Here is a quick run down: 17 Bowls played coming into today. 1H Unders are 8-8-1 (note in first 7 games it was 2-5, it has picked up steam though going 6-3-1 in last 10 and 4-1 in last 5). Of the 8 games that lost the 1H Under, the 2H Unders are 6-2. One of those losses was MTSU/Ark St, some people got the 1H line at 31.5 (it dropped to 30.5, some may have got it at 31) which was a winner as it landed 31. The other loss in the 2H was the Army/SDSU game, which was a 2H Under 24.5 and it was sitting at 21 pts with under a minute left Army with a 3rd and 17 or something with no timeouts and they converted and then got the TD, the 2 pt conversion, and finally a pick 6. But going with Roggs listed lines the math works out to. 1H 8 wins x 1.0 units - 1H 8 losses x 1.1 Units = -0.8 units (1 push = refund) 2H (6 wins x 2.0 units) - 2H (2 losses x 2.2 Units) = + 7.6 units Total: + 6.8 units That is assuming you bet all of them and kept good money management and also assuming you didn't try and get juice back on 1H losses. Check the math but I believe that is pretty accurate. Also if someone has all the 2H lines (even the ones not played with the system) I can look at the some general trends there.
Thanks for all that. My recollection is that last bowl season was heavily weighted toward the 2H unders, as well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JBone_Texas:
Here is a quick run down: 17 Bowls played coming into today. 1H Unders are 8-8-1 (note in first 7 games it was 2-5, it has picked up steam though going 6-3-1 in last 10 and 4-1 in last 5). Of the 8 games that lost the 1H Under, the 2H Unders are 6-2. One of those losses was MTSU/Ark St, some people got the 1H line at 31.5 (it dropped to 30.5, some may have got it at 31) which was a winner as it landed 31. The other loss in the 2H was the Army/SDSU game, which was a 2H Under 24.5 and it was sitting at 21 pts with under a minute left Army with a 3rd and 17 or something with no timeouts and they converted and then got the TD, the 2 pt conversion, and finally a pick 6. But going with Roggs listed lines the math works out to. 1H 8 wins x 1.0 units - 1H 8 losses x 1.1 Units = -0.8 units (1 push = refund) 2H (6 wins x 2.0 units) - 2H (2 losses x 2.2 Units) = + 7.6 units Total: + 6.8 units That is assuming you bet all of them and kept good money management and also assuming you didn't try and get juice back on 1H losses. Check the math but I believe that is pretty accurate. Also if someone has all the 2H lines (even the ones not played with the system) I can look at the some general trends there.
Thanks for all that. My recollection is that last bowl season was heavily weighted toward the 2H unders, as well.
damn that Southern Miss turnover really killed. Idk how this Southern Miss offense gets in the end zone again today unless they are handed another TD like the opening drive by FSU committing stupid penalties
0
damn that Southern Miss turnover really killed. Idk how this Southern Miss offense gets in the end zone again today unless they are handed another TD like the opening drive by FSU committing stupid penalties
Not Roggs but my 2 cents is that 23 is ok (23.5 just gives you a win if it lands 23 instead of a push), myself I would be hesistant at 22.5. Judgement call there.
0
Not Roggs but my 2 cents is that 23 is ok (23.5 just gives you a win if it lands 23 instead of a push), myself I would be hesistant at 22.5. Judgement call there.
Not Roggs but my 2 cents is that 23 is ok (23.5 just gives you a win if it lands 23 instead of a push), myself I would be hesistant at 22.5. Judgement call there.
Got it,thanks
I am on under 2H for 0.5u 23
0
Quote Originally Posted by JBone_Texas:
Not Roggs but my 2 cents is that 23 is ok (23.5 just gives you a win if it lands 23 instead of a push), myself I would be hesistant at 22.5. Judgement call there.
QUOTE Originally Posted by JBone_Texas: Not Roggs but my 2 cents is that 23 is ok (23.5 just gives you a win if it lands 23 instead of a push), myself I would be hesistant at 22.5. Judgement call there. Got it,thanks I am on under 2H for 0.5u 23
A ways back in the posts Roggs posted a long explaination of the key haltime (both 1st and 2nd) numbers. 21 and 24 are keys but there are several ways to get to 23 also including the conventional 14 TDs (w/ XP) and 3 FGs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Vickythong1982:
QUOTE Originally Posted by JBone_Texas: Not Roggs but my 2 cents is that 23 is ok (23.5 just gives you a win if it lands 23 instead of a push), myself I would be hesistant at 22.5. Judgement call there. Got it,thanks I am on under 2H for 0.5u 23
A ways back in the posts Roggs posted a long explaination of the key haltime (both 1st and 2nd) numbers. 21 and 24 are keys but there are several ways to get to 23 also including the conventional 14 TDs (w/ XP) and 3 FGs.
A ways back in the posts Roggs posted a long explaination of the key haltime (both 1st and 2nd) numbers. 21 and 24 are keys but there are several ways to get to 23 also including the conventional 14 TDs (w/ XP) and 3 FGs.
Jbone you hit nail on head 23 ok not 22.5
0
Quote Originally Posted by JBone_Texas:
A ways back in the posts Roggs posted a long explaination of the key haltime (both 1st and 2nd) numbers. 21 and 24 are keys but there are several ways to get to 23 also including the conventional 14 TDs (w/ XP) and 3 FGs.
This whole game was not good from the start. all the mishaps benefited the over.Oh well back to ground zero. I started yesterday so I am somewhat ok. Had it in my hands for a quick second. GL all
You mean like the three missed extra points? The only issue in this one is the So Miss coach trying to get back in the game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wil168:
This whole game was not good from the start. all the mishaps benefited the over.Oh well back to ground zero. I started yesterday so I am somewhat ok. Had it in my hands for a quick second. GL all
You mean like the three missed extra points? The only issue in this one is the So Miss coach trying to get back in the game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.