Nova/St Joes

How the hell did the line makers only install Villanova as 1 1/2 point favorite as the opening line 

The shit don’t flush

Now up to 2.5

@EastsideBangers

 Agreed. I guess that double digit loss at home to Columbia is either giving them a big discount at the window or exposing them. Hmm…. Trap or no trap…

2 coaches that will try to one-up eachother for best losing gameplan.  or really, one-down eachother.  last one with the ball loses.  

neptune gonna instruct the team to intentionally foul with 3 seconds left despite being up by 1, lange will tell the st joes ft shooter to miss both intentionally and not crash the boards.  Tho nova may still end up losing in that scenario somehow

St Joes +2.5 for me  Nova is flaky 

I will take the sharp side and Villanova .. only 23% of tickets on Nova yet line moves from -1.5 to -3 with sharp money on Nova.. Nova or nothing for me 

@Eddy_Winslow

 but hes jake wit da jumper tho 

Not to sure about this one 

where did you get that information from??

How the mighty have fallen. I'm embarrassed watching Kyle Neptune drive this team into the ground.

 Bring back Rollie

Villanova has a donkey as a head coach. I could coach that team better

@Eddy_Winslow

 Guarantee you Villanova has sharp action on them and the line move is a reflection of it 

Here's some betting info, how much trust do you put into it however,

Spread.com has 67% of the bets coming in on St Joes while sports bettingdime.com has 70% of the action on St Joes but the money is close, with Nova garnering 53% of the take currently. I'm sure other sites may reflect differently as well. Something to consider, when it's all one sided I'll pay more attention to it.

@Eddy_Winslow

 But why would the line be moving the opposite direction? It has moved from -1.5 to -3 with only 23% of action on Nova.. See where I’m coming from? Im not 100% sure sharp action is the reason for the line move but just a hunch.. Your opinion on it is definitely respected!

@mrusso

 This is correct and I’m assuming the bigger take with less bet percentage (meaning bigger wagers) is from sharp money.. just a hunch but could be wrong 

@mrusso

 75%+ tickets are on Nova.

@JakeWithAJumper

Ok then.

@JakeWithAJumper

 Generally speaking, correct. If 25% of the bets are on one team but 75% of the take is on that same team one might assume there are "sharp bettors" on that side, the bigger bets of course coming from the sharps. I do look at all that but ultimately it comes down to my instincts, "sharps" aren't always right.

@Eddy_Winslow 

 Where are you seeing this? Because everything I am seeing is opposite 

@mrusso

 I agree 100 percent even though in this instance I like the Nova side I believe.. Where did you find the actual money percentage? A lot of sites don’t give you that info unless you pay so was just wondering