I'm going to try this system to see how it pays...you know, capping after the game. I hear it's much easier.
Monday morning this and that... The current Duke is not the Duke from 2-3 weeks ago and is also not the rising-fast UNC team. Not trying to salt your wounds, just trying to point out you're looking past plenty of double-digit road dogs that will keep conference games VERY close. Case in point - NC State, Oklahoma etc.
Games tonight where this will be very profitable and will probably cash with ease -- Auburn, Kansas, UVA, PSU
0
Quote Originally Posted by Fballguy:
I'm going to try this system to see how it pays...you know, capping after the game. I hear it's much easier.
Monday morning this and that... The current Duke is not the Duke from 2-3 weeks ago and is also not the rising-fast UNC team. Not trying to salt your wounds, just trying to point out you're looking past plenty of double-digit road dogs that will keep conference games VERY close. Case in point - NC State, Oklahoma etc.
Games tonight where this will be very profitable and will probably cash with ease -- Auburn, Kansas, UVA, PSU
Thanks for the early post Fballguy. I'm a fan but usually miss your picks because I'm not able to check back on forums at the normal times u post. Strong work! And !
0
Thanks for the early post Fballguy. I'm a fan but usually miss your picks because I'm not able to check back on forums at the normal times u post. Strong work! And !
I forgot to mention UC Irvine in my early leans. Liked their match up from the get go...even with Nelson questionable. 7-1 at home...against 1-9 road team. UCI averages a double digit victory at home, while CP averages a double digit loss. UCI far better shooting percentage (45% vs 39%). UCI 8 game winning streak. CP 10 game losing streak. Everyone that CP has lost to, UCI has beaten. How can you pass up -2?
Marshall is a better shooting team across the board and it's not even close...FG (47% vs 37%), FT (73% vs 66%) and 3's (39% vs 24%). Marshall has played a much tougher schedule (rank 115) while UTSA has played one of the easiest in the country (rank 347). Line went up point and a half but I can live with that. I think Marshall wins in a blow out.
NC Wilmington...8-1 on the road vs JMU 4-6 at home. 19-2 overall vs 6-15. UNCW is 8-0 vs conference opponents. JMU without one of their key contributors. That the line is only 10 makes me a little nervous, but I just need them to win.
St. Mary's...Simply put, better team. 11-1 at home with the closest margin of victory being 12. I'll risk the 3.5.
What can go wrong?
Good luck to all!
0
Hoping the favorites show up tonight...
I forgot to mention UC Irvine in my early leans. Liked their match up from the get go...even with Nelson questionable. 7-1 at home...against 1-9 road team. UCI averages a double digit victory at home, while CP averages a double digit loss. UCI far better shooting percentage (45% vs 39%). UCI 8 game winning streak. CP 10 game losing streak. Everyone that CP has lost to, UCI has beaten. How can you pass up -2?
Marshall is a better shooting team across the board and it's not even close...FG (47% vs 37%), FT (73% vs 66%) and 3's (39% vs 24%). Marshall has played a much tougher schedule (rank 115) while UTSA has played one of the easiest in the country (rank 347). Line went up point and a half but I can live with that. I think Marshall wins in a blow out.
NC Wilmington...8-1 on the road vs JMU 4-6 at home. 19-2 overall vs 6-15. UNCW is 8-0 vs conference opponents. JMU without one of their key contributors. That the line is only 10 makes me a little nervous, but I just need them to win.
St. Mary's...Simply put, better team. 11-1 at home with the closest margin of victory being 12. I'll risk the 3.5.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
