I'm 1-0 on my huge college basketball plays this season. I have another one going tonight:
San Francisco +14 I think this line is a joke. The Dons beat Gonzaga once this year and lost by 17 on the road. However, the big loss is a little deceiving because the game was close until San Fran went ice cold in the final 10 minutes of the game. I know the Zags are playing much better of late but I still think they overrated, especially by the oddsmakers. I will gladly take 14 points in a tournament game with a very good San Fran team that I think matches up well with Gonzaga. I see a tight contest here.
Good Luck Everyone
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I'm 1-0 on my huge college basketball plays this season. I have another one going tonight:
San Francisco +14 I think this line is a joke. The Dons beat Gonzaga once this year and lost by 17 on the road. However, the big loss is a little deceiving because the game was close until San Fran went ice cold in the final 10 minutes of the game. I know the Zags are playing much better of late but I still think they overrated, especially by the oddsmakers. I will gladly take 14 points in a tournament game with a very good San Fran team that I think matches up well with Gonzaga. I see a tight contest here.
I remember that game because I was on San Fran. I also lean over 137 here because it looks like the books have over adjusted this total down based on the last game. They only shot a combined 18 FT's in the last game when these teams average around 20+ apiece per game all season. And San Fran had one of their worst shooting %'s of the year in that game, around 37%. Gonzaga certainly played with more emotion last time, after they were upset by SF the game before in overtime in SF.
Take a look at all the other games in this conf tourney so far....TONS of FT's in all the games so obviously the officials are calling these games tight. In fact every game has gone over 137 except for the SF/Pepp game, which was mainly because Pepp is horrible and only shot 30% from the field. Keep in mind Gonz is one of the best FT shooting teams in the conference too.
In some ways the over gives you a little insurance against SF not covering the line, in case Gonzaga comes out and shoots lights out much like Ohio St did to Wisky today.
BOL to us!
0
Like the play.
I remember that game because I was on San Fran. I also lean over 137 here because it looks like the books have over adjusted this total down based on the last game. They only shot a combined 18 FT's in the last game when these teams average around 20+ apiece per game all season. And San Fran had one of their worst shooting %'s of the year in that game, around 37%. Gonzaga certainly played with more emotion last time, after they were upset by SF the game before in overtime in SF.
Take a look at all the other games in this conf tourney so far....TONS of FT's in all the games so obviously the officials are calling these games tight. In fact every game has gone over 137 except for the SF/Pepp game, which was mainly because Pepp is horrible and only shot 30% from the field. Keep in mind Gonz is one of the best FT shooting teams in the conference too.
In some ways the over gives you a little insurance against SF not covering the line, in case Gonzaga comes out and shoots lights out much like Ohio St did to Wisky today.
I feel like I should really like San Francisco in this spot, but I just don't. Gonzaga owns this conference and beat San Fran by 17 just recently and they didn't even play well. Good luck to San Fran backers, I just can't pull the trigger.
0
I feel like I should really like San Francisco in this spot, but I just don't. Gonzaga owns this conference and beat San Fran by 17 just recently and they didn't even play well. Good luck to San Fran backers, I just can't pull the trigger.
and that is exactly what vegas expects and wants from everybody on san fran ... don't do it ... =D
Do you really think that "VEGAS" really gives a #(&^ about SF bettors and how they might wager in the 2nd half???? Really??? Are you that naive and a conspiracy theorist???
C'MON MAN!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by tomsan73761:
and that is exactly what vegas expects and wants from everybody on san fran ... don't do it ... =D
Do you really think that "VEGAS" really gives a #(&^ about SF bettors and how they might wager in the 2nd half???? Really??? Are you that naive and a conspiracy theorist???
Do you really think that "VEGAS" really gives a #(&^ about SF bettors and how they might wager in the 2nd half???? Really??? Are you that naive and a conspiracy theorist???
C'MON MAN!!!
depends on how much money is coming in ... of course they give a shit
0
Quote Originally Posted by Marketmaker:
Do you really think that "VEGAS" really gives a #(&^ about SF bettors and how they might wager in the 2nd half???? Really??? Are you that naive and a conspiracy theorist???
C'MON MAN!!!
depends on how much money is coming in ... of course they give a shit
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.