Posting from a phone in this new format is a little painful.
I just bumped the UConn +24 -105 portion of that game to 1u overall (also have UCF -16.5 for 0.75u). Will update the full card tonight.
Posting from a phone in this new format is a little painful.
I just bumped the UConn +24 -105 portion of that game to 1u overall (also have UCF -16.5 for 0.75u). Will update the full card tonight.
My early offshore limits are now so low that I decided not to list units. I was so disgusted by the low limits that I planned an extended Labor Day trip to a state with legal sportsbooks. Some things have come up since then and I’m unfortunately having to cancel my trip. The offshore limits will go up some on game day or the day before and I’ll add to many of these plays then and list the units.
My early offshore limits are now so low that I decided not to list units. I was so disgusted by the low limits that I planned an extended Labor Day trip to a state with legal sportsbooks. Some things have come up since then and I’m unfortunately having to cancel my trip. The offshore limits will go up some on game day or the day before and I’ll add to many of these plays then and list the units.
I could not resist a week 1 lottery ticket:
4 team UDML parlay
Tulane ML, Florida Atlantic ML, Middle Tennessee ML, Villanova ML
Risking 0.1u to win 44.5u.
I could not resist a week 1 lottery ticket:
4 team UDML parlay
Tulane ML, Florida Atlantic ML, Middle Tennessee ML, Villanova ML
Risking 0.1u to win 44.5u.
U of I vs Kent state under 55 1/2. Any thoughts? Both teams were bad offensivly last year but both teams have switched OCs but kept decent defenses. Lovie smith doesnt really score points. I think both teams have a hard time getting started week 1.
U of I vs Kent state under 55 1/2. Any thoughts? Both teams were bad offensivly last year but both teams have switched OCs but kept decent defenses. Lovie smith doesnt really score points. I think both teams have a hard time getting started week 1.
Black_42, I’m a coach’s son, so I tend to look at the impact of new coaches and what they’re trying to do. You’ve made it this far to realize there’s new coaches, but take the next step and look up Syracuse and Arizona adjusted pace of play and possessions per game. It very well could stay Under being week 1 and needing some time to implement these new systems. Personally, I’m staying away. Good luck if you decide to make a play.
Black_42, I’m a coach’s son, so I tend to look at the impact of new coaches and what they’re trying to do. You’ve made it this far to realize there’s new coaches, but take the next step and look up Syracuse and Arizona adjusted pace of play and possessions per game. It very well could stay Under being week 1 and needing some time to implement these new systems. Personally, I’m staying away. Good luck if you decide to make a play.
I'll be lurking and will chime in when i can but a play i really like today is nmst tm ttl u21 ....21.5 might be avail -120. Wyo gave up more than 24 one time last yr (oregon) and 8 bk on D. Nmst lots of turnover on offense losing #1 qb, rb,wr so i have a tough time seeing this O get 3 tds.
I'll be lurking and will chime in when i can but a play i really like today is nmst tm ttl u21 ....21.5 might be avail -120. Wyo gave up more than 24 one time last yr (oregon) and 8 bk on D. Nmst lots of turnover on offense losing #1 qb, rb,wr so i have a tough time seeing this O get 3 tds.
Sorry if this has been asked before - how many units do you play on games where you don’t list units?
Nice Call on Wyoming
Sorry if this has been asked before - how many units do you play on games where you don’t list units?
Nice Call on Wyoming
I'll be lurking and will chime in when i can but a play i really like today is nmst tm ttl u21 ....21.5 might be avail -120. Wyo gave up more than 24 one time last yr (oregon) and 8 bk on D. Nmst lots of turnover on offense losing #1 qb, rb,wr so i have a tough time seeing this O get 3 tds.
I'll be lurking and will chime in when i can but a play i really like today is nmst tm ttl u21 ....21.5 might be avail -120. Wyo gave up more than 24 one time last yr (oregon) and 8 bk on D. Nmst lots of turnover on offense losing #1 qb, rb,wr so i have a tough time seeing this O get 3 tds.
Thanks for responding TD I know you get a lot of requests. Unfortunately you’re right I never did get to see the original response - so I still don’t know the answer! GL this season
Thanks for responding TD I know you get a lot of requests. Unfortunately you’re right I never did get to see the original response - so I still don’t know the answer! GL this season
Would you still take Ball St at -12.5. I've been reading up on CCS and their are a lot of high expectations due to them winning their conference and them returning so many players.
Would you still take Iowa state at -14. I know South Dakota returns a good team but I just dont see how they can stick with what Iowa has on offense.
NIU vs Iowa at 48 would you still take the under. I know Iowa is missing both tackles but that game kind of scares me.
Lastly any thoughts on Houston vs Rice. I went back and watched the Rice vs Prairie View game and i just dont see how rice can compete outside of 2 okay Rbs that team has nothing. And Houston is going more uptempo. Thanks again.
Would you still take Ball St at -12.5. I've been reading up on CCS and their are a lot of high expectations due to them winning their conference and them returning so many players.
Would you still take Iowa state at -14. I know South Dakota returns a good team but I just dont see how they can stick with what Iowa has on offense.
NIU vs Iowa at 48 would you still take the under. I know Iowa is missing both tackles but that game kind of scares me.
Lastly any thoughts on Houston vs Rice. I went back and watched the Rice vs Prairie View game and i just dont see how rice can compete outside of 2 okay Rbs that team has nothing. And Houston is going more uptempo. Thanks again.
Would you still take Ball St at -12.5. Yes, but I would check back tomorrow morning. Lines will reset when Vegas opens these games. I've been reading up on CCS and their are a lot of high expectations due to them winning their conference and them returning so many players.
Would you still take Iowa state at -14. I would want -13.5 or better for a small play only. Again, check the updated line tomorrow morning. I know South Dakota returns a good team but I just dont see how they can stick with what Iowa has on offense.
NIU vs Iowa at 48 would you still take the under. Probably so, like it better at 49 or better with a full 7 touchdowns, but I would probably still play it. Maybe just knock your bet size down slightly. I know Iowa is missing both tackles but that game kind of scares me.
Lastly any thoughts on Houston vs Rice. Sure. Full disclosure - I did not watch this game on tv. But from what I can tell, Rice is what we thought they would be under this new coaching staff-- Power run oriented, they want to win time of possession (basically 40 minutes vs. PV), and (someday if all goes well) they'll try to at least play reasonable defense. But right now, if PV with a new starting QB and their top 3 WRs from 2017 gone can have that much success through the air vs. Rice, then Rice is STILL TERRIBLE VS. THE PASS! Houston's attack that Briles will implement should score at will. Unless Rice can play keep away and run the ball surprisingly well, then I think Houston is the correct play. Or no play at all. My revised baseline #s have this line at -28.8. And that's with Rice getting a standard HF of 2.8 points. So, 31.6 points on a neutral field. Should be plenty of Houston fans in the seats since these two schools share the same hometown. I don't think there's really a 2.8 HF advantage here. I went back and watched the Rice vs Prairie View game and i just dont see how rice can compete outside of 2 okay Rbs that team has nothing. And Houston is going more uptempo. Thanks again.
Would you still take Ball St at -12.5. Yes, but I would check back tomorrow morning. Lines will reset when Vegas opens these games. I've been reading up on CCS and their are a lot of high expectations due to them winning their conference and them returning so many players.
Would you still take Iowa state at -14. I would want -13.5 or better for a small play only. Again, check the updated line tomorrow morning. I know South Dakota returns a good team but I just dont see how they can stick with what Iowa has on offense.
NIU vs Iowa at 48 would you still take the under. Probably so, like it better at 49 or better with a full 7 touchdowns, but I would probably still play it. Maybe just knock your bet size down slightly. I know Iowa is missing both tackles but that game kind of scares me.
Lastly any thoughts on Houston vs Rice. Sure. Full disclosure - I did not watch this game on tv. But from what I can tell, Rice is what we thought they would be under this new coaching staff-- Power run oriented, they want to win time of possession (basically 40 minutes vs. PV), and (someday if all goes well) they'll try to at least play reasonable defense. But right now, if PV with a new starting QB and their top 3 WRs from 2017 gone can have that much success through the air vs. Rice, then Rice is STILL TERRIBLE VS. THE PASS! Houston's attack that Briles will implement should score at will. Unless Rice can play keep away and run the ball surprisingly well, then I think Houston is the correct play. Or no play at all. My revised baseline #s have this line at -28.8. And that's with Rice getting a standard HF of 2.8 points. So, 31.6 points on a neutral field. Should be plenty of Houston fans in the seats since these two schools share the same hometown. I don't think there's really a 2.8 HF advantage here. I went back and watched the Rice vs Prairie View game and i just dont see how rice can compete outside of 2 okay Rbs that team has nothing. And Houston is going more uptempo. Thanks again.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.