2018 Bowl Under system... 37 - 3 in 2017... Lets Do it Again!
OK, assuming you got the MTSU line before it dropped, 1st halfs (1u) are now 8-12-1 for -5.2...2nd halfs (2u) now 9-3, +11.4. If you didn't catch the MTSU line 2Hs are 8-4, +7.2. So far you've risked 48 units over 20 games to win either 6.2u or 2u. I'm glad you're all plus to this point, but this is a far more accurate representation of the system than "17-3-1 or 16-4-1." You get far more "wins" than you get dollars.
Would be interested in seeing 1h o/u record for last bowl season. Also, it seems like the over is hitting in the first half on an increasing basis as we get further into bowl season. Better teams with better offenses as we get closer to the CFP?
If the 1h over is hitting on a 60% clip, it seems like it makes sense to bet the first half over and if it hits turn around and bet the 2h under.
Thoughts?
OK, assuming you got the MTSU line before it dropped, 1st halfs (1u) are now 8-12-1 for -5.2...2nd halfs (2u) now 9-3, +11.4. If you didn't catch the MTSU line 2Hs are 8-4, +7.2. So far you've risked 48 units over 20 games to win either 6.2u or 2u. I'm glad you're all plus to this point, but this is a far more accurate representation of the system than "17-3-1 or 16-4-1." You get far more "wins" than you get dollars.
Would be interested in seeing 1h o/u record for last bowl season. Also, it seems like the over is hitting in the first half on an increasing basis as we get further into bowl season. Better teams with better offenses as we get closer to the CFP?
If the 1h over is hitting on a 60% clip, it seems like it makes sense to bet the first half over and if it hits turn around and bet the 2h under.
Thoughts?
Also, I would not bet any under in a game involving Oklahoma State. If they're on they could score 31 in the first half by themselves. As a Big 12 fan, I've seen it and won on it alot.
Also, I would not bet any under in a game involving Oklahoma State. If they're on they could score 31 in the first half by themselves. As a Big 12 fan, I've seen it and won on it alot.
Also, I would not bet any under in a game involving Oklahoma State. If they're on they could score 31 in the first half by themselves. As a Big 12 fan, I've seen it and won on it alot.
Also, I would not bet any under in a game involving Oklahoma State. If they're on they could score 31 in the first half by themselves. As a Big 12 fan, I've seen it and won on it alot.
QUOTE Originally Posted by garbagetime: OK, assuming you got the MTSU line before it dropped, 1st halfs (1u) are now 8-12-1 for -5.2...2nd halfs (2u) now 9-3, +11.4. If you didn't catch the MTSU line 2Hs are 8-4, +7.2. So far you've risked 48 units over 20 games to win either 6.2u or 2u. I'm glad you're all plus to this point, but this is a far more accurate representation of the system than "17-3-1 or 16-4-1." You get far more "wins" than you get dollars. Couple things to point out... - I have pointed out probably 100 times a loss is -3.3 units... - Also the amount of units risked comment is absolutely hilarious - Ive said another 100 times we are using bankroll management... Do you know how many people are on this forum today and also looking at other sites for "max plays of the year" "bowl games of the year" etc? That absolutely bury people... What about the guys who go 5 units on some plays and 1 unit on others? - Outside of the New Years 6 Bowls games not a single person knows the motivation of these kids... The games mean nothing... I mean if people do not like it wager .2 units and .4 units I do not care... - In saying all this thought lets use your math:Instead of saying the system is 57 - 6 the last two bowl season - I will say its 57 - 19.8? +37.2 units - is that better?
I said "units risked" based on what you guys are doing...1.1 risked on the 1st half unders, 2.2 risked on the second if the first half loses. It adds up to 48 risked.
QUOTE Originally Posted by garbagetime: OK, assuming you got the MTSU line before it dropped, 1st halfs (1u) are now 8-12-1 for -5.2...2nd halfs (2u) now 9-3, +11.4. If you didn't catch the MTSU line 2Hs are 8-4, +7.2. So far you've risked 48 units over 20 games to win either 6.2u or 2u. I'm glad you're all plus to this point, but this is a far more accurate representation of the system than "17-3-1 or 16-4-1." You get far more "wins" than you get dollars. Couple things to point out... - I have pointed out probably 100 times a loss is -3.3 units... - Also the amount of units risked comment is absolutely hilarious - Ive said another 100 times we are using bankroll management... Do you know how many people are on this forum today and also looking at other sites for "max plays of the year" "bowl games of the year" etc? That absolutely bury people... What about the guys who go 5 units on some plays and 1 unit on others? - Outside of the New Years 6 Bowls games not a single person knows the motivation of these kids... The games mean nothing... I mean if people do not like it wager .2 units and .4 units I do not care... - In saying all this thought lets use your math:Instead of saying the system is 57 - 6 the last two bowl season - I will say its 57 - 19.8? +37.2 units - is that better?
I said "units risked" based on what you guys are doing...1.1 risked on the 1st half unders, 2.2 risked on the second if the first half loses. It adds up to 48 risked.
QUOTE Originally Posted by garbagetime: OK, assuming you got the MTSU line before it dropped, 1st halfs (1u) are now 8-12-1 for -5.2...2nd halfs (2u) now 9-3, +11.4. If you didn't catch the MTSU line 2Hs are 8-4, +7.2. So far you've risked 48 units over 20 games to win either 6.2u or 2u. I'm glad you're all plus to this point, but this is a far more accurate representation of the system than "17-3-1 or 16-4-1." You get far more "wins" than you get dollars. Would be interested in seeing 1h o/u record for last bowl season. Also, it seems like the over is hitting in the first half on an increasing basis as we get further into bowl season. Better teams with better offenses as we get closer to the CFP? If the 1h over is hitting on a 60% clip, it seems like it makes sense to bet the first half over and if it hits turn around and bet the 2h under. Thoughts?
I wouldn't be inclined to bet first half overs blindly...I would imagine by the end of the bowl season it'll be close to 50-50. I also think that as we go further into the bowl schedule you should see less scoring, not more, as the better teams have better defenses and they are more experienced against other good offenses.
QUOTE Originally Posted by garbagetime: OK, assuming you got the MTSU line before it dropped, 1st halfs (1u) are now 8-12-1 for -5.2...2nd halfs (2u) now 9-3, +11.4. If you didn't catch the MTSU line 2Hs are 8-4, +7.2. So far you've risked 48 units over 20 games to win either 6.2u or 2u. I'm glad you're all plus to this point, but this is a far more accurate representation of the system than "17-3-1 or 16-4-1." You get far more "wins" than you get dollars. Would be interested in seeing 1h o/u record for last bowl season. Also, it seems like the over is hitting in the first half on an increasing basis as we get further into bowl season. Better teams with better offenses as we get closer to the CFP? If the 1h over is hitting on a 60% clip, it seems like it makes sense to bet the first half over and if it hits turn around and bet the 2h under. Thoughts?
I wouldn't be inclined to bet first half overs blindly...I would imagine by the end of the bowl season it'll be close to 50-50. I also think that as we go further into the bowl schedule you should see less scoring, not more, as the better teams have better defenses and they are more experienced against other good offenses.
Jbone - seems like you have been the most active here... I literally have a meeting right at 2pm today and will not be able to post a second half move if we need to in game 1...I think enough guys understand the key line moves... waiting or not waiting etc... I will be back for the later games... Thanks guys!
No problem, got it.
Jbone - seems like you have been the most active here... I literally have a meeting right at 2pm today and will not be able to post a second half move if we need to in game 1...I think enough guys understand the key line moves... waiting or not waiting etc... I will be back for the later games... Thanks guys!
No problem, got it.
Navy looks like they could cover the 2H over all by themselves.
And, the 2H UNDER is getting hammered on my book.
First it was 63.5... then 59.5... now it's 57.5!!! That's a full TD move!
Maybe VA is going to forfeit the game.
Navy looks like they could cover the 2H over all by themselves.
And, the 2H UNDER is getting hammered on my book.
First it was 63.5... then 59.5... now it's 57.5!!! That's a full TD move!
Maybe VA is going to forfeit the game.
3 - 1 today... man I hate losing that first one... but uphill battle and we mostst of it back... System is:16 - 4 - 1or 17- 3 - 1 depending on that mtsu game line you gotCatch everyone tomorrow... 2 locked in so faruva under 27okie st under 31.5
Im going to play some unders with you today.
I see the records above and am wondering if a loss counts as -3 Units?
THNX
3 - 1 today... man I hate losing that first one... but uphill battle and we mostst of it back... System is:16 - 4 - 1or 17- 3 - 1 depending on that mtsu game line you gotCatch everyone tomorrow... 2 locked in so faruva under 27okie st under 31.5
Im going to play some unders with you today.
I see the records above and am wondering if a loss counts as -3 Units?
THNX
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,014
-
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
301,802
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
253,448
-
Patriots vs Seahawks in-game live season kickoff
1,444
-
Thursday 09/10/2026
864
-
PART TROIS
283
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
95,231
-
9/10 Fast Cash Five 💰??🔥
3,399
-
9/9 🫣🫣🔥🔥🔥
4,829
-
PART DEUX
350
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
