however, there are two good reasons for this line to be unreasonably inflated: (1) ball state's on the road with an awful (1-8) su record ytd; and (2) no ill put up a ton of points last week in a blowout over a hapless e. mich team.
a closer look might make you reconsider laying 17 points against ball state.
true, ball state has only won one game. but here are the margins their games this year:
north texas -10
new hampshire -7
army - 7
auburn -24
toledo -7
temple -5
bowling green -14
eastern michigan +2
ohio -3
take-home messge: if you throw out auburn (who is clearly an outlier in terms of competition), ball state HAS NOT LOST BY MORE THAN 14 POINTS ALL YEAR LONG.
in fact, ball state has been losing by smaller margins late in the year (even against somewhat stiffer competition).
don't let the books fool you with ball st's ytd su record. don't let the books fool you with no. illinois' blowout victory margin last week against a godawful e. michigan team.
take the points tonight. i know it's hard to put your coin on a team like ball state, but 17 points is too many.
bol
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
look, i know ball state sucks as much as you do.
however, there are two good reasons for this line to be unreasonably inflated: (1) ball state's on the road with an awful (1-8) su record ytd; and (2) no ill put up a ton of points last week in a blowout over a hapless e. mich team.
a closer look might make you reconsider laying 17 points against ball state.
true, ball state has only won one game. but here are the margins their games this year:
north texas -10
new hampshire -7
army - 7
auburn -24
toledo -7
temple -5
bowling green -14
eastern michigan +2
ohio -3
take-home messge: if you throw out auburn (who is clearly an outlier in terms of competition), ball state HAS NOT LOST BY MORE THAN 14 POINTS ALL YEAR LONG.
in fact, ball state has been losing by smaller margins late in the year (even against somewhat stiffer competition).
don't let the books fool you with ball st's ytd su record. don't let the books fool you with no. illinois' blowout victory margin last week against a godawful e. michigan team.
take the points tonight. i know it's hard to put your coin on a team like ball state, but 17 points is too many.
It's a no play for me as of now because of the same reason, cannot bet on a bad team but hard to ignore the stat. The one thing I would like to bring up is that next to Auburn, No. Ill is one of the better team Ball State will be facing this year. No. Ill is for real and they definitely can do both, running and passing the ball.
BOL
0
It's a no play for me as of now because of the same reason, cannot bet on a bad team but hard to ignore the stat. The one thing I would like to bring up is that next to Auburn, No. Ill is one of the better team Ball State will be facing this year. No. Ill is for real and they definitely can do both, running and passing the ball.
That maybe but I am going to take N. Illinois in a 15 point teaser to just win by 3 or more. I feel more comfortable with that play then teasing Ball State up to +32. I personally witnessed the debacle that was Eastern Michigan and feel extremely confident that N. Illinois wins this game. BOL!
0
That maybe but I am going to take N. Illinois in a 15 point teaser to just win by 3 or more. I feel more comfortable with that play then teasing Ball State up to +32. I personally witnessed the debacle that was Eastern Michigan and feel extremely confident that N. Illinois wins this game. BOL!
sorry but all of those teams that ball st lose against to are nothing like N.Ill...N Ill have the defense to stop ball st from scoring...and to me ball st and emich are very similar since they both suck...i say lay the -17 points wth N.Ill.
wining by 2 points over Emich? losing 10 to North Texas New Hamshire? who the fuck?
Are you kidding me? you think ball st is good bc they lost less by 10 points to those teams? ROFL
0
sorry but all of those teams that ball st lose against to are nothing like N.Ill...N Ill have the defense to stop ball st from scoring...and to me ball st and emich are very similar since they both suck...i say lay the -17 points wth N.Ill.
wining by 2 points over Emich? losing 10 to North Texas New Hamshire? who the fuck?
Are you kidding me? you think ball st is good bc they lost less by 10 points to those teams? ROFL
sorry but all of those teams that ball st lose against to are nothing like N.Ill...N Ill have the defense to stop ball st from scoring...and to me ball st and emich are very similar since they both suck...i say lay the -17 points wth N.Ill.
wining by 2 points over Emich? losing 10 to North Texas New Hamshire? who the fuck?
Are you kidding me? you think ball st is good bc they lost less by 10 points to those teams? ROFL
easy there, turbo. read the whole thread. i'm on the same side of this game as you are (though i'm not giving as many points).
i made a point of stating that they have lost by slimmer marginslater in the yearto better competition. laugh all you want, guy, but that invalidates your argument about north texas and new hampshire, doesn't it?
i hope you're right and no. ill blows them out so i don't have to sweat this game in the fourth quarter. but i'm not convinced that this line as as slam-dunk easy as you (and others) have made it out to be. that's all.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ch33z:
sorry but all of those teams that ball st lose against to are nothing like N.Ill...N Ill have the defense to stop ball st from scoring...and to me ball st and emich are very similar since they both suck...i say lay the -17 points wth N.Ill.
wining by 2 points over Emich? losing 10 to North Texas New Hamshire? who the fuck?
Are you kidding me? you think ball st is good bc they lost less by 10 points to those teams? ROFL
easy there, turbo. read the whole thread. i'm on the same side of this game as you are (though i'm not giving as many points).
i made a point of stating that they have lost by slimmer marginslater in the yearto better competition. laugh all you want, guy, but that invalidates your argument about north texas and new hampshire, doesn't it?
i hope you're right and no. ill blows them out so i don't have to sweat this game in the fourth quarter. but i'm not convinced that this line as as slam-dunk easy as you (and others) have made it out to be. that's all.
sorry but all of those teams that ball st lose against to are nothing like N.Ill...N Ill have the defense to stop ball st from scoring...and to me ball st and emich are very similar since they both suck...i say lay the -17 points wth N.Ill.
wining by 2 points over Emich? losing 10 to North Texas New Hamshire? who the fuck?
Are you kidding me? you think ball st is good bc they lost less by 10 points to those teams? ROFL
New Hampshire is in Henniker I believe. About as toothless a football town as you'll find...
I'd rather be playing D&D.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ch33z:
sorry but all of those teams that ball st lose against to are nothing like N.Ill...N Ill have the defense to stop ball st from scoring...and to me ball st and emich are very similar since they both suck...i say lay the -17 points wth N.Ill.
wining by 2 points over Emich? losing 10 to North Texas New Hamshire? who the fuck?
Are you kidding me? you think ball st is good bc they lost less by 10 points to those teams? ROFL
New Hampshire is in Henniker I believe. About as toothless a football town as you'll find...
the total number of points allowed by ball state this year, by opponent:
north texas 20
new hampshire 23
army 24
auburn 54
toledo 37
temple 24
bowling green 31
eastern michigan 27
ohio 20
again, for sake of this argument, let's take auburn out of the equation because they don't represent the kind of competition we're studying for tonight's game.
on average, ball state is giving up 25.7 points per game.
northern illinois is no offensive juggernaut (unless they're playing eastern michigan). the husky defense is stout, no doubt, but they're going to have to be PRETTY DAMNED STOUT tonight if northern illinois is going to cover a 17 point line while putting up 25.7 points.
let's say no. illinois scores more points than ball state has been giving up on average. say they even score 34 (the most points that ball state has given up to a team not named auburn this year). you're THAT sure that ball state can't socre 17? that's pretty cavalier.
again, please don't get the wrong idea here. my money's on northern illinois (-7). i'm just cautioning against what appears to be slind support for northern illinois on what appears to me to be a potentially inflated line.
0
here's another way to look at this.
the total number of points allowed by ball state this year, by opponent:
north texas 20
new hampshire 23
army 24
auburn 54
toledo 37
temple 24
bowling green 31
eastern michigan 27
ohio 20
again, for sake of this argument, let's take auburn out of the equation because they don't represent the kind of competition we're studying for tonight's game.
on average, ball state is giving up 25.7 points per game.
northern illinois is no offensive juggernaut (unless they're playing eastern michigan). the husky defense is stout, no doubt, but they're going to have to be PRETTY DAMNED STOUT tonight if northern illinois is going to cover a 17 point line while putting up 25.7 points.
let's say no. illinois scores more points than ball state has been giving up on average. say they even score 34 (the most points that ball state has given up to a team not named auburn this year). you're THAT sure that ball state can't socre 17? that's pretty cavalier.
again, please don't get the wrong idea here. my money's on northern illinois (-7). i'm just cautioning against what appears to be slind support for northern illinois on what appears to me to be a potentially inflated line.
sorry but all of those teams that ball st lose against to are nothing like N.Ill...N Ill have the defense to stop ball st from scoring...and to me ball st and emich are very similar since they both suck...i say lay the -17 points wth N.Ill.
wining by 2 points over Emich? losing 10 to North Texas New Hamshire? who the fuck?
Are you kidding me? you think ball st is good bc they lost less by 10 points to those teams? ROFL
I have to agree. Also, like NOSaintsss said - their down to scraping the bottom of the barrel to even start a QB. I believe they have 2 true freshmen and a redshirt. Is that correct?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ch33z:
sorry but all of those teams that ball st lose against to are nothing like N.Ill...N Ill have the defense to stop ball st from scoring...and to me ball st and emich are very similar since they both suck...i say lay the -17 points wth N.Ill.
wining by 2 points over Emich? losing 10 to North Texas New Hamshire? who the fuck?
Are you kidding me? you think ball st is good bc they lost less by 10 points to those teams? ROFL
I have to agree. Also, like NOSaintsss said - their down to scraping the bottom of the barrel to even start a QB. I believe they have 2 true freshmen and a redshirt. Is that correct?
however, there are two good reasons for this line to be unreasonably inflated: (1) ball state's on the road with an awful (1-8) su record ytd; and (2) no ill put up a ton of points last week in a blowout over a hapless e. mich team.
a closer look might make you reconsider laying 17 points against ball state.
true, ball state has only won one game. but here are the margins their games this year:
north texas -10
new hampshire -7
army - 7
auburn -24
toledo -7
temple -5
bowling green -14
eastern michigan +2
ohio -3
take-home messge: if you throw out auburn (who is clearly an outlier in terms of competition), ball state HAS NOT LOST BY MORE THAN 14 POINTS ALL YEAR LONG.
in fact, ball state has been losing by smaller margins late in the year (even against somewhat stiffer competition).
don't let the books fool you with ball st's ytd su record. don't let the books fool you with no. illinois' blowout victory margin last week against a godawful e. michigan team.
take the points tonight. i know it's hard to put your coin on a team like ball state, but 17 points is too many.
bol
U RAISED SOME GREAT POINTS HOWEVER BALL STATE MAY BE LOSING BY A SMALLER MARGIN AT THE SAME TIME N. ILLINOIS HAS TURNED IT UP ALSO. THEY HAVE A BEAST AT RUNNING BACK AND THEY R PLAYING FOR SOMETHING BALL STATE IS NOT.
IT MAY BE CLOSE BUT DONT BE SURPRISED TO SEE A BLOWOUT EITHER.
0
Quote Originally Posted by QwackMD:
look, i know ball state sucks as much as you do.
however, there are two good reasons for this line to be unreasonably inflated: (1) ball state's on the road with an awful (1-8) su record ytd; and (2) no ill put up a ton of points last week in a blowout over a hapless e. mich team.
a closer look might make you reconsider laying 17 points against ball state.
true, ball state has only won one game. but here are the margins their games this year:
north texas -10
new hampshire -7
army - 7
auburn -24
toledo -7
temple -5
bowling green -14
eastern michigan +2
ohio -3
take-home messge: if you throw out auburn (who is clearly an outlier in terms of competition), ball state HAS NOT LOST BY MORE THAN 14 POINTS ALL YEAR LONG.
in fact, ball state has been losing by smaller margins late in the year (even against somewhat stiffer competition).
don't let the books fool you with ball st's ytd su record. don't let the books fool you with no. illinois' blowout victory margin last week against a godawful e. michigan team.
take the points tonight. i know it's hard to put your coin on a team like ball state, but 17 points is too many.
bol
U RAISED SOME GREAT POINTS HOWEVER BALL STATE MAY BE LOSING BY A SMALLER MARGIN AT THE SAME TIME N. ILLINOIS HAS TURNED IT UP ALSO. THEY HAVE A BEAST AT RUNNING BACK AND THEY R PLAYING FOR SOMETHING BALL STATE IS NOT.
IT MAY BE CLOSE BUT DONT BE SURPRISED TO SEE A BLOWOUT EITHER.
I have to agree. Also, like NOSaintsss said - their down to scraping the bottom of the barrel to even start a QB. I believe they have 2 true freshmen and a redshirt. Is that correct?
true, true. the qb situation is worrisome for ball state backers.
bol to all us husky backers. i'll check back on this thread tonight.
sorry for the typo up there in post #16. slind = blind.
0
Quote Originally Posted by WendysRox:
I have to agree. Also, like NOSaintsss said - their down to scraping the bottom of the barrel to even start a QB. I believe they have 2 true freshmen and a redshirt. Is that correct?
true, true. the qb situation is worrisome for ball state backers.
bol to all us husky backers. i'll check back on this thread tonight.
sorry for the typo up there in post #16. slind = blind.
New Hampshire may not be good by Div. I standards but they only have 1 loss in IAA. It was to a divisional foe and the loss was only by 6.
I think that there is no doubt that No. Illini wins this game especially with it being a week night game. The question is will they be up by 24 points and not allow the moose to rear its ugly head.
It's a no play for me but if I just had to take this game, I would probably take the points. No. Ill. is gonna run the ball, as they lead their conference in rushing, but it will be running against the 5th best run defense in their conference.
B. St. has played som run-heavy offenses and have only yielded 11 TD's so far. That's only 2 more than No. Illini. who has faced more pass-heavy offenses. JMHO Good luck on which ever side you take.
0
New Hampshire may not be good by Div. I standards but they only have 1 loss in IAA. It was to a divisional foe and the loss was only by 6.
I think that there is no doubt that No. Illini wins this game especially with it being a week night game. The question is will they be up by 24 points and not allow the moose to rear its ugly head.
It's a no play for me but if I just had to take this game, I would probably take the points. No. Ill. is gonna run the ball, as they lead their conference in rushing, but it will be running against the 5th best run defense in their conference.
B. St. has played som run-heavy offenses and have only yielded 11 TD's so far. That's only 2 more than No. Illini. who has faced more pass-heavy offenses. JMHO Good luck on which ever side you take.
That is correct WendysRox........and like kingpin said NIU has definitely turned it up
Turned it up is a bit much - there last four games, straight up loss to Toledo as 7.5 favs, not covering a 7 point line against crappy Miami Ohio, Covering against Akron (that is a nice win and cover) and then destroying E. Michigan. That game should have NO BEARING on your capping of this game. E. Michigan is horrible we all know, they were on the end of a horrible bus trip road trip and didn't show up. This is 100% an inflated line, doesn't mean N. Ill. wont cover just means you wont be winning in the long run if you are betting the favorites with inflated lines. Good luck
0
Quote Originally Posted by NOSaintsss:
That is correct WendysRox........and like kingpin said NIU has definitely turned it up
Turned it up is a bit much - there last four games, straight up loss to Toledo as 7.5 favs, not covering a 7 point line against crappy Miami Ohio, Covering against Akron (that is a nice win and cover) and then destroying E. Michigan. That game should have NO BEARING on your capping of this game. E. Michigan is horrible we all know, they were on the end of a horrible bus trip road trip and didn't show up. This is 100% an inflated line, doesn't mean N. Ill. wont cover just means you wont be winning in the long run if you are betting the favorites with inflated lines. Good luck
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.