UL Monroe beat #8 Arkansas at home in OT, then they went on the road and loss in OT to Auburn. Two SEC teams. They come back home against Baylor, a non ranked team which is going on the road for the first time this year after losing 5 offensive starters (QB, RB, WR, two lineman), yet UL Monroe is still getting 7.5?
Don't be fooled. Auburn has no quarterback and Arkansas didn't have Tyler Wilson in the second half. In the first half (21-7 Arkansas), Arkansas had the ball 6 times, ran 36 plays (5 play of 15 yards or more), not counting last possession where they received ball with 18 seconds and not counting punting as a play, they scored 3 touchdowns, 1 interception and 2 punts.
Nick Florence is no Brandon Allen nor Kiehl Frazier. Frazier definitely isn't a passer and Allen definitely wasn't prepared to play (coach's fault because you would expect to blow them out and have him ready to run a few plays). Florence beat Missouri in 2009 on the road in his 5th career start as a true freshman with a team record of 3-5 down 11 points at halftime. 32 for 43, 427 yards, 3 TDs and 0 INT. Senior QB, on list for Golden Arm award = he can sling it. UL Monroe gives up big plays and Baylor's offense is potent. What I'm saying is, UL Monroe defense isn't good against a QB who can actually pass the ball.
The line 7.5 is available at all books which is really no different from 8 to 9.5. You are realistically looking at two scores (realistically because you can't expect/rely on miss xp / safety / 2pt conversion/fail). Sharps aren't always right but when they see value, they jump on it. If sharps think UL Monroe is the play, 7.5 wouldn't be available, lines would be at 7 everywhere. You can say, maybe they are waiting for the line to move. The line going to 8 to 9.5, won't make a difference unless it hits 10. At 7.5, the books WANT/BAITING you to play UL Monore and more people will be tempted to play UL Monroe based off their past two games.If the books thought UL Monroe was the play, line would be at 6.5/7.
For those who think UL Monroe is the play, I'd recommend over instead because Baylor won't be stopped.
Baylor -7 (bought 1/2) -115
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
UL Monroe beat #8 Arkansas at home in OT, then they went on the road and loss in OT to Auburn. Two SEC teams. They come back home against Baylor, a non ranked team which is going on the road for the first time this year after losing 5 offensive starters (QB, RB, WR, two lineman), yet UL Monroe is still getting 7.5?
Don't be fooled. Auburn has no quarterback and Arkansas didn't have Tyler Wilson in the second half. In the first half (21-7 Arkansas), Arkansas had the ball 6 times, ran 36 plays (5 play of 15 yards or more), not counting last possession where they received ball with 18 seconds and not counting punting as a play, they scored 3 touchdowns, 1 interception and 2 punts.
Nick Florence is no Brandon Allen nor Kiehl Frazier. Frazier definitely isn't a passer and Allen definitely wasn't prepared to play (coach's fault because you would expect to blow them out and have him ready to run a few plays). Florence beat Missouri in 2009 on the road in his 5th career start as a true freshman with a team record of 3-5 down 11 points at halftime. 32 for 43, 427 yards, 3 TDs and 0 INT. Senior QB, on list for Golden Arm award = he can sling it. UL Monroe gives up big plays and Baylor's offense is potent. What I'm saying is, UL Monroe defense isn't good against a QB who can actually pass the ball.
The line 7.5 is available at all books which is really no different from 8 to 9.5. You are realistically looking at two scores (realistically because you can't expect/rely on miss xp / safety / 2pt conversion/fail). Sharps aren't always right but when they see value, they jump on it. If sharps think UL Monroe is the play, 7.5 wouldn't be available, lines would be at 7 everywhere. You can say, maybe they are waiting for the line to move. The line going to 8 to 9.5, won't make a difference unless it hits 10. At 7.5, the books WANT/BAITING you to play UL Monore and more people will be tempted to play UL Monroe based off their past two games.If the books thought UL Monroe was the play, line would be at 6.5/7.
For those who think UL Monroe is the play, I'd recommend over instead because Baylor won't be stopped.
Just to clarify, there is no play on the over/under for me. Just recommending to UL Monroe backers that the over is a better play instead (you would think the only way UL Monroe stays in this game is if they score).
0
Just to clarify, there is no play on the over/under for me. Just recommending to UL Monroe backers that the over is a better play instead (you would think the only way UL Monroe stays in this game is if they score).
So at the end you get Baylor -7 (not -7.5), right?
Yes, I got Baylor -7. You don't want to buy points too much but when you move off a key number, there is value to it depending on how much it is going to cost you. If it costs you a lot, then it isn't worth it.
I got -7 for -115
0
Quote Originally Posted by gambling-devil:
So at the end you get Baylor -7 (not -7.5), right?
Yes, I got Baylor -7. You don't want to buy points too much but when you move off a key number, there is value to it depending on how much it is going to cost you. If it costs you a lot, then it isn't worth it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.