I like tech for a couple of reasons. Last week i was not on west virginia and i was also not on tech. What scared me in making a bet on that game was that i was leaning tech. Because of that i stayed away.
I know tech plays pretty bad on the road, i went to to tech, its the team i probably know the most about besides UT. Techs defense is surprisingly good this year. They pulled down the curtain on one of the most powerful offenses in the country last week and they also held a good iowa st offense to 13/14 and TCU got crushed by this same iowa st team at home.
I still dont understand the ISU line. I know all about the line movements in all the games i bet. I used to bet only line movements and that turned out to run about 50% if you bet it on every game in both NCAAF as well as NFL. So i take line movement for what it is, a coinflip IMO.
ISU is a good team with a very good defense. They beat TCU on the road and then almost held off a great kstate team the next week. K state has a great defense and iowa st still put up 21 on them while holding k states offense to under 30. OK state has a very good offense but i feel like the stats are fudged as they have not really played anyone of significance and a good portion of their stats come from week 1 vs savannah st. And when i say they have not really played anyone i mean that. UT is no one and so is arizona this year. Both these teams have zero defense. So OK st is walking into a game against a good, something they have not played against yet this season. Iowa st on the other hand has played very good defenses a couple times this year already and did fine against them. This OK st defense should not have a chance. This is very similar reasoning i had last week when i took OK over Texas. Texas had yet to face a good defense going into last weeks game they got shit pushed in just like i thought would happen.
You are right on all points on both teams, which is exactly the point, why the short line for TTU and why the exagerated line for OSU? OSU's homefield is worth more than 3 points?
As far as line movement, it's just one thing I look at on certain games, but especially on games where (1) the line seems too good to be true to me and (2) where 75-80% of the bets are on one side. If you think about it, the 50/50 makes sense because if it happened ALL the time, it would be very easy to spot as a trend right? In reality, this is probably where the theory "the house wants even money on both sides" comes into play, not on one single game, but in a big sample size of games. Vegas only needs 50/50 to make money.