The Tide came Through
for me as well.
Good Luck and Happy New Year
Correction : I needed to put my readers on
Thanks Fella's!!
Championship Game; LSU/Clemson Under 70 2 units
Believe the Clemson defense can slow this one down enough. Clemson is my lean at +5.5 but I don't like their red zone success rate compared to LSU's.
13 of 22 FG's made also a concern. Under looks best to me.
Thanks Fella's!!
Championship Game; LSU/Clemson Under 70 2 units
Believe the Clemson defense can slow this one down enough. Clemson is my lean at +5.5 but I don't like their red zone success rate compared to LSU's.
13 of 22 FG's made also a concern. Under looks best to me.
I'm starting to lean Clemson here as well. I reference LSU playing Auburn and UGA; Auburn held them to 23 in Baton Rouge and UGA "held" them to 37 with basically no offensive counter attack to speak of. I'd say Clemson's D is at least in that conversation and can hold LSU to 30-35.
The Clemson offense took quite a beating against OSU. Ol went down, both receivers, and Lawrence took several big shots. I know they've had two weeks to recover but it should still be considered.
Has LSU played a QB as mobile as Lawrence? Plumlee from Ole Miss went off...
Has Clemson played a receiving corps like LSU's? I'd say they're a notch above OSU; no one else in the ACC is close.
I'm starting to lean Clemson here as well. I reference LSU playing Auburn and UGA; Auburn held them to 23 in Baton Rouge and UGA "held" them to 37 with basically no offensive counter attack to speak of. I'd say Clemson's D is at least in that conversation and can hold LSU to 30-35.
The Clemson offense took quite a beating against OSU. Ol went down, both receivers, and Lawrence took several big shots. I know they've had two weeks to recover but it should still be considered.
Has LSU played a QB as mobile as Lawrence? Plumlee from Ole Miss went off...
Has Clemson played a receiving corps like LSU's? I'd say they're a notch above OSU; no one else in the ACC is close.
Nice to be lucky once in awhile! Avoided betting Clemson for all the wrong reasons and won the under when PAC-12 refs called offensive PI on Higgins TD catch. It wasn't.
Not to mention that late Moss TD had offensive pass interference not called. An obvious play that's been around since the dawn of time but PAC-12 refs don't see it. Not whining here, had no play on either team, just hate to see it.
Burrows and LSU got it done! Clemson's best chance, IMO, was to stifle that LSU offense, didn't happen.
ON TO NEXT YEAR!!!
Nice to be lucky once in awhile! Avoided betting Clemson for all the wrong reasons and won the under when PAC-12 refs called offensive PI on Higgins TD catch. It wasn't.
Not to mention that late Moss TD had offensive pass interference not called. An obvious play that's been around since the dawn of time but PAC-12 refs don't see it. Not whining here, had no play on either team, just hate to see it.
Burrows and LSU got it done! Clemson's best chance, IMO, was to stifle that LSU offense, didn't happen.
ON TO NEXT YEAR!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.