I see a figure closer to that also (56%). DANE's figures reflect ML wagering AND spread (sides) so it is skewed. And I agree with most, -8 ML FAV is away for books to cleanup (esp. since you have to put a larger bankroll to make decent $$$$)
-300 is a disaster waiting to happen.
If Duke were -11 or so, I would say Butler has diminished chances to grab victory from defeat. -8 is VERY possible. Most upsets seem to happen within the -5 to -8 range.
0
Quote Originally Posted by eriffic:
where do you see 85%
i see 56% on butler and 44% on duke.
I see a figure closer to that also (56%). DANE's figures reflect ML wagering AND spread (sides) so it is skewed. And I agree with most, -8 ML FAV is away for books to cleanup (esp. since you have to put a larger bankroll to make decent $$$$)
-300 is a disaster waiting to happen.
If Duke were -11 or so, I would say Butler has diminished chances to grab victory from defeat. -8 is VERY possible. Most upsets seem to happen within the -5 to -8 range.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.