Notre Dame good team, but there's nothing resume suggests play with Alabama 60 minutes. BYU, Stanford, before Hogan was in, MSU, Michiga, solid teams, but not teams that top SEC. Oklahoma probably worst team playing BCS bowl. Notre Dame does running quarterback like Manziel gave Alabma trouble, but Golson isn't passer Manziel, and Alabama will no have extra time prepare experience playing running quarterback. A&M game horrible time Alabama emotional win LSU. I don't see blowout, but hard Notre Dame stay within 10, Alabama wear them down late game and Golson usually turns over several times.
0
Notre Dame good team, but there's nothing resume suggests play with Alabama 60 minutes. BYU, Stanford, before Hogan was in, MSU, Michiga, solid teams, but not teams that top SEC. Oklahoma probably worst team playing BCS bowl. Notre Dame does running quarterback like Manziel gave Alabma trouble, but Golson isn't passer Manziel, and Alabama will no have extra time prepare experience playing running quarterback. A&M game horrible time Alabama emotional win LSU. I don't see blowout, but hard Notre Dame stay within 10, Alabama wear them down late game and Golson usually turns over several times.
Notre Dame good team, but there's nothing resume suggests play with Alabama 60 minutes. BYU, Stanford, before Hogan was in, MSU, Michiga, solid teams, but not teams that top SEC. Oklahoma probably worst team playing BCS bowl. Notre Dame does running quarterback like Manziel gave Alabma trouble, but Golson isn't passer Manziel, and Alabama will no have extra time prepare experience playing running quarterback. A&M game horrible time Alabama emotional win LSU. I don't see blowout, but hard Notre Dame stay within 10, Alabama wear them down late game and Golson usually turns over several times.
Covers need a word and sentence editor, instead of the foul language corrector
0
Quote Originally Posted by brkatz1234:
Notre Dame good team, but there's nothing resume suggests play with Alabama 60 minutes. BYU, Stanford, before Hogan was in, MSU, Michiga, solid teams, but not teams that top SEC. Oklahoma probably worst team playing BCS bowl. Notre Dame does running quarterback like Manziel gave Alabma trouble, but Golson isn't passer Manziel, and Alabama will no have extra time prepare experience playing running quarterback. A&M game horrible time Alabama emotional win LSU. I don't see blowout, but hard Notre Dame stay within 10, Alabama wear them down late game and Golson usually turns over several times.
Covers need a word and sentence editor, instead of the foul language corrector
I will bet you my 1 unit vs. your 1 unit on that one
In post #33 mbialowas said:
Wanna bet?
How much did you lose on Bama tonightGeorgia was the essiest bet on the board
I subsequently accepted both of your offers to bet on whether Alabama will score more time than they punt. But rather than confirm the bet and establish an amount, you are now apparently trying to find every way possible to weasel out of the bet YOU PROPOSED TO ME!!!
I even went so far as to sweeten the deal by also offering you Notre Dame +13.5 with no vig. You can't find a better Notre Dame bet anywhere, yet you continue to bob and weave. Either you want to accept one or both bets (for whatever amount you're comfortable betting), or you don't. I'm ok either way, but I am growing weary of discussing it. mbialowas can get the exact same bet, but when it came time for him to confirm the bet HE PROPOSED TO ME, he pulled a Boom Boom.
So what's it going to be???
Owned , Now thats some funny garbage..GL Jimmy..
0
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:
Let's review the conversation.
In post #31 I said:
Alabama will score more times than they punt.
In post #32 you said:
I will bet you my 1 unit vs. your 1 unit on that one
In post #33 mbialowas said:
Wanna bet?
How much did you lose on Bama tonightGeorgia was the essiest bet on the board
I subsequently accepted both of your offers to bet on whether Alabama will score more time than they punt. But rather than confirm the bet and establish an amount, you are now apparently trying to find every way possible to weasel out of the bet YOU PROPOSED TO ME!!!
I even went so far as to sweeten the deal by also offering you Notre Dame +13.5 with no vig. You can't find a better Notre Dame bet anywhere, yet you continue to bob and weave. Either you want to accept one or both bets (for whatever amount you're comfortable betting), or you don't. I'm ok either way, but I am growing weary of discussing it. mbialowas can get the exact same bet, but when it came time for him to confirm the bet HE PROPOSED TO ME, he pulled a Boom Boom.
I will bet you my 1 unit vs. your 1 unit on that one
In post #33 mbialowas said:
Wanna bet?
How much did you lose on Bama tonightGeorgia was the essiest bet on the board
I subsequently accepted both of your offers to bet on whether Alabama will score more time than they punt. But rather than confirm the bet and establish an amount, you are now apparently trying to find every way possible to weasel out of the bet YOU PROPOSED TO ME!!!
I even went so far as to sweeten the deal by also offering you Notre Dame +13.5 with no vig. You can't find a better Notre Dame bet anywhere, yet you continue to bob and weave. Either you want to accept one or both bets (for whatever amount you're comfortable betting), or you don't. I'm ok either way, but I am growing weary of discussing it. mbialowas can get the exact same bet, but when it came time for him to confirm the bet HE PROPOSED TO ME, he pulled a Boom Boom.
So what's it going to be???
I just came to the realization that it's a bs sucker behind bet and you know this as well but won't admit it so what's the point. You talk huge game about Bama I offered to take ND TT over 5.5 and Bama TT Under 40.5 which you also stated and asked for you to bet on with ND at +13.5 all parlayed together and you won't accept that action. The TT should even matter since Bama is going to beat ND 40-6 in your mind hence you would win the bet with Bama -13.5. So the real ownage here is the fact that you don't have the balls to accept a bet that gives you a 6-1 advantage. I want this parlay nothing else. You said you would book all my action on this game there it is. Take it or leave or come with a counter proposal.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:
Let's review the conversation.
In post #31 I said:
Alabama will score more times than they punt.
In post #32 you said:
I will bet you my 1 unit vs. your 1 unit on that one
In post #33 mbialowas said:
Wanna bet?
How much did you lose on Bama tonightGeorgia was the essiest bet on the board
I subsequently accepted both of your offers to bet on whether Alabama will score more time than they punt. But rather than confirm the bet and establish an amount, you are now apparently trying to find every way possible to weasel out of the bet YOU PROPOSED TO ME!!!
I even went so far as to sweeten the deal by also offering you Notre Dame +13.5 with no vig. You can't find a better Notre Dame bet anywhere, yet you continue to bob and weave. Either you want to accept one or both bets (for whatever amount you're comfortable betting), or you don't. I'm ok either way, but I am growing weary of discussing it. mbialowas can get the exact same bet, but when it came time for him to confirm the bet HE PROPOSED TO ME, he pulled a Boom Boom.
So what's it going to be???
I just came to the realization that it's a bs sucker behind bet and you know this as well but won't admit it so what's the point. You talk huge game about Bama I offered to take ND TT over 5.5 and Bama TT Under 40.5 which you also stated and asked for you to bet on with ND at +13.5 all parlayed together and you won't accept that action. The TT should even matter since Bama is going to beat ND 40-6 in your mind hence you would win the bet with Bama -13.5. So the real ownage here is the fact that you don't have the balls to accept a bet that gives you a 6-1 advantage. I want this parlay nothing else. You said you would book all my action on this game there it is. Take it or leave or come with a counter proposal.
I just came to the realization that it's a bs sucker behind bet and you know this as well but won't admit it so what's the point. You talk huge game about Bama I offered to take ND TT over 5.5 and Bama TT Under 40.5 which you also stated and asked for you to bet on with ND at +13.5 all parlayed together and you won't accept that action. The TT should even matter since Bama is going to beat ND 40-6 in your mind hence you would win the bet with Bama -13.5. So the real ownage here is the fact that you don't have the balls to accept a bet that gives you a 6-1 advantage. I want this parlay nothing else. You said you would book all my action on this game there it is. Take it or leave or come with a counter proposal.
You're over cooking my grits bro. Didn't read. A simple yes or no would have sufficed.
I wonder if I can get a single Notre Dame backer to take them @ 13.5??? Should be fun between now and kickoff. I couldn't get a single Michigan backer to take 16.5 earlier in the season.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BLOODandTHUNDER:
I just came to the realization that it's a bs sucker behind bet and you know this as well but won't admit it so what's the point. You talk huge game about Bama I offered to take ND TT over 5.5 and Bama TT Under 40.5 which you also stated and asked for you to bet on with ND at +13.5 all parlayed together and you won't accept that action. The TT should even matter since Bama is going to beat ND 40-6 in your mind hence you would win the bet with Bama -13.5. So the real ownage here is the fact that you don't have the balls to accept a bet that gives you a 6-1 advantage. I want this parlay nothing else. You said you would book all my action on this game there it is. Take it or leave or come with a counter proposal.
You're over cooking my grits bro. Didn't read. A simple yes or no would have sufficed.
I wonder if I can get a single Notre Dame backer to take them @ 13.5??? Should be fun between now and kickoff. I couldn't get a single Michigan backer to take 16.5 earlier in the season.
tease bama and the under ITS A LOCK......7PT TEASER.
If you like the under, why would you risk teasing the FAV? +17 looks better than -3. Vegas already is thinking 21-10. I don't see redzone conversions from Bama, or ND, or 3rd down conversions even nearing 30-40%.Did you not see A&M force Bama to throw in the redzone? And cm'n, ND defense > A and M (by far). Either team wins by 1-2 scores, but better to take the dog.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bodogjoe:
tease bama and the under ITS A LOCK......7PT TEASER.
If you like the under, why would you risk teasing the FAV? +17 looks better than -3. Vegas already is thinking 21-10. I don't see redzone conversions from Bama, or ND, or 3rd down conversions even nearing 30-40%.Did you not see A&M force Bama to throw in the redzone? And cm'n, ND defense > A and M (by far). Either team wins by 1-2 scores, but better to take the dog.
Saban, might be best college coach, give him over a month to prepare
We all saw what happened last yr, plus bama is more talented in almost every aspect, could be wrong but it baffles me how many people think Irish have a chance in the game.
0
Saban, might be best college coach, give him over a month to prepare
We all saw what happened last yr, plus bama is more talented in almost every aspect, could be wrong but it baffles me how many people think Irish have a chance in the game.
Jimmy, no disrespect but Ill take that bet, You have given Notre Dame no credit for the schedule they played this year, It wasnt there fault Barkley was injured when they played USC. They beat every team they played, and they did blow out the weaker teams like Navy,and wake forest they also put pretty good beat downs on Oklahoma and Miami.
Bama barely beat LSU, Lost to A&M and barely beat Georgia
Ahh yes they blew out a bunch of horrible teams Tennessee Arkansas W-Kentucky W-Carolina that was laughable Fl-Atlantic Auburn
You are all looking at the big wins but you all fail to see who they played, the only competent teams they played, they beat by a combined 8 points and you think they are gonna run all over Notre Dame? You were right about one thing friend, When you said Vegas is giving away free money, Yes they are if you are taking Notre Dame
0
Jimmy, no disrespect but Ill take that bet, You have given Notre Dame no credit for the schedule they played this year, It wasnt there fault Barkley was injured when they played USC. They beat every team they played, and they did blow out the weaker teams like Navy,and wake forest they also put pretty good beat downs on Oklahoma and Miami.
Bama barely beat LSU, Lost to A&M and barely beat Georgia
Ahh yes they blew out a bunch of horrible teams Tennessee Arkansas W-Kentucky W-Carolina that was laughable Fl-Atlantic Auburn
You are all looking at the big wins but you all fail to see who they played, the only competent teams they played, they beat by a combined 8 points and you think they are gonna run all over Notre Dame? You were right about one thing friend, When you said Vegas is giving away free money, Yes they are if you are taking Notre Dame
Hey Jimmy, you cockmunching tranny whats up with the personal attacks?Calling me Boomi am still here , and i still want to take your money. I have just had more important things to take care of the last few days than troll this thread like youSo what is the bet going to be? I will take Bama under 4 td or ND tt over 5.5, or Bama tt under 40.5. Whats it going to be?
0
Hey Jimmy, you cockmunching tranny whats up with the personal attacks?Calling me Boomi am still here , and i still want to take your money. I have just had more important things to take care of the last few days than troll this thread like youSo what is the bet going to be? I will take Bama under 4 td or ND tt over 5.5, or Bama tt under 40.5. Whats it going to be?
"I want ND butmidwest teams vs SEC teams are a mismatch."
Sounds to me like the aftershocks of downing a few nuked hot pockets for dinner with a Bud Lite and a few nauseous hours of ESPN talking heads...then farted this out to post on covers. Thanks for the 'gas.'
0
Quote Originally Posted by htrain34:
"capped this game last night. "
Bama 27
ND 13
"I want ND butmidwest teams vs SEC teams are a mismatch."
Sounds to me like the aftershocks of downing a few nuked hot pockets for dinner with a Bud Lite and a few nauseous hours of ESPN talking heads...then farted this out to post on covers. Thanks for the 'gas.'
Jimmy, no disrespect but Ill take that bet, You have given Notre Dame no credit for the schedule they played this year, It wasnt there fault Barkley was injured when they played USC. They beat every team they played, and they did blow out the weaker teams like Navy,and wake forest they also put pretty good beat downs on Oklahoma and Miami.
Bama barely beat LSU, Lost to A&M and barely beat Georgia
Ahh yes they blew out a bunch of horrible teams Tennessee Arkansas W-Kentucky W-Carolina that was laughable Fl-Atlantic Auburn
You are all looking at the big wins but you all fail to see who they played, the only competent teams they played, they beat by a combined 8 points and you think they are gonna run all over Notre Dame? You were right about one thing friend, When you said Vegas is giving away free money, Yes they are if you are taking Notre Dame
Which bet would you like to accept??? Notre Dame +13.5, or that Alabama will score more times than they punt, or both???
0
Quote Originally Posted by mafioso:
Jimmy, no disrespect but Ill take that bet, You have given Notre Dame no credit for the schedule they played this year, It wasnt there fault Barkley was injured when they played USC. They beat every team they played, and they did blow out the weaker teams like Navy,and wake forest they also put pretty good beat downs on Oklahoma and Miami.
Bama barely beat LSU, Lost to A&M and barely beat Georgia
Ahh yes they blew out a bunch of horrible teams Tennessee Arkansas W-Kentucky W-Carolina that was laughable Fl-Atlantic Auburn
You are all looking at the big wins but you all fail to see who they played, the only competent teams they played, they beat by a combined 8 points and you think they are gonna run all over Notre Dame? You were right about one thing friend, When you said Vegas is giving away free money, Yes they are if you are taking Notre Dame
Which bet would you like to accept??? Notre Dame +13.5, or that Alabama will score more times than they punt, or both???
Hey Jimmy, you cockmunching tranny whats up with the personal attacks?Calling me Boomi am still here , and i still want to take your money. I have just had more important things to take care of the last few days than troll this thread like youSo what is the bet going to be? I will take Bama under 4 td or ND tt over 5.5, or Bama tt under 40.5. Whats it going to be?
Go back and read post #78 and respond accordingly.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
Hey Jimmy, you cockmunching tranny whats up with the personal attacks?Calling me Boomi am still here , and i still want to take your money. I have just had more important things to take care of the last few days than troll this thread like youSo what is the bet going to be? I will take Bama under 4 td or ND tt over 5.5, or Bama tt under 40.5. Whats it going to be?
Go back and read post #78 and respond accordingly.
Which bet would you like to accept??? Notre Dame +13.5, or that Alabama will score more times than they punt, or both???
What would be the downside of me taking Notre Dame +13 1/2 for as much as you want to bet and laying it off with a local who has it at 9 1/2 right now? I'm oldschool and have never made an online bet in my life, so somebody out there talk some sense into me.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:
Which bet would you like to accept??? Notre Dame +13.5, or that Alabama will score more times than they punt, or both???
What would be the downside of me taking Notre Dame +13 1/2 for as much as you want to bet and laying it off with a local who has it at 9 1/2 right now? I'm oldschool and have never made an online bet in my life, so somebody out there talk some sense into me.
What would be the downside of me taking Notre Dame +13 1/2 for as much as you want to bet and laying it off with a local who has it at 9 1/2 right now? I'm oldschool and have never made an online bet in my life, so somebody out there talk some sense into me.
The downside risk is losing the amount of money you put at risk.
0
Quote Originally Posted by soonboomer:
What would be the downside of me taking Notre Dame +13 1/2 for as much as you want to bet and laying it off with a local who has it at 9 1/2 right now? I'm oldschool and have never made an online bet in my life, so somebody out there talk some sense into me.
The downside risk is losing the amount of money you put at risk.
The downside risk is losing the amount of money you put at risk.
Which is the vig on the bet I off locally with a 4 point middle, correct? So, in effect, I could bet you a couple of dimes and and stand to win $4000 with a max loss of $200?
0
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:
The downside risk is losing the amount of money you put at risk.
Which is the vig on the bet I off locally with a 4 point middle, correct? So, in effect, I could bet you a couple of dimes and and stand to win $4000 with a max loss of $200?
You're over cooking my grits bro. Didn't read. A simple yes or no would have sufficed.
I wonder if I can get a single Notre Dame backer to take them @ 13.5??? Should be fun between now and kickoff. I couldn't get a single Michigan backer to take 16.5 earlier in the season.
I like that over cooking your grits
I will take ND my unit vs your 1 unit +13.5 since no one else will step up.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:
You're over cooking my grits bro. Didn't read. A simple yes or no would have sufficed.
I wonder if I can get a single Notre Dame backer to take them @ 13.5??? Should be fun between now and kickoff. I couldn't get a single Michigan backer to take 16.5 earlier in the season.
I like that over cooking your grits
I will take ND my unit vs your 1 unit +13.5 since no one else will step up.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.