Good Luck gtnp..Yeah all I see is Play of Year, Locks and all that BS for Michigan..I think people are giving them to much credit..If it wasn't for a lucky ass shot they wouldn't of even beat Houston..That's been there, toughest task..I personally think they get smoked by 12-15..We will see..
Good Luck gtnp..Yeah all I see is Play of Year, Locks and all that BS for Michigan..I think people are giving them to much credit..If it wasn't for a lucky ass shot they wouldn't of even beat Houston..That's been there, toughest task..I personally think they get smoked by 12-15..We will see..
Good Luck gtnp..Yeah all I see is Play of Year, Locks and all that BS for Michigan..I think people are giving them to much credit..If it wasn't for a lucky behind shot they wouldn't of even beat Houston..That's been there, toughest task..I personally think they get smoked by 12-15..We will see..
Good Luck gtnp..Yeah all I see is Play of Year, Locks and all that BS for Michigan..I think people are giving them to much credit..If it wasn't for a lucky behind shot they wouldn't of even beat Houston..That's been there, toughest task..I personally think they get smoked by 12-15..We will see..
The betting market sets the line. You are correct, people would’ve pounded nova at -2 and that’s why it’s not -2. Not so sure about this angle. Yes, when books take huge money on nova, they widen the spread to lure Michigan bettors. If you think the spread should be -2, then you are getting 5 points of value on Michigan because everyone’s pounding nova lol. That’s called sound logic.
The betting market sets the line. You are correct, people would’ve pounded nova at -2 and that’s why it’s not -2. Not so sure about this angle. Yes, when books take huge money on nova, they widen the spread to lure Michigan bettors. If you think the spread should be -2, then you are getting 5 points of value on Michigan because everyone’s pounding nova lol. That’s called sound logic.
The betting market sets the line. You are correct, people would’ve pounded nova at -2 and that’s why it’s not -2. Not so sure about this angle. Yes, when books take huge money on nova, they widen the spread to lure Michigan bettors. If you think the spread should be -2, then you are getting 5 points of value on Michigan because everyone’s pounding nova lol. That’s called sound logic.
The betting market sets the line. You are correct, people would’ve pounded nova at -2 and that’s why it’s not -2. Not so sure about this angle. Yes, when books take huge money on nova, they widen the spread to lure Michigan bettors. If you think the spread should be -2, then you are getting 5 points of value on Michigan because everyone’s pounding nova lol. That’s called sound logic.
I get you are saying the books are trying to lure Michigan bettors because they feel it will be a blowout. But the books aren’t always picking sides. If they are setting a line to get 50/50 action and you believe the line should be 2 points, you are getting a boat load of value at 7.
I get you are saying the books are trying to lure Michigan bettors because they feel it will be a blowout. But the books aren’t always picking sides. If they are setting a line to get 50/50 action and you believe the line should be 2 points, you are getting a boat load of value at 7.
I get you are saying the books are trying to lure Michigan bettors because they feel it will be a blowout. But the books aren’t always picking sides. If they are setting a line to get 50/50 action and you believe the line should be 2 points, you are getting a boat load of value at 7.
I get you are saying the books are trying to lure Michigan bettors because they feel it will be a blowout. But the books aren’t always picking sides. If they are setting a line to get 50/50 action and you believe the line should be 2 points, you are getting a boat load of value at 7.
Same boat, i am on parlay Astro ML+ Nova ML
BOL
Same boat, i am on parlay Astro ML+ Nova ML
BOL
i know and that does scare me lol. But I walk into my office and have to hear co workers who do not watch Bball tell me nova will be up 12 by half. 60% of public is still high as well. I think Michigan has to play nearly perfect to win. But like their toughness, they’re battle tested, and can get hot. Thinking it’ll be tight
i know and that does scare me lol. But I walk into my office and have to hear co workers who do not watch Bball tell me nova will be up 12 by half. 60% of public is still high as well. I think Michigan has to play nearly perfect to win. But like their toughness, they’re battle tested, and can get hot. Thinking it’ll be tight
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.