that the "system" is perfect and will never lose. So, in that regard, I only play the "system" games now... whether that's none, one, or a handful.

In theory, the system is a really good idea. No need to force anything in my opinion. However, everyone can do as they please with their money. Just remember, an "almost play" is not the same as a "system play"... so don't treat it like one if they fail.

Keep up the good work everyone. Let's get this back tonight!

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 13319
Posted: #90
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 57
Posted: #91
should probly find a new system... 1-6 is pretty damn bad and most of em werent even close
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 57
Posted: #92
or pick opposite of the system works too lol
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 724
Posted: #93
Guys...the SYSTEM as defined by KP was 1-1.  Anybody playing "almost system"  plays is doing so outside of the normal parameters and is therefore doing so at their own risk.  That's why it's called GAM-BLE-ING.  Stop crying about your loses and do some f'in research of your own you lazy d'bags
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 98
Posted: #94
Not a very goog  night for the system. Is thias the same system as shirleys?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 98
Posted: #95
does anybody know if this is  the same system as shirleys?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 98
Posted: #96
Hey Billy C ,did you get the lines out of the Boston Herald newspaper?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4616
Posted: #97
Quote Originally Posted by mattdagreat:

should probly find a new system... 1-6 is pretty damn bad and most of em werent even close



 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 620
Posted: #98

Originally Posted by mattdagreat should probly find a new system... 1-6 is pretty damn bad and most of em werent even close

Who were you a couple days ago? Why did you feel the need to change your name or have you added an alias?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 112
Posted: #99
People think they're ENTITLED to win EVERY night. These people bitching about the system are either new to gambling and bet too much (which is their own fault) or just started following and playing ALL THE PLAYS instead of just the system plays. I play the ALMOST plays from time to time but to play them all is not the smartest thing to do. I can't get over how people cry when they play the plays THAT ARE NOT SYSTEM plays and would've just lost juice if they (LIKE DROSE) just stick to the system plays. If you want to play the 'almost plays' then go over those and CAP THEM YOURSELVES so you have a better understanding of what you're betting on. Has anyone just handed out free money to you all year??? No, and it's never going to happen so you have to USE YOUR HEADS when you play the ALMOST plays or just stick to the system. Good Luck to all of you who are actually supporting Kine and trying to come out on top.

One final thing DRose and other negative nancys, I do not care which system you follow but THERE IS ZERO SYSTEMS THAT WILL PROFIT EVERY SINGLE NIGHT. EVERY SYSTEM HAS THEIR UPS AND DOWNS SO IT ALL AVERAGES ALL OUT!!! You can't forget, sometimes not playing a game is a WIN, so NEVER play every single game or you're bound to get hit like you did.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 119
Posted: #100

Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:



No one claimed any crazy numbers for the system, just stated the numbers from last year.  I believe the system is 1 under .500 since it started on Feb 12th and if you've been on board since the presystem its 11 games over .500.  What people do with the almost system plays and moneyline plays is their own decision but there are some definite trends with the almost system plays.  Also, if you've seen the numbers that were laid out a few threads ago backtracking the system year to year and month to month you have a positive expectation with the rest of the plays for the rest of the season.  Also, if someone wanted to tinker with the system (aka throw out certain teams, expand or contract the system etc. they are free to do so).  Lastly, you should have learned a ton about these crappy teams of the last three-four weeks so there are trends emerging with these teams as well.  There are certain teams that matchup well against Greensboro and certain teams that Greensboro matches up well against.  Toledo has now won multiple times for the system but I for one will be looking for the next best time to be against them.

1 under .500 isnt that bad one night can make it 3 over, the system has been doing ok but could be doing better, lots of close losses with questionalbe fouls at the end ect... but if this system has taught me anything is that the public loses alot and that the system relies alot on public perception.

All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.