All Forums | College Basketball

Saturday Discussion

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2016
Posts: 27
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 21567
Posted: #1
BetOnline numbers, as always.

Ball St @ Ohio -8 (128)
Hofstra @ Northeastern -5.5 (123)
Marquette @ Villanova +1.5 (150)
St John's @ Duke -19.5 (147)
Wake Forest @ Clemson -11.5 (125.5)
Wofford @ Charleston -6
George Washington @ Fordham +1.5 (129)
West Virginia @ Syracuse -12 (139)
Texas @ Baylor -9 (145)
Buffalo @ Northern Illinois +14 (127)
Arkansas St @ North Texas -5 (128)
Arkansas @ Alabama -9.5 (128)
Mississippi St @ Florida -9.5 (145)

More...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 21567
Posted: #2
Texas Tech @ Missouri -23.5 (138)
Kansas @ Iowa St +7 (141)
Delaware @ Drexel -14 (121)
UNC Wilmington @ Towson +9 (121)
James Madison @ George Mason -11.5 (134)
Middle Tennessee St @ Vanderbilt -9 (127)
Valpariaso @ UW Milwaukee -6 (130)
St Louis @ Massachusetts +3.5 (139)
Western Carolina @ UNC Greensboro -1
Elon @ Appalachian St -6
Virginia Tech @ Maryland +3 (130)
Tulsa @ SMU +2 (118)
Tennessee Tech @ Morehead St +1.5
Wyoming @ Boise St -1.5 (120)

More...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 1031
Posted: #3
Georgetown opening as a dog at Pitt.  I know Woodall is back but Hoyas are really good.  Aztecs only 2 pt favs.....lots of interesting lines.  Monster card
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 21567
Posted: #4
VCU @ Georgia St -1 (116)
San Diego St @ Colorado St +2 (136)
Kentucky @ LSU +10 (129)
William & Mary @ Old Dominion -17 (118)
Miami OH @ Western Michigan -4 (126)
Southern Illinois @ Illinois St -8 (136)
Georgetown @ Pittsburgh -2 (131)
Colorado @ UCLA -8.5 (130)
Oklahoma St @ Texas A&M -5.5 (118)
Purdue @ Northwestern PK (133)
St Joseph's @ Temple -6 (143)
Washington St @ Arizona St PK (133)
Northern Iowa @ Missouri St -2.5 (125)
UL Lafayette @ UL Monroe +7 (126)

More...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 21567
Posted: #5
Davidson @ Samford +11
SIU Edwardsville @ Jacksonville St -13.5
Bowling Green @ Eastern Michigan +4 (112)
TCU @ New Mexico -17 (142)
Cincinnati @ Rutgers PK (125)
Auburn @ Tennessee -8 (115)
North Dakota St @ Oakland -3.5
Cleveland St @ Youngstown St +3 (133)
Butler @ UW Green Bay +1 (122)
Southern Mississippi @ Central Florida -2.5 (125)
Akron @ Central Michigan +5 (136)
Kent St @ Toledo +5.5 (139)
Columbia @ Cornell -2.5 (126)
Washington @ Arizona -4 (138)
South Carolina @ Mississippi -6.5 (124)
Oklahoma @ Kansas St -10.5 (139)
La Salle @ Duquesne -3 (135)
Xavier @ Charlotte +3 (137)
Rhode Island @ Dayton -12.5 (141)
Richmond @ St Bonaventure -4.5 (137)
Furman @ Citadel +7
South Dakota St @ IPFW +5
Western Kentucky @ Florida International -5.5 (129)
Georgia Southern @ Chattanooga -8
Denver @ Arkansas-Little Rock +4 (119)
Louisville @ Seton Hall -1 (133)
East Carolina @ UAB -7.5 (122)
Tulane @ Rice -3 (117)

More...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2369
Posted: #6
Marquette line is interesting to me at first look I see a let down spot for nova in this game,  Also Kansas line is iteresting I thought it would be around 11 myself, Miss St. catching a good amount of points might be worth a look, and I agree with jimmy Gerogetown as a dog? and Aztecs only minus two? might need to jump those lines early.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 21567
Posted: #7
Illinois @ Minnesota -5 (127)
UC Riverside @ UC Irvine PK (127)
UC Santa Barbara @ Pacific +5.5 (130)
Virginia @ NC State -2.5 (122)
UTEP @ Houston +1 (133)
Eastern Kentucky @ Tennessee St -7
Eastern Illinois @ Murray St -17.5
UMKC @ Oral Roberts -20
IUPUI @ Western Illinois -7
Bradley @ Creighton -20 (148)
Tennessee-Martin @ Austin Peay -16
Wichita St @ Drake +8.5 (137)
Marshall @ Memphis -8.5 (132)
St Mary's @ BYU -4 (150)
San Jose St @ Utah St -12 (135)
UNLV @ Air Force +11.5 (132)
Montana St @ Eastern Washington -10.5
Weber St @ Idaho St +7
Fresno St @ New Mexico St -10.5 (142)
South Dakota @ Southern Utah -8
San Diego @ San Francisco -11.5 (148)
Santa Clara @ Pepperdine -3 (132)
Portland @ Loyola Marymount -12.5 (140)
Cal Poly @ UC Davis +13 (123.5)
Northern Arizona @ Sacramento St -3
CS Fullerton @ Long Beach St -13 (149)
Utah @ USC -12 (108)
Hawaii @ Idaho -6 (142)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 136
Posted: #8
BYU favored over St Marys.  Wow.  After cross country travel, no less.  I'm taking St Marys all day long.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 21567
Posted: #9
Huge card to try and break down. Let's get some good discussion going here.

Like SMC there as well. Only concern is how tough the Cougars are at home.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 3277
Posted: #10
Surprised to see Vanderbilt laying that many points. MTSU is 14-1 ATS this year when not favored by more than 13 points.

Pretty square, but I love Tulsa over SMU. Tulsa should have revenge on their minds after letting SMU beat them on their home court off a buzzer beater. Last time they met, Tulsa turned the ball over 17 times and SMU only turned it over 6, and SMU was able to capitalize by outscoring 19-4 off turnovers. Not out of the ordinary for Tulsa to turn it over, but I doubt it happens as much this time around. And Tulsa killed SMU on the glass, outrebounding 33-20. That was the least amount of points Tulsa has put up through 21 games this entire season (55...also tied that w/ Northwestern). Tulsa's defense should hold through again, but I doubt SMU pulls that off.

Also square...but why won't Cleveland State get revenge? Short line there...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 3277
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by lbreno:

BYU favored over St Marys.  Wow.  After cross country travel, no less.  I'm taking St Marys all day long.


count me in
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #12
Hawaii
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2369
Posted: #13

St.Marys almost looks like a trap game in that spot but I do like them as well!

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 825
Posted: #14
Oh...wow the still have the A10 totals to low and the CAA and SEC totals too high....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 3556
Posted: #15
Think Tennessee is ready to pound someone at home, and Auburn in the perfect candidate. Abysmal shooting in the first half by Arkansas was the only reason they stayed in that game the other night.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 943
Posted: #16
Speaking of ready to pound someone..Mizzou might take out some frustration on the ol' Red Raiders..23.5 still isnt' enough...I will be surprised if they don't win by 30+.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 20963
Posted: #17
Don't think SMC is where you guys want to be.

They are walking into a holy war in Provo, travel or not that big win over a power conference team may have them take off...

Maryland getting points is gonna suck me in
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 41
Posted: #18

Is it me or does it seem like Miss State always gets way too many points on the road?? Getting 9.5 from Florida? That should be a nail-biter not a DD win by either team!

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 5555
Posted: #19
VaTech vs Maryland +3
Anybody like Maryland
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 136
Posted: #20

Quote Originally Posted by GWarner27:

Don't think SMC is where you guys want to be.

They are walking into a holy war in Provo, travel or not that big win over a power conference team may have them take off...

Maryland getting points is gonna suck me in
  I didn't consider the God angle and I know it's a huge game for BYU, but they just lost to Loyola Marymount at home last week, and St Mary's is much better than that.  I guess BYU was a 4 point dog at SMC (and lost by 16, so there is revenge) so the line-setters are using an 8 point switch to make BYU the favorite, and it could be a trap, but I'm all in on SMC as a 4 point dog.

Maryland is a nice home dog.  GL. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 8135
Posted: #21
SDSU vs CSU... I might be on Island with my Aztecs here. I know J Fen and Neil both like CSU. What are your thoughts?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 1082
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by hoopsvader:

VaTech vs Maryland +3
Anybody like Maryland

maryland absolutely can't finish a game. if it's close, they'll get run out
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 2398
Posted: #23
BYU coming off a HUGE road win at VT which they had to have since they wont win the WCC.  Wouldn't touch St mary in that spot
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 8135
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by MistakeHitter:

BYU coming off a HUGE road win at VT which they had to have since they wont win the WCC.  Wouldn't touch St mary in that spot

Yeah BYU at home and sky high with confidence.... wouldn't mess with them. One of the better home crowd's in the nation. St. Mary's never plays in buildings like that. Most WCC arenas about 5 K tops... BYU 22,700. 3rd largest in the nation. 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 58
Posted: #25
fighting illini ML
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.