17 Bowls played coming into today. 1H Unders are 8-8-1 (note in first 7 games it was 2-5, it has picked up steam though going 6-3-1 in last 10 and 4-1 in last 5).
Of the 8 games that lost the 1H Under, the 2H Unders are 6-2. One of those losses was MTSU/Ark St, some people got the 1H line at 31.5 (it dropped to 30.5, some may have got it at 31) which was a winner as it landed 31. The other loss in the 2H was the Army/SDSU game, which was a 2H Under 24.5 and it was sitting at 21 pts with under a minute left Army with a 3rd and 17 or something with no timeouts and they converted and then got the TD, the 2 pt conversion, and finally a pick 6.
But going with Roggs listed lines the math works out to.
1H 8 wins x 1.0 units - 1H 8 losses x 1.1 Units = -0.8 units (1 push = refund)
2H (6 wins x 2.0 units) - 2H (2 losses x 2.2 Units) = + 7.6 units
Total: + 6.8 units
That is assuming you bet all of them and kept good money management and also assuming you didn't try and get juice back on 1H losses. Check the math but I believe that is pretty accurate.
Also if someone has all the 2H lines (even the ones not played with the system) I can look at the some general trends there.
Are you counting this as the push? For the posted lines in the thread, Roggs had 30.5 which is a loss, and the second half was a loss as well, which would put the official record at +3.5 units
0
Quote Originally Posted by JBone_Texas:
Here is a quick run down:
17 Bowls played coming into today. 1H Unders are 8-8-1 (note in first 7 games it was 2-5, it has picked up steam though going 6-3-1 in last 10 and 4-1 in last 5).
Of the 8 games that lost the 1H Under, the 2H Unders are 6-2. One of those losses was MTSU/Ark St, some people got the 1H line at 31.5 (it dropped to 30.5, some may have got it at 31) which was a winner as it landed 31. The other loss in the 2H was the Army/SDSU game, which was a 2H Under 24.5 and it was sitting at 21 pts with under a minute left Army with a 3rd and 17 or something with no timeouts and they converted and then got the TD, the 2 pt conversion, and finally a pick 6.
But going with Roggs listed lines the math works out to.
1H 8 wins x 1.0 units - 1H 8 losses x 1.1 Units = -0.8 units (1 push = refund)
2H (6 wins x 2.0 units) - 2H (2 losses x 2.2 Units) = + 7.6 units
Total: + 6.8 units
That is assuming you bet all of them and kept good money management and also assuming you didn't try and get juice back on 1H losses. Check the math but I believe that is pretty accurate.
Also if someone has all the 2H lines (even the ones not played with the system) I can look at the some general trends there.
Are you counting this as the push? For the posted lines in the thread, Roggs had 30.5 which is a loss, and the second half was a loss as well, which would put the official record at +3.5 units
There are a rash of players not playing for Texas, sometimes we don't always know the significance so I'll try to enlighten you. Texas offense is not very good to begin with but they will be missing 2 of 3 RBs (wCarter suspended and Warren III transfering, Daniel Young lead the RBs with 325 yards, Warren was 2nd with 314 and also led RBs with 6 TDs, and Toneil Carter had 252 yrd rushing and 3 TDs). The rushing yard leader (364) on the team is Sam Ehlinger...QB. He isn't starting this one, Shane Buechele is. He is the better passer but he will be missing leading WR Lil' Jordan Humphrey who had 38 catches for 439 yards. Also missing both TEs (not used much in the passing game) Cade Brewer and Garrett Gray as well as their best OL Connor Williams. They do get OL Elijah Rodriquez back but the line was not very good and Williams is likley a 1st round draft pick.
Rather than list all the defensive players, I'll just say 3 of the top 4 leading tacklers including the defensive team leader LB Malik Jefferson are out and all told the defenders not playing represent between 27 to 53% of the teams tackles, tackles for loss, sacks, INTs, and passes defended. FYI.
0
Just a few notes on the Tex/Mizzou game.
There are a rash of players not playing for Texas, sometimes we don't always know the significance so I'll try to enlighten you. Texas offense is not very good to begin with but they will be missing 2 of 3 RBs (wCarter suspended and Warren III transfering, Daniel Young lead the RBs with 325 yards, Warren was 2nd with 314 and also led RBs with 6 TDs, and Toneil Carter had 252 yrd rushing and 3 TDs). The rushing yard leader (364) on the team is Sam Ehlinger...QB. He isn't starting this one, Shane Buechele is. He is the better passer but he will be missing leading WR Lil' Jordan Humphrey who had 38 catches for 439 yards. Also missing both TEs (not used much in the passing game) Cade Brewer and Garrett Gray as well as their best OL Connor Williams. They do get OL Elijah Rodriquez back but the line was not very good and Williams is likley a 1st round draft pick.
Rather than list all the defensive players, I'll just say 3 of the top 4 leading tacklers including the defensive team leader LB Malik Jefferson are out and all told the defenders not playing represent between 27 to 53% of the teams tackles, tackles for loss, sacks, INTs, and passes defended. FYI.
QUOTE Originally Posted by JBone_Texas: Here is a quick run down: 17 Bowls played coming into today. 1H Unders are 8-8-1 (note in first 7 games it was 2-5, it has picked up steam though going 6-3-1 in last 10 and 4-1 in last 5). Of the 8 games that lost the 1H Under, the 2H Unders are 6-2. One of those losses was MTSU/Ark St, some people got the 1H line at 31.5 (it dropped to 30.5, some may have got it at 31) which was a winner as it landed 31. The other loss in the 2H was the Army/SDSU game, which was a 2H Under 24.5 and it was sitting at 21 pts with under a minute left Army with a 3rd and 17 or something with no timeouts and they converted and then got the TD, the 2 pt conversion, and finally a pick 6. But going with Roggs listed lines the math works out to. 1H 8 wins x 1.0 units - 1H 8 losses x 1.1 Units = -0.8 units (1 push = refund) 2H (6 wins x 2.0 units) - 2H (2 losses x 2.2 Units) = + 7.6 units Total: + 6.8 units That is assuming you bet all of them and kept good money management and also assuming you didn't try and get juice back on 1H losses. Check the math but I believe that is pretty accurate. Also if someone has all the 2H lines (even the ones not played with the system) I can look at the some general trends there. Are you counting this as the push? For the posted lines in the thread, Roggs had 30.5 which is a loss, and the second half was a loss as well, which would put the official record at +3.5 units
No that is a loss. The push was the 1H of the UAB/Ohio game at 30.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HarryKnutsak:
QUOTE Originally Posted by JBone_Texas: Here is a quick run down: 17 Bowls played coming into today. 1H Unders are 8-8-1 (note in first 7 games it was 2-5, it has picked up steam though going 6-3-1 in last 10 and 4-1 in last 5). Of the 8 games that lost the 1H Under, the 2H Unders are 6-2. One of those losses was MTSU/Ark St, some people got the 1H line at 31.5 (it dropped to 30.5, some may have got it at 31) which was a winner as it landed 31. The other loss in the 2H was the Army/SDSU game, which was a 2H Under 24.5 and it was sitting at 21 pts with under a minute left Army with a 3rd and 17 or something with no timeouts and they converted and then got the TD, the 2 pt conversion, and finally a pick 6. But going with Roggs listed lines the math works out to. 1H 8 wins x 1.0 units - 1H 8 losses x 1.1 Units = -0.8 units (1 push = refund) 2H (6 wins x 2.0 units) - 2H (2 losses x 2.2 Units) = + 7.6 units Total: + 6.8 units That is assuming you bet all of them and kept good money management and also assuming you didn't try and get juice back on 1H losses. Check the math but I believe that is pretty accurate. Also if someone has all the 2H lines (even the ones not played with the system) I can look at the some general trends there. Are you counting this as the push? For the posted lines in the thread, Roggs had 30.5 which is a loss, and the second half was a loss as well, which would put the official record at +3.5 units
No that is a loss. The push was the 1H of the UAB/Ohio game at 30.
that first half was comical... here comes the second close your eyes play of the day.... turnover.. unsportsmanlike penalty... a kick return... and a circus tipped td.... gotta love bowl season
0
that first half was comical... here comes the second close your eyes play of the day.... turnover.. unsportsmanlike penalty... a kick return... and a circus tipped td.... gotta love bowl season
Roggs - difference is that neither of these teams are actually potent offensively like FSU was in the first game. 2h under will be fine unless it's crazy low. Plus the field is getting slicker and harder. It's already causing issues and will just get worse.
0
Roggs - difference is that neither of these teams are actually potent offensively like FSU was in the first game. 2h under will be fine unless it's crazy low. Plus the field is getting slicker and harder. It's already causing issues and will just get worse.
Roggs - difference is that neither of these teams are actually potent offensively like FSU was in the first game. 2h under will be fine unless it's crazy low. Plus the field is getting slicker and harder. It's already causing issues and will just get worse.
prepare yourself this 2nd half total is going to be low... iowa is averaging 1.7 yards per play... absolutely attrocious...
0
Quote Originally Posted by JudgeBaylor:
Roggs - difference is that neither of these teams are actually potent offensively like FSU was in the first game. 2h under will be fine unless it's crazy low. Plus the field is getting slicker and harder. It's already causing issues and will just get worse.
prepare yourself this 2nd half total is going to be low... iowa is averaging 1.7 yards per play... absolutely attrocious...
Guys heres a heads up just like fla st game... this total is going to open and should drop fast... if it is 23 or higher i dont care what number it is lock it in as fast as you can... if its 21.5 lock asap... I can not even post fast enough sometimes... go back and read my long write up -this is a game your going to need to act fast
0
Guys heres a heads up just like fla st game... this total is going to open and should drop fast... if it is 23 or higher i dont care what number it is lock it in as fast as you can... if its 21.5 lock asap... I can not even post fast enough sometimes... go back and read my long write up -this is a game your going to need to act fast
Iowa looked lacking to close the half. BC's defense seemed to get the hang of things, too.
What's up with the field conditions? It just looks cold AF.
the field is frozen... defenders slipping and can not plant on cuts... announcers been talking about it for last 90 minutes... closing our eyes for all special teams plays...
0
Quote Originally Posted by thekoreanmang:
Iowa looked lacking to close the half. BC's defense seemed to get the hang of things, too.
What's up with the field conditions? It just looks cold AF.
the field is frozen... defenders slipping and can not plant on cuts... announcers been talking about it for last 90 minutes... closing our eyes for all special teams plays...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.