I was on UCLA last game,but they played a bad team,tuff to know if a bad team that returns all their players are still going to be bad,sometimes they are just bad players,but most times they get better with a year under their belts,but they were bad last year for sure.
Pepperdine @ UCLA discussion/analysis
I was on UCLA last game,but they played a bad team,tuff to know if a bad team that returns all their players are still going to be bad,sometimes they are just bad players,but most times they get better with a year under their belts,but they were bad last year for sure.
I was on UCLA last game,but they played a bad team,tuff to know if a bad team that returns all their players are still going to be bad,sometimes they are just bad players,but most times they get better with a year under their belts,but they were bad last year for sure.
i never consider going against you just wanted to throw something out here
PEPPERDINE is 4-18 ATS (-15.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
UCLA is 19-3 UNDER (+15.7 Units) after game - where they allowed a shooting pct. of 33% or less since 1997.
good luck tonight
i never consider going against you just wanted to throw something out here
PEPPERDINE is 4-18 ATS (-15.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
UCLA is 19-3 UNDER (+15.7 Units) after game - where they allowed a shooting pct. of 33% or less since 1997.
good luck tonight
Nutty line movement went from 19.5 to 16.5 now back to 18.5.
Mortal lock they win by 17 or 18. Check your tickets!
peperdine is one of RAS plays and that generally means an automatic 3 pt change in opening line ![]()
Nutty line movement went from 19.5 to 16.5 now back to 18.5.
Mortal lock they win by 17 or 18. Check your tickets!
peperdine is one of RAS plays and that generally means an automatic 3 pt change in opening line ![]()
If I were going to play a 1H total I'd be on the OVER as well. UCLA has really pushed the pace offensively this year right out of the gates, and I would not be surprised to see Pepperdine be perfectly fine with running as well. Decent shooting percentages should get that over
And if it doesn't hit, I wont be a douche, and come in and bash your thread..... ![]()
If I were going to play a 1H total I'd be on the OVER as well. UCLA has really pushed the pace offensively this year right out of the gates, and I would not be surprised to see Pepperdine be perfectly fine with running as well. Decent shooting percentages should get that over
And if it doesn't hit, I wont be a douche, and come in and bash your thread..... ![]()
I've seen this play over, and over, and over again with Ben Howland's offense... I somehow deluded myself that this year would be different because we had more offensive talent... but it's really a coaching thing on offense against a zone. He just doesn't know how to scheme to beat it, because he's had a variety of different guys and none of them could put it together.
Very frustrating. VERY frustrating.
Oh... and I took UCLA (1H) UNDER 70.5 at the last minute.
I've seen this play over, and over, and over again with Ben Howland's offense... I somehow deluded myself that this year would be different because we had more offensive talent... but it's really a coaching thing on offense against a zone. He just doesn't know how to scheme to beat it, because he's had a variety of different guys and none of them could put it together.
Very frustrating. VERY frustrating.
Oh... and I took UCLA (1H) UNDER 70.5 at the last minute.
AND NOT WITH FUCKING JERIME ANDERSON
He had at least 3 plays that had me screaming at the television. I can't wait to not have to watch him anymore someday
AND NOT WITH FUCKING JERIME ANDERSON
He had at least 3 plays that had me screaming at the television. I can't wait to not have to watch him anymore someday
No prob Kap. Just one loss. Remember just to fade them next time against a good zone defense. Personally this game has been a game of runs. UCLA could easily have been up 5 going into halftime or better. If UCLA pushes a lead to say 10 with less than a minute they could cover the spread with free throws... that is if they can hit their free throws... LOL!
You're right Jes, I'm just venting... lose the 1H over by 0.5 points, Anderson had at least three mind numbing plays, and UCLA *still* cannot figure out a zone defense. It makes me want to smash things.
No prob Kap. Just one loss. Remember just to fade them next time against a good zone defense. Personally this game has been a game of runs. UCLA could easily have been up 5 going into halftime or better. If UCLA pushes a lead to say 10 with less than a minute they could cover the spread with free throws... that is if they can hit their free throws... LOL!
You're right Jes, I'm just venting... lose the 1H over by 0.5 points, Anderson had at least three mind numbing plays, and UCLA *still* cannot figure out a zone defense. It makes me want to smash things.
UCLA will tighten up the D in the 2nd half. The better home team always does. I've been watching basketball for a while. UCLA played with no defensive intensity whatsoever in the first half. They definitely got chewed out at the half. Vegas doesnt believe the result of the game will be in doubt.
You sure would have to think so, if it's one thing Howland's teams have been able to do its play good defense (at least, historically -- not last year's team!). He tends to be a good 2H coach in terms of making defensive adjustments... I just worry that UCLA will continue to look lost on offense against the zone. I go straight zone if I'm Pepperdine for the 2H
UCLA will tighten up the D in the 2nd half. The better home team always does. I've been watching basketball for a while. UCLA played with no defensive intensity whatsoever in the first half. They definitely got chewed out at the half. Vegas doesnt believe the result of the game will be in doubt.
You sure would have to think so, if it's one thing Howland's teams have been able to do its play good defense (at least, historically -- not last year's team!). He tends to be a good 2H coach in terms of making defensive adjustments... I just worry that UCLA will continue to look lost on offense against the zone. I go straight zone if I'm Pepperdine for the 2H
You're right Jes, I'm just venting... lose the 1H over by 0.5 points, Anderson had at least three mind numbing plays, and UCLA *still* cannot figure out a zone defense. It makes me want to smash things.
Nothing wrong with venting. I have been there many a times. Hell I have been there yesterday even. BOL!
You're right Jes, I'm just venting... lose the 1H over by 0.5 points, Anderson had at least three mind numbing plays, and UCLA *still* cannot figure out a zone defense. It makes me want to smash things.
Nothing wrong with venting. I have been there many a times. Hell I have been there yesterday even. BOL!
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
447,559
-
Tuesday 09/15/2026
648
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
257,344
-
PART DEUX
283
-
Couple Beers
3,827
-
Tuesday
3,122
-
Trump lies so much.
20,685
-
Obviously the true face of the republican party
31,224
-
Another looney Trump comment today.
11,554
-
What damage to America does the traitor and his party plan for the rest of the year.?
25,635
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
