ok I am going to go with N Texas +1 too much defense and this team is averaging just like 8 to's in their last 3 games while Okla st is avg 15 and I am leaning under 136.5 again the defense should get this for N Texas
N Texas +1 1.5 units
Confirmation: 8671708
Date Placed: 03/25/25 16:56:06 Header: INTERNET: Straight Bet risk 168.00 win 150.00 Bet Details:
NCAA NIT TOURNAMENT - Quarterfinals 611 North Texas +1 (-112) risk 168.00 win 150.00 (NCAA Men NIT Tournament)
0
ok I am going to go with N Texas +1 too much defense and this team is averaging just like 8 to's in their last 3 games while Okla st is avg 15 and I am leaning under 136.5 again the defense should get this for N Texas
N Texas +1 1.5 units
Confirmation: 8671708
Date Placed: 03/25/25 16:56:06 Header: INTERNET: Straight Bet risk 168.00 win 150.00 Bet Details:
NCAA NIT TOURNAMENT - Quarterfinals 611 North Texas +1 (-112) risk 168.00 win 150.00 (NCAA Men NIT Tournament)
Good luck.. that’s basically my parlays. Got about 10 of them.. I know the Florida game went down.. but they are my fav… have not played well yet.. and are just due to put it together… I swear that guard for them is as clutch as they get… reminds me of Chris Jackson of LSU, back in the day… he does NOT miss open shot. Guards are major part of Purdue … and I think Florida will wear these guys out… and I think Florida big men are due … missed a few crucial free throws last game… and you could see in his face… that stress was a factor.. that should help them. I have Duke cutting down nets though… I think they are the most complete team… and they are not up n down … the guy hurting ankle helped them now … 2 of their best players are freshman… and that keeps me from guaranteeing the duckies cut down nets… just my opinion. Good luck tonight.
1
Good luck.. that’s basically my parlays. Got about 10 of them.. I know the Florida game went down.. but they are my fav… have not played well yet.. and are just due to put it together… I swear that guard for them is as clutch as they get… reminds me of Chris Jackson of LSU, back in the day… he does NOT miss open shot. Guards are major part of Purdue … and I think Florida will wear these guys out… and I think Florida big men are due … missed a few crucial free throws last game… and you could see in his face… that stress was a factor.. that should help them. I have Duke cutting down nets though… I think they are the most complete team… and they are not up n down … the guy hurting ankle helped them now … 2 of their best players are freshman… and that keeps me from guaranteeing the duckies cut down nets… just my opinion. Good luck tonight.
Ya seems like most and eventually all books will stop letting us bet 1/2 pts. Draft Kings switched a couple months ago. I use 7-8 books and only Bet365 and Ballys let me buy 1/2 pts, which is something I guess but don’t like them as much as say Fanduel, DK, or MGM. Anyway good luck rest of college bb season and thanks for your help in making myself some cash
-
1
@RUM151
Ya seems like most and eventually all books will stop letting us bet 1/2 pts. Draft Kings switched a couple months ago. I use 7-8 books and only Bet365 and Ballys let me buy 1/2 pts, which is something I guess but don’t like them as much as say Fanduel, DK, or MGM. Anyway good luck rest of college bb season and thanks for your help in making myself some cash
a half pt is great all you really need I know I had friends who quit Fanduel last year they could not buy down a half or up a half it had to be like 2.5 pts at crazy juice as long as they let you get off that half pt I mean why get 4.5 when you can get 5 or lay 3.5 when you can lay 3 its 10.00 and you have to lose for it to cost ya the extra juice now if your betting 550 a game and have to add 50 if it was 1 game I still would but if I bet 6 games and had to buy the ha;f on all now that could get costly I could bet so much more but I do not need to, I am just trying to pick winners
0
@Fuzzer44
a half pt is great all you really need I know I had friends who quit Fanduel last year they could not buy down a half or up a half it had to be like 2.5 pts at crazy juice as long as they let you get off that half pt I mean why get 4.5 when you can get 5 or lay 3.5 when you can lay 3 its 10.00 and you have to lose for it to cost ya the extra juice now if your betting 550 a game and have to add 50 if it was 1 game I still would but if I bet 6 games and had to buy the ha;f on all now that could get costly I could bet so much more but I do not need to, I am just trying to pick winners
100% agree. If a line is 3.5, 4.5, etc…I usually always buy a half pt and it’s helped me many times to push instead of lose. Especially in football with the 3.5 and 7.5, which costs a lil more to pay for bit well worth it in my opinion. Well, I guess it’s helped many cuz these books now are on it. And yes fanduel is weird in buying points, they have alternate spread where u have to buy many points???? you mentioned it couple days ago when line was 3.5 and team ended up winning by 3 and you said why wouldn’t you buy down to 3 which is what I did do also and didn’t lose.
-
1
@RUM151
100% agree. If a line is 3.5, 4.5, etc…I usually always buy a half pt and it’s helped me many times to push instead of lose. Especially in football with the 3.5 and 7.5, which costs a lil more to pay for bit well worth it in my opinion. Well, I guess it’s helped many cuz these books now are on it. And yes fanduel is weird in buying points, they have alternate spread where u have to buy many points???? you mentioned it couple days ago when line was 3.5 and team ended up winning by 3 and you said why wouldn’t you buy down to 3 which is what I did do also and didn’t lose.
SOB!!! well that's why ya ,maybe buy down to -5 ...lol all these games are coming down to the spreads I swear , Ill st just could never get a lead of more than 1 or 2 until under a min to go, all through that game everytime they got a lead somehow ICW would score to take it back...I kept thinking with under 7 mins to go if Ill st gets a 3 pt lead they will start to pull away and they couldn't, also up 4 and that guy hit a hell of a 3 if he missed they would have fouled and maybe we get to up 6 oh well we win 2 and lose 1 by a friggin point,
Over 148 wins
Chattanooga wins after being down 16 and when they fell behind early 12-2 ya know they were +9.5 live i"m not going to say I bet it, but I just happen to know exactly what it was , those are good times to get another bet in on your dog, knowing they may get close later
chatt+4 winner
Ill st-6 errrrr win by 5
0
SOB!!! well that's why ya ,maybe buy down to -5 ...lol all these games are coming down to the spreads I swear , Ill st just could never get a lead of more than 1 or 2 until under a min to go, all through that game everytime they got a lead somehow ICW would score to take it back...I kept thinking with under 7 mins to go if Ill st gets a 3 pt lead they will start to pull away and they couldn't, also up 4 and that guy hit a hell of a 3 if he missed they would have fouled and maybe we get to up 6 oh well we win 2 and lose 1 by a friggin point,
Over 148 wins
Chattanooga wins after being down 16 and when they fell behind early 12-2 ya know they were +9.5 live i"m not going to say I bet it, but I just happen to know exactly what it was , those are good times to get another bet in on your dog, knowing they may get close later
about 15 mins before 7 that N Texas line at HardRock moved to N Texas -1.5 yet is was +1 at a few others and the damn under looks good right now had it in the Parlay but lost that wasn't thinking to bet it STR up did not want to keep adding plays just letting it roll with what I had in wish I had though 137 this should stay under 131
0
about 15 mins before 7 that N Texas line at HardRock moved to N Texas -1.5 yet is was +1 at a few others and the damn under looks good right now had it in the Parlay but lost that wasn't thinking to bet it STR up did not want to keep adding plays just letting it roll with what I had in wish I had though 137 this should stay under 131
well Kent st at Loyola got 2 teams here both won outright on the road last game, both in very close games, Kent st held on to the lead vs Stanford the whole 2nd half except for a few minutes when Stanford took a 49-47 lead but once they took it back they went up by about 7 and held on the rest of they way, even when it got close again late they never gave it up, shows a lot on the road ......
Loyola also had a halftime lead but in the 2nd half the 2 teams went back and forth taking the lead with neither team have more than a 4 pt lead, by the lead switched many times, and late SF had a 73-70 lead with 2:47 left, then SF took it back with under 2 mins and what's odd about this game is it was 77-76 Loyola with 56 sec's left and no one scored a point after that, Loyola held the ball most of the remaining time as Malik Thomas for SF missed a layup with 41 sec's left , and Loyola had a layup blocked with 15 sec's left and got the offensive rebound, and then missed a 3, and then again Malik Thomas missed a last second layup to end the game
this looks like it should be a very good game, only thing is Loyola gets to play at home and Kent st again travels from California to chicago and has to again play on the road , but Kent st has done well this year away, as they are 10-5 STR up away this year and 9-5-1 ats away, and are 12-3 STR up in non conf games this year and are 8-3-2 ats in non conf games ....right now I am leaning both away dogs tonight , both lines are the same which is odd , and ya wonder about the travel for Kent st, they played at St Bonnie, then traveled out west to Stanford , now back to Chicago ...while Loyola played at San Jose then stayed in Cali and played SF and now goes home , Kent st has traveled a long way these past few days ....line right now is Loyola -4.5 -120 Kent st is +4.5 +100 so maybe this does go up to 5 and I do favor Kent st here I think so I may wait to see if 5 shows up
0
4-1 last night only loss was Ill st by 1 point
well Kent st at Loyola got 2 teams here both won outright on the road last game, both in very close games, Kent st held on to the lead vs Stanford the whole 2nd half except for a few minutes when Stanford took a 49-47 lead but once they took it back they went up by about 7 and held on the rest of they way, even when it got close again late they never gave it up, shows a lot on the road ......
Loyola also had a halftime lead but in the 2nd half the 2 teams went back and forth taking the lead with neither team have more than a 4 pt lead, by the lead switched many times, and late SF had a 73-70 lead with 2:47 left, then SF took it back with under 2 mins and what's odd about this game is it was 77-76 Loyola with 56 sec's left and no one scored a point after that, Loyola held the ball most of the remaining time as Malik Thomas for SF missed a layup with 41 sec's left , and Loyola had a layup blocked with 15 sec's left and got the offensive rebound, and then missed a 3, and then again Malik Thomas missed a last second layup to end the game
this looks like it should be a very good game, only thing is Loyola gets to play at home and Kent st again travels from California to chicago and has to again play on the road , but Kent st has done well this year away, as they are 10-5 STR up away this year and 9-5-1 ats away, and are 12-3 STR up in non conf games this year and are 8-3-2 ats in non conf games ....right now I am leaning both away dogs tonight , both lines are the same which is odd , and ya wonder about the travel for Kent st, they played at St Bonnie, then traveled out west to Stanford , now back to Chicago ...while Loyola played at San Jose then stayed in Cali and played SF and now goes home , Kent st has traveled a long way these past few days ....line right now is Loyola -4.5 -120 Kent st is +4.5 +100 so maybe this does go up to 5 and I do favor Kent st here I think so I may wait to see if 5 shows up
UC Irvine is -4.5 vs UAB Uab beat St Joes and then went out west and beat Santa Clara and now stay out there and play UC Irvine so not much travel , I think UAB is the play here, this team was so close to getting into the NCAA tourney, if they would have beaten Memphis they were in , and sometimes teams like that have an edge , have to think trying to show the NCAA they made a mistake by not taking them , I do like UAB here in this one, even though UCI beat Jax st , Jax st to be honest maybe could have won that game if they made ft's down the stretch and they missed 8 ft's in the game shooting 63% 14/22 and they had 14 offensive rebounds , but shot poorly from 3 also only 23% and shot 36% for the game while UCI shot 39% and 34% from 3 making 9 3's to only 5 for Jax st and shot 81% at the line only missing 2....Jax st had a 55-53 lead with 5 mins left and then were down 58-55 ..then down 62-58 with 3 mins to go Jax st missed the front end of a 1-1, then turned it over, then still down 62-58 Jax st missed 2 ft's , then still 62-58 Jax st turned it over again with 39 sec's left and fouled and then down 6 they missed the front end of a 1-1 so Jax st really killed theirself, they played good defense holding Irvine for over 3 mins without a score but could not make ft's and kept turning it over
UAB beat Santa Clara 88-84 they made some ft's late but also missed a couple late that could have made it a 2 poss game , but they are a much better offensive team than Jax st , and they did make more ft's late when they needed too, they were in a back and forth game but once they took the lead with like 4 mins left they held on and they did have a big edge at the ft line making 19/26 while Santa Clara was just 9/14 but they also shot 44% from 3 I am on UAB here +5 buying up a half pt -120
Confirmation: 8676257
Date Placed: 03/26/25 02:40:32 Header: INTERNET: Straight Bet risk 120.00 win 100.00 Bet Details:
NCAA NIT TOURNAMENT - Quarterfinals 621 UAB +5 Buy ½ (-120) risk 120.00 win 100.00 (NCAA Men NIT Tournament)
0
UC Irvine is -4.5 vs UAB Uab beat St Joes and then went out west and beat Santa Clara and now stay out there and play UC Irvine so not much travel , I think UAB is the play here, this team was so close to getting into the NCAA tourney, if they would have beaten Memphis they were in , and sometimes teams like that have an edge , have to think trying to show the NCAA they made a mistake by not taking them , I do like UAB here in this one, even though UCI beat Jax st , Jax st to be honest maybe could have won that game if they made ft's down the stretch and they missed 8 ft's in the game shooting 63% 14/22 and they had 14 offensive rebounds , but shot poorly from 3 also only 23% and shot 36% for the game while UCI shot 39% and 34% from 3 making 9 3's to only 5 for Jax st and shot 81% at the line only missing 2....Jax st had a 55-53 lead with 5 mins left and then were down 58-55 ..then down 62-58 with 3 mins to go Jax st missed the front end of a 1-1, then turned it over, then still down 62-58 Jax st missed 2 ft's , then still 62-58 Jax st turned it over again with 39 sec's left and fouled and then down 6 they missed the front end of a 1-1 so Jax st really killed theirself, they played good defense holding Irvine for over 3 mins without a score but could not make ft's and kept turning it over
UAB beat Santa Clara 88-84 they made some ft's late but also missed a couple late that could have made it a 2 poss game , but they are a much better offensive team than Jax st , and they did make more ft's late when they needed too, they were in a back and forth game but once they took the lead with like 4 mins left they held on and they did have a big edge at the ft line making 19/26 while Santa Clara was just 9/14 but they also shot 44% from 3 I am on UAB here +5 buying up a half pt -120
Confirmation: 8676257
Date Placed: 03/26/25 02:40:32 Header: INTERNET: Straight Bet risk 120.00 win 100.00 Bet Details:
NCAA NIT TOURNAMENT - Quarterfinals 621 UAB +5 Buy ½ (-120) risk 120.00 win 100.00 (NCAA Men NIT Tournament)
Morning Rum…I do so much better in general betting on college football and basketball, especially early in season, where if you know your stuff, which u definitely do, you can find a lot of great lines. I feel I can look at college football games early in week and just pick out the games where I will make a profit. I’m starting to get the gist in college bb, mainly thanks to lot of “cappers” on here. Sucks season coming to end already cuz have been doing well and So fortunate to have found this site. I make my picks then look on here and if many agree then I feel I can’t lose, which you do sometimes, but not nearly as much if you listen to the right people. Pro sports though, forget about it. I just can’t figure it out. NFL is ok and can’t wait to see how I do using “Covers” as an aid to make some cash. Really excited for baseball coming up which I never really gambled on. Hope you can help out and maybe even give me names of the better ones here to follow. NBA I’ll dabble for rest of year but I suck altogether.
anyway rum sorry for blowing up your posts/threads whatever but basically saying I love to gamble. Used to be a degenerate in my early years and now a lil more polished and controlled and make money lot of times. Maybe still a lil too cautious but learning a shitload from being here and being appreciative for you and many others here dropping knowledge and helping many beat the books ass. I don’t post picks but hoping I get good enough to do so soon. Thanks again rum and the others here putting their time in to help peeps make some extra bank and having fun doing it
good luck!
-
1
@RUM151
Morning Rum…I do so much better in general betting on college football and basketball, especially early in season, where if you know your stuff, which u definitely do, you can find a lot of great lines. I feel I can look at college football games early in week and just pick out the games where I will make a profit. I’m starting to get the gist in college bb, mainly thanks to lot of “cappers” on here. Sucks season coming to end already cuz have been doing well and So fortunate to have found this site. I make my picks then look on here and if many agree then I feel I can’t lose, which you do sometimes, but not nearly as much if you listen to the right people. Pro sports though, forget about it. I just can’t figure it out. NFL is ok and can’t wait to see how I do using “Covers” as an aid to make some cash. Really excited for baseball coming up which I never really gambled on. Hope you can help out and maybe even give me names of the better ones here to follow. NBA I’ll dabble for rest of year but I suck altogether.
anyway rum sorry for blowing up your posts/threads whatever but basically saying I love to gamble. Used to be a degenerate in my early years and now a lil more polished and controlled and make money lot of times. Maybe still a lil too cautious but learning a shitload from being here and being appreciative for you and many others here dropping knowledge and helping many beat the books ass. I don’t post picks but hoping I get good enough to do so soon. Thanks again rum and the others here putting their time in to help peeps make some extra bank and having fun doing it
always enjoy reading thoughts my friend , my threads are always open to discussion about anything to do with picks, handicapping, or just thinking out loud about upcoming games , never claim to know it all, always open to opinions, the minute we think we know more than others, or that we have this shit down pat, we are in trouble, the best thing is to maybe hear why someone likes the other side,
wish ya the best always feel free to pop in and share gl
2
@Fuzzer44
always enjoy reading thoughts my friend , my threads are always open to discussion about anything to do with picks, handicapping, or just thinking out loud about upcoming games , never claim to know it all, always open to opinions, the minute we think we know more than others, or that we have this shit down pat, we are in trouble, the best thing is to maybe hear why someone likes the other side,
wish ya the best always feel free to pop in and share gl
well I was damn near exact when I guessed what the line would be in the Illinois st/Clev st game last night well before they came out....I said Illinois st -1.5 142 line came out Illinois st -1 141.5 .lol too funny but then I did do this for a few years at WWTS , so this line has went up 1.5 pts as the line is now -2.5 total is the same 141.5 again I could not get a line last night on either book, so could not get the lower line
should be a good game, and both teams last night did not shoot well, we did hit the over in the I'll st game and the total pushed on the Clev st game at 137.....Ill st shot 43.6% not great but not bad and only 29% from 3 they had 10 to's 36 reb and 11 offensive reb's and 12 assist clev st shot just 37% and 37% from 3 8 to's 35 reb's 14 offensive , so this should also be a rebounding battle, who will control the boards and its going to be important for Ill st to not get Walker into foul trouble, he had 27 pts last night , and Illinois st can shoot better and so can Clev st, I am going to go OVER 141 in this game, I think Ill st can get 74-76 pts Clev st shot well below what they shot a day earlier when they shot 60%, and 40% from 3 both teams last night did not attempt a lot of 3's 17 for Ill st and 16 for Clev st
0
well I was damn near exact when I guessed what the line would be in the Illinois st/Clev st game last night well before they came out....I said Illinois st -1.5 142 line came out Illinois st -1 141.5 .lol too funny but then I did do this for a few years at WWTS , so this line has went up 1.5 pts as the line is now -2.5 total is the same 141.5 again I could not get a line last night on either book, so could not get the lower line
should be a good game, and both teams last night did not shoot well, we did hit the over in the I'll st game and the total pushed on the Clev st game at 137.....Ill st shot 43.6% not great but not bad and only 29% from 3 they had 10 to's 36 reb and 11 offensive reb's and 12 assist clev st shot just 37% and 37% from 3 8 to's 35 reb's 14 offensive , so this should also be a rebounding battle, who will control the boards and its going to be important for Ill st to not get Walker into foul trouble, he had 27 pts last night , and Illinois st can shoot better and so can Clev st, I am going to go OVER 141 in this game, I think Ill st can get 74-76 pts Clev st shot well below what they shot a day earlier when they shot 60%, and 40% from 3 both teams last night did not attempt a lot of 3's 17 for Ill st and 16 for Clev st
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
