Tonight presents a very good opportunity to play an over set too low if one can look beyond analyzing the game based soley on the points per game scored and points per game allowed of the two teams involved.
Siena / UMass Over 133
Backing an over with a Siena team only averaging 57.6 ppg, and allowing 60.8 ppg would cause most people to hesitate. Furthermore, the highest final total for a game that Siena has played in this year is 126, so it is counter-intuitive to back a total set tonight 7 points higher than their best output of the season. However, tonight’s match-up with UMass is not like any other opponent they’ve played this season.
First, and maybe most important, the tempo. Siena has yet to play an opponent with an adjusted pace rating higher than 67.5 possessions per game (vs Georgia Tech). UMass enters tonight’s game as the 11th fastest team in the country, averaging 72.7 possessions per game – 5.2 faster than anyone Siena has faced to date! I still am not convinced that Vegas has adjusted for the difference that Chaz Williams (Hofstra transfer) has been to this UMass team and the dribble-drive concepts that Coach Kellogg wants his team to run. This is supported by the fact that UMass is averaging +4.6 more possessions per game than last season. In addition to Siena playing opponents that do not play at the speed of a UMass, they’ve also faced some offensively challenged opponents that has had a negative effect on their totals. Three of their eight opponents this season are ranked 303 or worse in adjusted offensive efficiency (equates to less than 0.914 pts per possession).
As for UMass, as noted they want to play fast – and they’ve been successful dictating the pace to every one of their opponents this year. In only 3 of their games have they had less than 70 possessions, and not one of those was lower than 67. Furthermore, they’ve really found their groove the last 3 games totaling 79 possessions vs a Towson team ranked #274 with respect to pace, 76 possession vs Miami (#285), and 75 possessions vs ECU (#215).
Could this go under? Of course it could. Siena could struggle to get to 60 pts due to UMass’s relatively good defense (ranked #61, only allowing 0.942 pts per poss). However, I think Siena will have stretches tonight that they will be more than able to trade points due to facing a team whose style is much faster and free-flowing than anything they’ve yet to see this year. Furthermore, they should be able to get some easy points from the FT line as well as UMass has a very high tendency to foul (26.3% of their opponents points come from the charity stripe).
Good luck if you decide to make a play
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
YTD: 4-1
Tonight presents a very good opportunity to play an over set too low if one can look beyond analyzing the game based soley on the points per game scored and points per game allowed of the two teams involved.
Siena / UMass Over 133
Backing an over with a Siena team only averaging 57.6 ppg, and allowing 60.8 ppg would cause most people to hesitate. Furthermore, the highest final total for a game that Siena has played in this year is 126, so it is counter-intuitive to back a total set tonight 7 points higher than their best output of the season. However, tonight’s match-up with UMass is not like any other opponent they’ve played this season.
First, and maybe most important, the tempo. Siena has yet to play an opponent with an adjusted pace rating higher than 67.5 possessions per game (vs Georgia Tech). UMass enters tonight’s game as the 11th fastest team in the country, averaging 72.7 possessions per game – 5.2 faster than anyone Siena has faced to date! I still am not convinced that Vegas has adjusted for the difference that Chaz Williams (Hofstra transfer) has been to this UMass team and the dribble-drive concepts that Coach Kellogg wants his team to run. This is supported by the fact that UMass is averaging +4.6 more possessions per game than last season. In addition to Siena playing opponents that do not play at the speed of a UMass, they’ve also faced some offensively challenged opponents that has had a negative effect on their totals. Three of their eight opponents this season are ranked 303 or worse in adjusted offensive efficiency (equates to less than 0.914 pts per possession).
As for UMass, as noted they want to play fast – and they’ve been successful dictating the pace to every one of their opponents this year. In only 3 of their games have they had less than 70 possessions, and not one of those was lower than 67. Furthermore, they’ve really found their groove the last 3 games totaling 79 possessions vs a Towson team ranked #274 with respect to pace, 76 possession vs Miami (#285), and 75 possessions vs ECU (#215).
Could this go under? Of course it could. Siena could struggle to get to 60 pts due to UMass’s relatively good defense (ranked #61, only allowing 0.942 pts per poss). However, I think Siena will have stretches tonight that they will be more than able to trade points due to facing a team whose style is much faster and free-flowing than anything they’ve yet to see this year. Furthermore, they should be able to get some easy points from the FT line as well as UMass has a very high tendency to foul (26.3% of their opponents points come from the charity stripe).
I think the refs are getting bags passed to them to call fewer fouls and keep the game under 130 so vegas cashes in. If you dont think that stuff happens. Youre living in space.
What Kind of bags? I got Umass -13 and would like to match it up in a reverse with the over or under Why you like under?
I think the refs are getting bags passed to them to call fewer fouls and keep the game under 130 so vegas cashes in. If you dont think that stuff happens. Youre living in space.
What Kind of bags? I got Umass -13 and would like to match it up in a reverse with the over or under Why you like under?
When I make a post, I try to provide the thought process and reasoning behind my play and why I think there is value at a certain number. I look forward to the debate/discussion that it may generate and welcome differing opinions.
As for the questions about the total at 136, or making a play on UMass...obviously the characteristics I referred to in the write-up would support these plays as well. However, I wouldn't have same conviction I have at the over 133 number.
And this is not to say that the game won't go under either, because it certainly could. However, I think there is more support for the game going over a total that was released too low in my opinion.
Good luck with what you decide
0
Appreciate all the support guys
When I make a post, I try to provide the thought process and reasoning behind my play and why I think there is value at a certain number. I look forward to the debate/discussion that it may generate and welcome differing opinions.
As for the questions about the total at 136, or making a play on UMass...obviously the characteristics I referred to in the write-up would support these plays as well. However, I wouldn't have same conviction I have at the over 133 number.
And this is not to say that the game won't go under either, because it certainly could. However, I think there is more support for the game going over a total that was released too low in my opinion.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.