0-8,,,,,,,2,,,,,,,(0-2),,beware of teams covering higher
0-9,,,,,,,2.......(0-2)
0-10,,,,,2,,,,,,,(0-2)
0-11,,,,,2,,,,,,,(2-0)
0-12,,,,,0,,,,,,,(0-0)
This reflects all streaks and their progression
for season to date. As list shows WIN streaks can't cover by streak at 8-0 where LOSS streaks seem to cover by Level 7
This also gives you an Insight at what level most streaks stop
It also gives you the differential between wins and loss and odds makers difficulty areas of concern in attempting to balance out plays
Does this mean if a team has won the past 3-10 games ATS would fall into the top category? In addition the team that has fallen into one of those streak category shows that in the parenthesis () is their (Win - Lost) ATS record when at that specific streak number ATS?
In opposite, if a team has lost against the spread the past 3-10 games they would fall under the bottom category? concluding the same as if a team falls under that specific loss streak the parenthesis () is their (Win-Lost) ATS record at that specific streak number?
Thank you for the clarifications. Appreciate your thread
0
Quote Originally Posted by stevo1:
Win streaks this season (no cover) Completed
3-0,,,,,195 (117-78)
4-0 ,,,,72,,,(39-33)
5-0,,,,,30,,,(8-22),,,,,,,,,,,,
6-0,,,,,17,,,(9-8)
7-0,,,,,8,,,,,(3-5)
8-0,,,,,4,,,,,(3-1)
9-0,,,,,1,,,,,(1-0)
10-0,,,0,,,,,(0-0)
__________________________
Loss Streaks to Cover Completed
0-3,,,,,,,163,,,(73-90)
0-4,,,,,,,86,,,,,(43-43)
0-5,,,,,,,37,,,,,(15-22)
0-6,,,,,,,20,,,,,(9-11)
0-7,,,,,,,9,,,,,,,(7-2),,,,,,,,,,
0-8,,,,,,,2,,,,,,,(0-2),,beware of teams covering higher
0-9,,,,,,,2.......(0-2)
0-10,,,,,2,,,,,,,(0-2)
0-11,,,,,2,,,,,,,(2-0)
0-12,,,,,0,,,,,,,(0-0)
This reflects all streaks and their progression
for season to date. As list shows WIN streaks can't cover by streak at 8-0 where LOSS streaks seem to cover by Level 7
This also gives you an Insight at what level most streaks stop
It also gives you the differential between wins and loss and odds makers difficulty areas of concern in attempting to balance out plays
Does this mean if a team has won the past 3-10 games ATS would fall into the top category? In addition the team that has fallen into one of those streak category shows that in the parenthesis () is their (Win - Lost) ATS record when at that specific streak number ATS?
In opposite, if a team has lost against the spread the past 3-10 games they would fall under the bottom category? concluding the same as if a team falls under that specific loss streak the parenthesis () is their (Win-Lost) ATS record at that specific streak number?
Thank you for the clarifications. Appreciate your thread
Help me!! I'm trying to understand your system. I think I'm beginning to get it, but I still have questions.
Green Bay Wisc is on a 6-0 run, with a -10 spread at Illinois Chicago. You give them a pass because the 6-0 streak is 8-9 . . . 53%. If 3 more 6-0 streaks come in, with the same game (GB at IllChi), then we would bet on the 6-0 streak to cover because the overall streak would be 8 losses with 12 wins . . . 60%.
Would the -10 spread be set different by the bookies for the same game?
Second Question: Why are wins listed 1st sometimes and losses listed 1st sometimes?
0
Help me!! I'm trying to understand your system. I think I'm beginning to get it, but I still have questions.
Green Bay Wisc is on a 6-0 run, with a -10 spread at Illinois Chicago. You give them a pass because the 6-0 streak is 8-9 . . . 53%. If 3 more 6-0 streaks come in, with the same game (GB at IllChi), then we would bet on the 6-0 streak to cover because the overall streak would be 8 losses with 12 wins . . . 60%.
Would the -10 spread be set different by the bookies for the same game?
Second Question: Why are wins listed 1st sometimes and losses listed 1st sometimes?
goat,,i never concern myself about the point spread as normally i know days b 4 what streak team i'm playing due to streaks record and if record says they will not cover/or will cover that is where i follow the record at that time
0
goat,,i never concern myself about the point spread as normally i know days b 4 what streak team i'm playing due to streaks record and if record says they will not cover/or will cover that is where i follow the record at that time
I never concern myself about the point spread as the records reflect the odds makers ability to balance out the play and where you see various differences between a cover and no cover and if % is at 60 or above then that is a play to follow
Lou tech is at 5-0 and that record says ANY TEAM AT 5-0 will COVER as Record reflects at 22-8 to do the opposite of what streak system expects and that is to not cover at 8-22 but it is not happening so we reverse play 22-8 to take advantage of odds makers shortage in points against them as record reflects
0
I never concern myself about the point spread as the records reflect the odds makers ability to balance out the play and where you see various differences between a cover and no cover and if % is at 60 or above then that is a play to follow
Lou tech is at 5-0 and that record says ANY TEAM AT 5-0 will COVER as Record reflects at 22-8 to do the opposite of what streak system expects and that is to not cover at 8-22 but it is not happening so we reverse play 22-8 to take advantage of odds makers shortage in points against them as record reflects
well boys guess after yesterday going 4-1 we were due for a let down today and to be honest at 22-9 now to continue we may need to temper this streak level due to its extremely good performance of late as nothing lasts forever and we had this dip in early January around 1/3/14 which system was at 12-3 so it was expected but you never know when it will show up
Appears Minn did not cover against 3-0 Iowa although record was calling for a no cover
0
well boys guess after yesterday going 4-1 we were due for a let down today and to be honest at 22-9 now to continue we may need to temper this streak level due to its extremely good performance of late as nothing lasts forever and we had this dip in early January around 1/3/14 which system was at 12-3 so it was expected but you never know when it will show up
Guess after 5-0 going 4-1 yesterday should had figured it would turn against the system as no system can continue to cover regardless of the streak
but what is nice Hofstra and Smu both at 4-0 so we will get another 5-0 win streak team after today and we will get that lost wager back i can tell you that.
Green bay Pheonix who we just won with on fri Night succumbs to ATS and can't cover and 6-0 streaks to not cover goes to 10-8 although we passed on it due to past record at 9-8 so passing it was the correct play
Virginia will be the next 5-0 win streak that plays on 1/20 so we have a couple days to recover but we will be ready
Iowa although covered today against system moves to 4-0 and if can get by that level we could wind up playing them at 5-0 but that is another play away
0-5 Virginia Tech plays later today and that streak record says they will not cover at 15-22 although below our normal % to play but may try it for one unit to not cover
0
eagle I know the feeling
Guess after 5-0 going 4-1 yesterday should had figured it would turn against the system as no system can continue to cover regardless of the streak
but what is nice Hofstra and Smu both at 4-0 so we will get another 5-0 win streak team after today and we will get that lost wager back i can tell you that.
Green bay Pheonix who we just won with on fri Night succumbs to ATS and can't cover and 6-0 streaks to not cover goes to 10-8 although we passed on it due to past record at 9-8 so passing it was the correct play
Virginia will be the next 5-0 win streak that plays on 1/20 so we have a couple days to recover but we will be ready
Iowa although covered today against system moves to 4-0 and if can get by that level we could wind up playing them at 5-0 but that is another play away
0-5 Virginia Tech plays later today and that streak record says they will not cover at 15-22 although below our normal % to play but may try it for one unit to not cover
V.Tech is 0-5 ATS & N.Dame is 0-3 ATS & IS 1-8 ATS as favorite Alot of players on Oregon tonight, they won 6 of last 7 vs Oregonst & swept them last yr.Oregon is 0-6 ATS.
0
V.Tech is 0-5 ATS & N.Dame is 0-3 ATS & IS 1-8 ATS as favorite Alot of players on Oregon tonight, they won 6 of last 7 vs Oregonst & swept them last yr.Oregon is 0-6 ATS.
V.Tech is 0-5 ATS & N.Dame is 0-3 ATS & IS 1-8 ATS as favorite Alot of players on Oregon tonight, they won 6 of last 7 vs Oregonst & swept them last yr.Oregon is 0-6 ATS.
so would Oregon be the play? maybe for the newbiews when you guys explain these things you could just quickly list the play ! haha sorry for bing a diva !
0
Quote Originally Posted by RLeith35:
V.Tech is 0-5 ATS & N.Dame is 0-3 ATS & IS 1-8 ATS as favorite Alot of players on Oregon tonight, they won 6 of last 7 vs Oregonst & swept them last yr.Oregon is 0-6 ATS.
so would Oregon be the play? maybe for the newbiews when you guys explain these things you could just quickly list the play ! haha sorry for bing a diva !
Guess after 5-0 going 4-1 yesterday should had figured it would turn against the system as no system can continue to cover regardless of the streak
but what is nice Hofstra and Smu both at 4-0 so we will get another 5-0 win streak team after today and we will get that lost wager back i can tell you that.
Green bay Pheonix who we just won with on fri Night succumbs to ATS and can't cover and 6-0 streaks to not cover goes to 10-8 although we passed on it due to past record at 9-8 so passing it was the correct play
Virginia will be the next 5-0 win streak that plays on 1/20 so we have a couple days to recover but we will be ready
Iowa although covered today against system moves to 4-0 and if can get by that level we could wind up playing them at 5-0 but that is another play away
0-5 Virginia Tech plays later today and that streak record says they will not cover at 15-22 although below our normal % to play but may try it for one unit to not cover
Hey I appreciate the work your doing. I took Cal yesterday and won a little.
0
Quote Originally Posted by stevo1:
eagle I know the feeling
Guess after 5-0 going 4-1 yesterday should had figured it would turn against the system as no system can continue to cover regardless of the streak
but what is nice Hofstra and Smu both at 4-0 so we will get another 5-0 win streak team after today and we will get that lost wager back i can tell you that.
Green bay Pheonix who we just won with on fri Night succumbs to ATS and can't cover and 6-0 streaks to not cover goes to 10-8 although we passed on it due to past record at 9-8 so passing it was the correct play
Virginia will be the next 5-0 win streak that plays on 1/20 so we have a couple days to recover but we will be ready
Iowa although covered today against system moves to 4-0 and if can get by that level we could wind up playing them at 5-0 but that is another play away
0-5 Virginia Tech plays later today and that streak record says they will not cover at 15-22 although below our normal % to play but may try it for one unit to not cover
Hey I appreciate the work your doing. I took Cal yesterday and won a little.
evening guys ,,,been watching the NFL and at least had Manning and co for a few units
Not happy with how streak records went today but hey noting is purrfect
the 5-0 streaks took a hit but in all honesty system was looking for a no cover but with the record to not cover at 8-22 we reversed the play as we have been doing since early January so we will have pit falls along the way but the records of past 3 years speaks for itself and is all recorded back with in the thread for any newbees just now looking in
I can resurrect them if requested
Been putting plays together for tomorrow and we do have another 5-0 streak team playing Virginia so i will play them to cover for 5 units but plz play within your budget as i have a large bankroll due to playing this streak system since day one
8-0 Xavier also plays and that streak record to not cover is very good this year at 3-1 they will not cover at 75% to stop
( those teams that tried to go to 9-0 were Umass,Oregon and
Creighton and odds makers stopped them and just Unlv was able to get to 9-0 streak and then they failed to cover the spread and is the only team able to get to 9-0 this season
The odds Xavier will get higher is 75% against them and past teams that have tried are proof the odds are not in their favor
0-7 Marquette is on the other side of thing at 0-7 needing a cover and that streak record to cover is 7-2 like Penn St was on Saturday in which they covered and stopped their loss streak along with 6 other loss streak teams and just 2 East ILL and N Dakota have excelled much higher this season to the 0-11 level b 4 they both finally covered and should Marquette not cover at their current streak the could go to 0-11 as the other 2 loss streak teams did,So this game is their Moment of truth to cover the Point spread before all hell could break loose and go higher as the other 2 Pathetic teams
The balance of other streak plays are in the lower streak level and i'll touch on those later tomorrow
0
evening guys ,,,been watching the NFL and at least had Manning and co for a few units
Not happy with how streak records went today but hey noting is purrfect
the 5-0 streaks took a hit but in all honesty system was looking for a no cover but with the record to not cover at 8-22 we reversed the play as we have been doing since early January so we will have pit falls along the way but the records of past 3 years speaks for itself and is all recorded back with in the thread for any newbees just now looking in
I can resurrect them if requested
Been putting plays together for tomorrow and we do have another 5-0 streak team playing Virginia so i will play them to cover for 5 units but plz play within your budget as i have a large bankroll due to playing this streak system since day one
8-0 Xavier also plays and that streak record to not cover is very good this year at 3-1 they will not cover at 75% to stop
( those teams that tried to go to 9-0 were Umass,Oregon and
Creighton and odds makers stopped them and just Unlv was able to get to 9-0 streak and then they failed to cover the spread and is the only team able to get to 9-0 this season
The odds Xavier will get higher is 75% against them and past teams that have tried are proof the odds are not in their favor
0-7 Marquette is on the other side of thing at 0-7 needing a cover and that streak record to cover is 7-2 like Penn St was on Saturday in which they covered and stopped their loss streak along with 6 other loss streak teams and just 2 East ILL and N Dakota have excelled much higher this season to the 0-11 level b 4 they both finally covered and should Marquette not cover at their current streak the could go to 0-11 as the other 2 loss streak teams did,So this game is their Moment of truth to cover the Point spread before all hell could break loose and go higher as the other 2 Pathetic teams
The balance of other streak plays are in the lower streak level and i'll touch on those later tomorrow
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
,,,
,,odds makers only giving +3 and is that all their starter was worth 
I was on both
Hot Forum Topics
